The Security Concepts of Participants in the Euro-Atlantic Security System

Zięba, Ryszard

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-79105-0_4

Ryszard Zięba¹¹

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

403 Accesses

Abstract

The fourth chapter focuses on how program documents concerning the security concepts (strategies and doctrines) of the principal participants of the Euro-Atlantic system identify threats and challenges to security, and how they present the aims, means and methods of security policy. The author analyses the security concepts of the US, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Poland as a middle power, NATO, the EU, Russia, and the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization. He notes that terrorism is identified as the main threat by almost all those entities and shows the evolution of their perception of other challenges and threats. In the final section, the author points to similarities and differences between security concepts in light of the theory of international relations. He concludes that the rise of divergent interests among the participants of the Euro-Atlantic security system is accompanied by a return to the traditional, militarized understanding of security, in keeping with the premises of the realist paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 119.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 159.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 159.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2002), p. 5.
2.
National Security Strategy (2010), p. 18.
3.
Porter and Bendiek (2012), p. 500.
4.
National Strategy for Counterterrorism (2011), p. 4.
5.
Waśko-Owsiejczuk (2017).
6.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017), pp. 2–3, 7.
7.
Dombrowski and Reich (2017), p. 1013 et seq.; Walt (2018).
8.
Schake (2017).
9.
The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in the Independent World (2008), p. 10.
10.
Ibidem.
11.
A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy (2010), p. 28.
12.
National Security Strategy and Strategic and Defence Review 2015 (2015), p. 37.
13.
La France face au terrorisme: Livre blanc du Gouvernement sur la sécurité intérieure face au terrorisme (2006), pp. 5–6, Słomczyńska (2008).
14.
Défense et Sécurité nationale. Le Livre blanc (2008), p. 39.
15.
Livre blanc: défense et sécurité nationale 2013 (2013), p. 44.
16.
Revue stratégique de défense et de sécurité nationale 2017 (2017), p. 21.
17.
Zięba (2008), pp. 130–131.
18.
Ibidem, pp. 131–133.
19.
White Paper 2016 on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr (2016), p. 34.
20.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2007), p. 8.
21.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2014), pp. 18–19.
22.
Active Engagement (2010), p. 10.
23.
A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy (2003), p. 3. For the text of the strategy, see Missorili (2003).
24.
Shared Vision, Common Action … (2016), pp. 18–19.
25.
Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2008).
26.
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2015).
27.
Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2016).
28.
Strategiya kollektivnoy bezopasnosti Organizatsii … (2016).
29.
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2006), p. 1.
30.
National Security Strategy (2010), p. 8.
31.
National Security Strategy (2015), p. 19.
32.
Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly (2017).
33.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017), p. 2.
34.
The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in the Independent World (2008), pt. 3.1.
35.
Ibidem, pp. 10–24.
36.
National Security Strategy and Strategic and Defence Review 2015 (2015), p. 18. For more on the security strategy of the United Kingdom, see Cornish and Dorman (2015).
37.
Livre blanc: défense et sécurité nationale (2013), pp. 27–33.
38.
Ibidem, pp. 33–46.
39.
Revue stratégique de défense et de sécurité nationale (2017), pp. 17–50.
40.
White Paper (2016), p. 38.
41.
Ibidem, pp. 34–45.
42.
The National Security Strategic Review was an institution established in January 2010 by President Bronisław Komorowski. The aim of the NSSR was to assess comprehensively Poland’s national security and formulate conclusions regarding the state’s strategic objectives and practices in the field of security as the preparation of the national security system. He author of the present book was a member of the NSSR Commission. The Report of the NSSR Commission, containing key conclusions and recommendations concerning Poland’s security policy formed the basis for the publishing in April 2013 of the White Book on National Security of the Republic of Poland (2013).
43.
White Book on National Security of the Republic of Poland (2013), pp. 126–127, Zięba (2015).
44.
Zając (2016), pp. 146–147.
45.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2014), p. 21.
46.
The Defence Concept of the Republic of Poland (2017), pp. 23–24.
47.
Polish Foreign Policy Strategy 2017–2021 (2017), p. 6.
48.
Ibidem
49.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2003), pt. 31.
50.
Active Engagement (2010), pt. 7 and 8.
51.
Ibidem, pt. 9.
52.
Ibidem, pt. 10.
53.
Ibidem, pt. 11.
54.
Ibidem, pt. 12.
55.
Ibidem, pt. 13.
56.
Ibidem, pt. 14.
57.
Ibidem, pt. 15.
58.
More see Biscop (2005).
59.
Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy—Providing Security in a Changing World (2008), p. 12.
60.
On the subject of the path leading to the drawing up of a new EU global security strategy, see Mälksoo (2016).
61.
Tocci (2015).
62.
Kontseptsiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (1997).
63.
Kontseptsiya natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2000).
64.
Mróz (2000).
65.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2009).
66.
Ibidem, pt. 17.
67.
Ibidem, passim.
68.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2015).
69.
Ibidem, pt. 15.
70.
Ibidem.
71.
Ibidem, pt. 17.
72.
Ibidem, pt. 18.
73.
Ostryna (2016).
74.
Strategiya kollektivnoy bezopasnosti Organizatsii … (2016).
75.
Zięba (2000), p. 51.
76.
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2002), p. 1.
77.
Ibidem.
78.
Ibidem, passim.
79.
Zając (2008), p. 51, (2010).
80.
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2006), pp. 47–48.
81.
National Security Strategy (2010), p. 22.
82.
Ibidem, passim.
83.
National Security Strategy (2015), pp. 23–28.
84.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017), p. 8.
85.
Ibidem, pp. 8–14.
86.
Juul and Gude (2017). For more, see Brands (2017–2018).
87.
Popescu (2018), p. 91 et seq. See the papers of the prominent scholarly advocate of this school of thought: Nau (2017, 2018).
88.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017), pp. 25, 27.
89.
Ibidem, p. 37.
90.
Ibidem, pp. 47–48.
91.
The National Security Strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in the Independent World (2008), pp. 25–57.
92.
National Security Strategy and Strategic and Defence Review 2015 (2015), pp. 27, 47 et seq.
93.
Défense et sécurité nationale (2008), p. 13.
94.
For more on France’s return to NATO see: Rieker (2017), pp. 107–128.
95.
Védrine (2012), p. 23.
96.
Livre blanc: défense et sécurité nationale 2013 (2013), pp. 32, 47–68.
97.
Lasconjarias and de Saint-Victor (2017).
98.
Revue stratégique de défense et de sécurité nationale (2017), p. 56. [«Dans un système international marqué par l’instabilité et l’incertitude, la France doit conserver sa capacité à décider et à agir seule pour défendre ses intérêts.»].
99.
Ibidem, «élément clé de la sécurité européenne».
100.
Ibidem, p. 63. [«la convergence stratégique entre Européens et intéressent leur sécurité commune»].
101.
Ibidem [«“renforcement de l’autonomie stratégique de l’Europe, ce qui nécessite le développement d’une culture stratégique commune”»].
102.
Zięba (2008), p. 132.
103.
Ibidem, p. 132.
104.
White Paper 2016 on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr (2016), pp. 47–82.
105.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2014), pp. 27, 29–42.
106.
The Defence Concept of the Republic of Poland (2017), p. 40.
107.
Polish Foreign Policy Strategy 2017–2021 (2017), p. 7.
108.
National Security Strategy of the Republic of Poland (2007), pp. 16–17.
109.
Active Engagement (2010), pt 1.
110.
Ibidem, pt. 4.
111.
Ibidem, pt. 5.
112.
Ibidem, pt. 16–18.
113.
Ibidem, pt. 26–35.
114.
Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe … (2016), pp. 18–44.
115.
Solana (2016).
116.
Kontseptsiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (1997).
117.
Ibidem
118.
Kontseptsiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2000).
119.
Sakwa (2004), p. 214.
120.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2009).
121.
Voyennaya doktrina Rossiyskoy Federatsii (2010), Voyennaya doktrina Rossiyskoy Federatsii (2014).
122.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii … (2015).
123.
Charter of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (2002).
124.
Strategiya kollektivnoy bezopasnosti Organizatsii … (2016).
125.
Ostryna (2016), Lidery stran ODKB utverdili strategiyu … (2018).
126.
Morgenthau (1967), Waltz (2000).
127.
Herz (1950), pp. 158–180, Jervis (1978), Glaser (1997), Collins (2004), Tang (2009), pp. 587–588.
128.
Kolodziej (2005), pp. 26–27.
129.
Morgenthau (1967), pp. 25–26.
130.
Zięba (2004), pp. 50–52.
131.
Berkowitz and Bock (1965), p. X.
132.
For more on this subject, see: Viotti and Kauppi (1987), pp. 6, 55, Gilpin (1984), p. 16, Mearsheimer (2001), pp. 17–22.
133.
Mearsheimer (2001), pp. 192–193, 229–230, 322–327.
134.
Aron (1962).
135.
Walt, S. M. (1987), pp. 21–22, 147–180, Moul (2002), p. 659, Schweller (1994), pp. 92–93.
136.
Waltz (2000).
137.
Reus-Smith (1992), pp. 23–28.
138.
Fukuyama (1992).
139.
See Chap. 2, note 37 in this volume.
140.
See Keohane et al. (1993).
141.
Zięba (2004), pp. 49–50.
142.
Glaser (1993), pp. 47–50.

References

A secure Europe in a better Word: European Security Strategy (December 12, 2003). Brussels: The European Union.
Google Scholar
A strong Britain in an age of uncertainty: The national security strategy. Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty, London, October 2010.
Google Scholar
Active engagement, modern defence: Strategic concept for the defence and security of the members of the North Atlantic treaty organization. Adopted by Heads of States and Government at the NATO Summit in Lisbon 10–20 November 2010, NATO, Brussels 2010.
Google Scholar
Aron, R. (1962). Paix et guerre entre les nations. Paris: Calmann Lévy.
Google Scholar
Berkowitz, M., & Bock, P. G. (Eds.). (1965). American national security. A reader in theory on policy (p. X). New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Biscop, S. (2005). The European security strategy: A global agenda for a positive power. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Charter of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, October 7, 2002. http://odkb-csto.org/documents/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=1896. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Collins, A. (2004). States-induced security dilemma: Maintaining the tragedy. Cooperation and Conflict, 39(1), 27–44.
Article Google Scholar
Cornish, P., & Dorman, A. M. (2015). Complex security and strategic latency: The UK strategic defence and security review 2015. International Affairs, 91(2), 251–370.
Article Google Scholar
Défense et Sécurité nationale. Le Livre blanc (juin 2008). Paris: La documentation française.
Google Scholar
Dombrowski, P., & Reich, S. (2017). Does Donald Trump have a grand strategy? International Affairs, 93(5), 1013–1037.
Article Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1984). War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Glaser, C. L. (1993). Why NATO is still best? Future security arrangements for Europe. International Security, 18(1), 5–50.
Article Google Scholar
Glaser, C. L. (1997). The security dilemma revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201.
Article Google Scholar
Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 158–180.
Article Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214.
Article Google Scholar
Juul, P., & Gude, K. (2017, May 1). Reckless endangerment: President Trump and the use of military force. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2017/05/01/431566/reckless-endangerment-president-trump-use-military-force/. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S., & Hoffmann, S. (Eds.). (1993). After the cold war: International institutions and state strategies in Europe, 1989–1991. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Kolodziej, E. A. (2005). Security and international relations (pp. 26–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Kontseptsiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii, utv. Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 10 yanvarya 2000g. No. 24 [The concept of national security of the Russian Federation, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 10 January 2000 No. 24]. http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/14927/page/2. Accessed January 17, 2018.
Kontseptsiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii, utv. Ukazom Prezidenta RF ot 17 dekabrya 1997g. N 1300 [The concept of national security of the Russian Federation, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 17, 1997 N 1300]. https://zakonbase.ru/content/base/24975. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30 noyabrya 2016g. N 640 [The concept of the foreign policy of the Russian federation, Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of November 30, 2016 No. 640]. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201612010045?index=1&rangeSize=1. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 15 июля 2008 goda [The foreign policy concept of the Russian federation], July 15, 2008. http://kremlin.ru/acts/news/785. Accessed January 27, 2018.
La France face au terrorism: Livre blanc du Gouvernement sur la sécurité intérieure face au terrorism (2006). Paris: La documentation française.
Google Scholar
Lasconjarias, G., & de Saint-Victor, F. (2017, October 27). Chasing Grandeur? What you need to know about the 2017 French strategic review. War on the Rocks (Texas National Security Network). https://warontherocks.com/2017/10/chasing-grandeur-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-2017-french-strategic-review/. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Lidery stran ODKB utverdili strategiyu kollektivnoy bezopasnosti do 2025 goda [Leaders of CSTO countries approved collective security strategy until 2025]. http://www.belta.by/politics/view/lidery-stran-odkb-utverdili-strategiju-kollektivnoj-bezopasnosti-do-2025-goda-214775-2016/. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Livre blanc: défense et sécurité nationale 2013 (2013). Paris: La documentation française.
Google Scholar
Mälksoo, M. (2016). From the ESS to the EU global strategy: External policy, internal purpose. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 374–388.
Article Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Google Scholar
Missorili, A. (Ed.). (2003). From Copenhagen to Brussels. European defence: Core documents, Vol. IV, Chaillot Paper, No. 67, December 2003, pp. 324–333.
Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (4th ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Google Scholar
Moul, W. (2002). Dangerous balances, 1816–1989: A simple theory with longitudinal evidence. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 657–676.
Article Google Scholar
Mróz, M. (2000). Zmiany w koncepcji strategicznej Rosji 1997–2000. Informacja (Warsaw: Sejm, Biuro Studiów i Ekspertyz), No. 719.
Google Scholar
National security strategy (February 2015). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
National security strategy (May 2010). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
National security strategy of the Republic of Poland (2003). Warsaw: National Security Bureau.
Google Scholar
National security strategy of the Republic of Poland (2007). Warsaw: National Security Bureau.
Google Scholar
National security strategy of the Republic of Poland (2014). Warsaw: National Security Bureau.
Google Scholar
National security strategy of the United States of America (December 2017). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
National security strategy and strategic and defence review 2015: A secure and prosperous United Kingdom. Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty, London, November 2015.
Google Scholar
National strategy for counterterrorism (June 1, 2011). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
Nau, H. R. (2017, August 28). Trump’s conservative internationalism. National Review.
Google Scholar
Nau, H. R. (2018). Why “Conservative”, not liberal, internationalism? Orbis, 62(1), 22–29.
Article Google Scholar
Ostryna, S. (2016, Ocbober 24). Strategiya kollektivnoy bezopasnosti ODKB ne vidit ni odnoy ugrozy [CSTO collective security strategy does not see a threat]. Novosti VPK, Belarus, October 24, 2016. http://vpk.name/news/166422_strategiya_kollektivnoi_bezopasnosti_odkb_ne_vidit_ni_odnoi_ugrozyi.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Polish foreign policy strategy 2017–2021 (2017). Warsaw: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of Poland.
Google Scholar
Popescu, I. (2018). Conservative internationalism and the Trump administration? Orbis, 62(1), 91–104.
Article Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., & Bendiek, A. (2012). Counterterrorism cooperation in the transatlantic security community. European Security, 21(4), 497–517.
Article Google Scholar
Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd session of the United Nations general assembly (September 19, 2017). New York: United Nations.
Google Scholar
Report on the implementation of the European security strategy—providing security in a changing world, Doc. S407/08, Brussels, December 11, 2008.
Google Scholar
Reus-Smith, C. (1992). Realists and resistance Utopias: Community, security and political action in the New Europe. Millennium, 21(1), 1–28.
Article Google Scholar
Revue Stratégique de Défense et de Sécurité Nationale 2017 (2017). République Française.
Google Scholar
Rieker, P. (2017). French foreign policy in a changing world: Practising Grandeur. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book Google Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2004). Putin Russia choice. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Schake, K. (2017, December 19). How to grade Trump’s national security strategy on a curve: Strategizing for this president isn’t easy. But that excuse only gets you so far. Foreign Policy. http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/19/how-to-grade-trumps-national-security-strategy-on-a-curve/. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(1), 72–107.
Article Google Scholar
Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe: A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy (June 2016). Brussels: The European Union.
Google Scholar
Słomczyńska, I. (2008). Koncepcja bezpieczeństwa Francji. In R. Zięba (Ed.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe po zimnej wojnie (pp. 105–121). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar
Solana, J. (2016). Odważna strategia dla Europy, wp.pl, 01.08.2016. http://opinie.wp.pl/javier-solana-odwazna-strategia-dla-europy-6021385222407297a. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Strategiya kollektivnoy bezopasnosti Organizatsii Dogovora o kollektivnoy bezopasnosti na period do 2025 goda, 14 oktyabrya 2016 goda [The collective security strategy of the collective security treaty organization for the period up to 2025, October 14, 2016]. http://odkb-csto.org/documents/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=8382. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 dekabrya 2015g., No. 883 [The national security strategy of the Russian Federation, Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of December 31, 2015, No. 883]. https://rg.ru/2015/12/31/nac-bezopasnost-site-dok.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda, Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 maya 2009g. No. 537 [The national security strategy of the Russian Federation until 2020, Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 12, 2009 No. 537]. https://rg.ru/2009/05/19/strategia-dok.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Tang, S. (2009). The security dilemma: A conceptual analysis. Security Studies, 18(3), 587–623.
Article Google Scholar
The defence concept of the Republic of Poland (2017). Warsaw: Ministry of Defence.
Google Scholar
The national security strategy of the United Kingdom: Security in the independent world. Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister, by command of Her Majesty, London, March 2008.
Google Scholar
The national security strategy of the United States of America (March 2006). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
The national security strategy of the United States of America (September 2002). Washington, DC: The White House.
Google Scholar
Tocci, N. (2015). Towards an EU global strategy. In A. Missiroli (Ed.), Towards an EU global strategy—background, process, references (pp. 115–120). Paris: Institut d’Etudes de Securité de l’Union Européenne.
Google Scholar
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 dekabrya 2015 goda N 683 “O Strategii natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii” [Decree of the president of the Russian federation of December 31, 2015 N 683 “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation”]. https://rg.ru/2015/12/31/nac-bezopasnost-site-dok.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Védrine, H. (2012, November 14). Rapport pour le président de la République sur les conséquences du retour de la France dans le commandement intégré de l’OTAN, sur l’avenir de la relation transatlantique et les perspectives de l’Europe de la défense. Paris: Présidence de la République.
Google Scholar
Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1987). International relations theory: Realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
Voyennaya doktrina Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 30 dekabrya 2014g. [Military doctrine of the Russian Federation, December 30, 2014], Rossiyskaya Gazeta—Federal Edition No. 6570 (298), 08. https://rg.ru/2014/12/30/doktrina-dok.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Voyennaya doktrina Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 5 fevralya 2010 goda [The military doctrine of the Russian Federation, February 5, 2010]. http://kremlin.ru/supplement/461. Accessed January 27, 2018.
Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Walt, S. M. (2018). US grand strategy after the cold war: Can realism explain it? Should realism guide it? International Relations, 32(1), 3–22.
Article Google Scholar
Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(2), 5–41.
Article Google Scholar
Waśko-Owsiejczuk, E. (2017). Is America safer today? The first changes to U.S. foreign and security policy during the presidency of Donald Trump. Przegląd Politologiczny, 3, 161–178.
Google Scholar
White book on national security of the Republic of Poland (2013). Warsaw: National Security Bureau.
Google Scholar
White Paper 2016 on German security policy and the future of the Bundeswehr (2016). Berlin: The Federal Government.
Google Scholar
Zając, J. (2008). Koncepcja bezpieczeństwa USA. In R. Zięba (Ed.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe po zimnej wojnie (pp. 43–61). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar
Zając, J. (2010). Doktryna uderzenia wyprzedzającego w polityce bezpieczeństwa USA. In J. Symonides (Ed.), Świat wobec współczesnych wyzwań i zagrożeń (pp. 362–374). Warsaw: Scholar.
Google Scholar
Zając, J. (2016). Poland’s security policy: The West, Russia and the changing international order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book Google Scholar
Zięba, A. (2008). Koncepcja bezpieczeństwa Niemiec. In R. Zięba (Ed.), Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe po zimnej wojnie (pp. 122–146). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Google Scholar
Zięba, R. (2000). Miejsce Europy w ogólnej koncepcji bezpieczeństwa USA u progu XXI wieku. In E. Cziomer (Ed.), Udział USA w systemie bezpieczeństwa europejskiego (pp. 51–65). Kraków: Meritum.
Google Scholar
Zięba, R. (2004a). Cele polityki zagranicznej państwa. In R. Zięba (Ed.), Wstęp do teorii polityki zagranicznej państwa (pp. 37–58). Toruń: Adam Marszałek.
Google Scholar
Zięba, R. (2004b). Instytucjonalizacja bezpieczeństwa europejskiego; koncepcje – struktury – funkcjonowanie. Warsaw: Scholar.
Google Scholar
Zięba, R. (2015). Poland and France: A cross analysis of security threats and national interests. In M. de Langlois (Ed.), Vers une nouvelle stratégie européenne de sécurité (Vol. 25, pp. 46–54). Paris: Laboratoires de l’IRSEM, Institut de recherche stratégique de l’École Militaire.
Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Ryszard Zięba

Authors

Ryszard Zięba
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryszard Zięba .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zięba, R. (2018). The Security Concepts of Participants in the Euro-Atlantic Security System. In: The Euro-Atlantic Security System in the 21st Century. Global Power Shift. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79105-0_4

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79105-0_4
Published: 26 April 2018
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79104-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79105-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics