Abstract
Varicocele repair (VR) has been a mainstay of treatment for male factor infertility for decades. Many males have varicoceles but identifying those who would benefit most from varicocele repair is challenging. This challenge has become more significant with the advent of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), when patients readily proceed to intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), even with suboptimal semen parameters. In this chapter, we argue that infertile couples with a male partner having a varicocele will benefit from varicocele repair, prior to proceeding to any form of ART. VR may eliminate the need for ART in some couples, and for those couples who still require ART after VR, repair improves success rates by improving sperm counts and quality and is cost-effective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Marmar J. The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:171. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.170866.
Pathak P, Chandrashekar A, Hakky T, Pastuszak A. Varicocele management in the era of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:343. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.178482.
Samplaski MK, Lo KC, Grober ED, Zini A, Jarvi KA. Varicocelectomy to “upgrade” semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:609–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.017.
Cayan S, Erdemir F, Ozbey I, Turek PJ, Kadioğlu A, Tellaloğlu S. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol. 2002;167:1749–52.
Daitch JA, Bedaiwy MA, Pasqualotto EB, Hendin BN, Hallak J, Falcone T, et al. Varicocelectomy improves intrauterine insemination success rates in men with varicocele. J Urol. 2001;165:1510–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66338-0.
Esteves SC, Oliveira FV, Bertolla RP. Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with treated and untreated clinical varicocele. J Urol. 2010;184:1442–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.004.
Zini A, Boman J, Baazeem A, Jarvi K, Libman J. Natural history of varicocele management in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2251–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.071.
Rebar RW. What are the risks of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and how can they be minimized?; What are the risks of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and how can they be minimized? n.d. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-013-0156-y.
Basatemur E, Sutcliffe A. Follow-up of children born after ART. n.d. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2008.08.013.
Halliday J. Outcomes for offspring of men having ICSI for male factor infertility. Asian J Androl. 2012;1471:116–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.71.
Simpson JL. Birth defects and assisted reproductive technologies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:177–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.01.001.
Massaro PA, Maclellan DL, Anderson PA, Romao RLP. Does intracytoplasmic sperm injection pose an increased risk of genitourinary congenital malformations in offspring compared to in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2015;193:1837–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.113.
Schatte EC, Hirshberg SJ, Fallick ML, Lipshultz LI, Kim ED. Varicocelectomy improves sperm strict morphology and motility. J Urol. 1998;160:1338–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62531-X.
Kohn TP, Kohn JR, Pastuszak AW. Varicocelectomy before assisted reproductive technology: are outcomes improved? Fertil Steril. 2017;108:385–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.033.
Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2010;183:2309–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.012.
Damsgaard J, Joensen UN, Carlsen E, Erenpreiss J, Blomberg Jensen M, Matulevicius V, et al. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels: a study of 7035 healthy young men from six European countries. Eur Urol. 2016;70:1019–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.044.
Goulis DC, Mintziori G, Koliakos N, Hatzichristou D, Papadimas I, Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Inhibin B and anti-Müllerian hormone in spermatic vein of subfertile men with varicocele. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:551–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719110393024.
Li H, Dubocq F, Jiang Y, Tiguert R, Gheiler EL, Dhabuwala C. Effect of surgically induced varicocele on testicular blood flow and Sertoli cell function. Urology. 1999;53:1258–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00013-8.
Comhaire F, Vermeulen A. Plasma testosterone in patients with varicocele and sexual inadequacy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975;40:824–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-40-5-824.
Vazquez-Levin MH, Friedmann P, Goldberg SI, Medley NE, Nagler HM. Response of routine semen analysis and critical assessment of sperm morphology by Kruger classification to therapeutic varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1997;158:1804–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64134-X.
Sheehan MM, Ramasamy R, Lamb DJ. Molecular mechanisms involved in varicocele-associated infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:521–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0200-9.
Baccetti BM, Bruni E, Capitani S, Collodel G, Mancini S, Piomboni P, et al. Studies on varicocele III: ultrastructural sperm evaluation and 18, X and Y aneuploidies. J Androl. 2006;27:94–101. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05081.
Alhathal N, San Gabriel M, Zini A. Beneficial effects of microsurgical varicocoelectomy on sperm maturation, DNA fragmentation, and nuclear sulfhydryl groups: a prospective trial. Andrology. 2016;4:1204–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12256.
Smit M, Romijn JC, Wildhagen MF, Veldhoven JLM, Weber RFA, Dohle GR. Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.024.
Li F, Yamaguchi K, Okada K, Matsushita K, Ando M, Chiba K, et al. Significant improvement of sperm DNA quality after microsurgical repair of varicocele. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012;58:274–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2012.692431.
Wang Y-J, Zhang R-Q, Lin Y-J, Zhang R-G, Zhang W-L, Zhang W-L. Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:307–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.002.
Chen S-S, Huang WJ, Chang LS, Wei Y-H. Attenuation of oxidative stress after varicocelectomy in subfertile patients with varicocele. J Urol. 2008;179:639–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2007.09.039.
Gabriel MS, Chan SW, Alhathal N, Chen JZ, Zini A. Influence of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number: a pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:759–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9785-z.
Ghanaie MM, Asgari SA, Dadrass N, Allahkhah A, Iran-Pour E, Safarinejad MR. Effects of varicocele repair on spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J. 2012;9:505–13.
Kirby EW, Wiener LE, Rajanahally S, Crowell K, Coward RM. Undergoing varicocele repair before assisted reproduction improves pregnancy rate and live birth rate in azoospermic and oligospermic men with a varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1338–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1093.
Ashkenazi J, Dicker D, Felberg D, Shelef M, Goldman GA, Goldman J. The impact of spermatic vein ligation on the male factor in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and its relation to testosterone levels before and after operation. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:471–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)60556-3.
Gokce MI, Gülpinar Ö, Süer E, Mermerkaya M, Aydos K, Yaman Ö. Effect of performing varicocelectomy before intracytoplasmic sperm injection on clinical outcomes in non-azoospermic males. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45:367–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0394-2.
Pasqualotto FF, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Setti AS, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Varicocelectomy does not impact pregnancy outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. J Androl. 2012;33:239–43. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.110.011932.
Shiraishi K, Oka S, Matsuyama H. Predictive factors for sperm recovery after varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2017;197:485–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.085.
Schlegel PN, Kaufmann J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1585–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2003.10.036.
Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, Dikmen AV, Gürgan T, Ergen A. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182:1500–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.028.
Haydardedeoglu B, Turunc T, Kilicdag EB, Gul U, Bagis T. The effect of prior varicocelectomy in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a Retrospective Pilot Study. Urology. 2010;75:83–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.023.
Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:246–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.169562.
Dupree JM. Insurance coverage for male infertility care in the United States. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:339–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.177838.
Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology. 1997;49:83.
Penson DF, Paltiel AD, Krumholz HM, Palter S. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for varicocele related infertility. J Urol. 2002;168:2490–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64175-4.
Dubin JM, Greer AB, Kohn TP, Masterson TA, Ji L, Ramasamy R. Men with severe oligospermia appear to benefit from varicocele repair: a cost-effectiveness analysis of assisted reproductive technology. Urology. 2018;111:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.010.
Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005;174:1926–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000176736.74328.1a.
Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:613–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55809-9.
Witt MA, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: a progressive or static lesion? Urology. 1993;42:541–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(93)90268-F.
Locke JA, Noparast M, Afshar K. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13:437–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUROL.2017.07.008.
Li F, Yue H, Yamaguchi K, Okada K, Matsushita K, Ando M, et al. Effect of surgical repair on testosterone production in infertile men with varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2012;19:149–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02890.x.
Su LM, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN. The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone levels in infertile men with varicoceles. J Urol. 1995;154:1752–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66776-4.
Tanrikut C, Goldstein M, Rosoff JS, Lee RK, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP. Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair. BJU Int. 2011;108:1480–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10030.x.
Sathya Srini V, Belur Veerachari S. Clinical Study Does varicocelectomy improve gonadal function in men with hypogonadism and infertility? Analysis of a prospective study. Int J Endocrinol. 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/916380.
Najari BB, Introna L, Paduch DA. Improvements in patient-reported sexual function after microsurgical varicocelectomy. Urology. 2017;110:104–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2016.04.044.
O’brien JH, Bowles B, Kamal KM, Jarvi K, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced female age: natural history in the era of ART. J Androl. 2004;25:939–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb03165.x.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Christopher R.V. Hoover, MD (Gallup, NM), for creating and kindly providing the figures included in this chapter.
This work is supported in part by NIH grants K12 DK0083014, the Multidisciplinary K12 Urologic Research (KURe) Career Development Program awarded to DJL (NT is a K12 Scholar) and R01DK078121 from the National Institute of Kidney and Digestive Diseases to Dolores J Lamb. Alexander W. Pastuszak is supported by a K08 Mentored Career Development Award from the National Institute of Kidney and Digestive Diseases (DK115835-01). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thirumavalavan, N., Gabrielsen, J.S., Pastuszak, A.W. (2019). Pros: Should Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing Be Used in Men with Varicocele?. In: Esteves, S., Cho, CL., Majzoub, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79101-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79102-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)