• Ryszard ZiębaEmail author
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)


The introduction makes the case for addressing the issue of the Euro-Atlantic security system in the 21st century and explains the importance of the system and of its evolution form cooperation to rivalry and crisis. The author adopts the neorealist perspective as a method of analysis, and refers to the premises championed by Kenneth Waltz, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. The book has three parts. The first presents the background for the analysis, i.e., the origins of the Euro-Atlantic security system (Chap.  1), the changing challenges and threats faced by that system (Chap.  2), and the security concepts of the system’s participants (Chap.  3); the second contains an analysis of the functioning of the system—from cooperation to crisis (Chaps.  3,  4,  5,  6,  7); while the third presents the consequences of the erosion of cooperation within the system leading to the Ukraine crisis, and shows the prospects for the system’s evolution.


Euro-Atlantic Security System Global International Order Transatlantic Security Community Security Threshold Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Butterfield, H. (1951). History and human relations. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  2. Cottey, A. (2013). Security in 21st Century Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Donnelly, J. (2000). Realism and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Donnelly, J. (2012). The elements of the structures of international systems. International Organization, 66(4), 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Fiammengi, D. (2011). The security curve and the structure of international politics: A neorealist synthesis. International Security, 35(4), 126–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilpin, R. (1984). War and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gorbachev, M. S. (1987). Perestroika: New thinking for our country and the world. Scranton, PA: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  9. Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2(2), 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herz, J. (1951). Political realism and political idealism: A study in theories and realities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffman, S. (1973). International organization and international system. In L. M. Goodrich & D. A. Kay (Eds.), International organization: Politics and process (pp. 49–73). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keohane, R. O. (1969). Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolodziej, E. A. (2005). Security and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kukułka, J. (1978). Problemy teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
  15. Kupchan, C. A. (2012). No one’s world: The west, the rising rest and the coming global turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994/1995). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the west’s fault: The liberal delusions that Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (4th ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  20. Nolan, J. E. (Ed.). (1994). Global engagement: Cooperation and security in the 21th century. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  21. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2002–2003). Limits of American power. Political Science Quarterly, 117(4), 552–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  23. Organski, A. F. K. (1958). World politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  24. Parent, J. M., & Rosato, S. (2015). Balancing in neorealism. International Security, 40(2), 51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pawłuszko, T. (2014). Kategoria system międzynarodowego w badaniach stosunków międzynarodowych. Toruń: Adam Marszałek.Google Scholar
  26. Pietraś, Z. J. (1984). Podstawy teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Lublin: UMCS.Google Scholar
  27. Risse, T. (2016). The transatlantic security community: Erosion from within? In R. Alcaro, J. Peterson, & E. Greco (Eds.), The west and the global power shift Transatlantic relations and global governance (pp. 21–42). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sakwa, R. (2015). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  29. Schweller, R. L. (2001). The problem of international order revisited. A review essay. International Security, 26(1), 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taliaferro, J. W. (2000/2001). Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (1987). International relations theory: Realism, pluralism, globalism, and beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  32. Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Company.Google Scholar
  34. Waltz, K. N. (1997). Evaluating theories’. American Political Science Review, 91(4), 913–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(2), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Political Science and International StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations