Advertisement

Genetics and Epigenetics of Varicocele Pathophysiology

  • Viviane Paiva Santana
  • Cristiana Libardi Miranda-Furtado
  • Rosana Maria dos ReisEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Varicocele is the main identifiable cause of male infertility. Despite the impairment of spermatogenesis and its associated infertility, not all men with varicocele are infertile or have alterations in semen parameters. Furthermore, varicocele can be corrected surgically, which may improve semen parameters. Given all of their adverse effects on male reproduction, the current description of varicocele pathophysiology cannot explain the variety of associated clinical manifestations and why varicocelectomy is effective in some cases only. Therefore, varicocele pathophysiology appears to be multifactorial and complex, and it is influenced by genetic alterations and is associated with a strong environmental component. Moreover, testicular environmental alterations caused by varicocele, such as increased temperature and oxidative stress, may lead to changes in gene expression due to epimutations that have implications in sperm production and fertility. Studies have demonstrated chromosomal disorders, gene mutations, polymorphisms, and alterations in gene expression that significantly influence the etiology of the condition. Here, we review the main genetic and epigenetic changes related to varicocele, highlighting the key findings from recent studies to provide a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology underlying varicocele development.

Keywords

Genetics Epigenetics Genome Transcriptome Chromosome Polymorphism Mutation Methylation 

References

  1. 1.
    Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mokhtari G, Pourreza F, Falahatkar S, Kamran AN, Jamali M. Comparison of prevalence of varicocele in first-degree relatives of patients with varicocele and male kidney donors. Urology. 2008;71:666–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gökçe A, et al. Hereditary behavior of varicocele. J Androl. 2010;31:288–90.  https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.109.008698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown JS, Dubin L, Hotchkiss RS. The varicocele as related to fertility. Fertil Steril. 1967;18:46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:473–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheehan MM, Ramasamy R, Lamb DJ. Molecular mechanisms involved in varicocele-associated infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:521–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0200-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santana VP, Miranda-Furtado CL, de Oliveira-Gennaro FG, Dos Reis RM. Genetics and epigenetics of varicocele pathophysiology: an overview. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:839–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0931-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foresta C, Ferlin A, Gianaroli L, Dallapiccola B. Guidelines for the appropriate use of genetic tests in infertile couples. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10:303–12.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dada R, Gupta NP, Kucheria K. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of male infertility: Y chromosome deletion during nonobstructive azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2006;44:171–7.  https://doi.org/10.1385/CBB:44:1:171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Assche E, et al. Cytogenetics of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(Suppl 4):1–24; discussion 25-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi Q, Martin RH. Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men. Reproduction. 2001;121:655–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson MD. Genetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of male infertility: recommendations for genetic counseling and screening. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rao L, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men with varicocele and idiopathic infertility of South Indian origin. J Androl. 2004;25:147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stahl BC, Patil SR, Syrop CH, Sparks AE, Wald M. Supernumerary minute ring chromosome 14 in a man with primary infertility and left varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:1213.e1211–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crolla JA. FISH and molecular studies of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosome 15: II. Review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75:367–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gentile M, et al. Infertility in carriers of two bisatellited marker chromosomes. Clin Genet. 1993;44:71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee J, et al. Detailed analysis of isodicentric Y in a case with azoospermia and 45,x/46,x,idic(Y) mosaicism. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2015;45:206–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DesGroseilliers M, Beaulieu Bergeron M, Brochu P, Lemyre E, Lemieux N. Phenotypic variability in isodicentric Y patients: study of nine cases. Clin Genet. 2006;70:145–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00654.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vergnaud G, et al. A deletion map of the human Y chromosome based on DNA hybridization. Am J Hum Genet. 1986;38:109–24.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dada R, Gupta NP, Kucheria K. AZF microdeletions associated with idiopathic and non-idiopathic cases with cryptorchidism and varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2002;4:259–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vogt PH, et al. Human Y chromosome azoospermia factors (AZF) mapped to different subregions in Yq11. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:933–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moro E, Marin P, Rossi A, Garolla A, Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men with varicocele. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;161:67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foppiani L, et al. Lack of evidence of a genetic origin in the impaired spermatogenesis of a patient cohort with low-grade varicocele. J Endocrinol Investig. 2001;24:217–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03343850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gao DJ, et al. Screening of Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile males with varicocele. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2012;18:973–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dai RL, et al. Varicocele and male infertility in Northeast China: Y chromosome microdeletion as an underlying cause. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:6583–90.  https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.June.12.13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Sousa Filho EP, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP, Glina S, Bianco B. Y chromosome microdeletions and varicocele as aetiological factors of male infertility: a cross-sectional study. Andrologia. 2018;50  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cayan S, Lee D, Black LD, Reijo Pera RA, Turek PJ. Response to varicocelectomy in oligospermic men with and without defined genetic infertility. Urology. 2001;57:530–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harton GL, Tempest HG. Chromosomal disorders and male infertility. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:32–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Finkelstein S, Mukamel E, Yavetz H, Paz G, Avivi L. Increased rate of nondisjunction in sex cells derived from low-quality semen. Hum Genet. 1998;102:129–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Egozcue J, et al. Genetic analysis of sperm and implications of severe male infertility--a review. Placenta. 2003;24(Suppl B):S62–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mroz K, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Meiotic aneuploidy in the XXY mouse: evidence that a compromised testicular environment increases the incidence of meiotic errors. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reichart M, et al. Sperm ultramorphology as a pathophysiological indicator of spermatogenesis in males suffering from varicocele. Andrologia. 2000;32:139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baccetti BM, et al. Studies on varicocele III: ultrastructural sperm evaluation and 18, X and Y aneuploidies. J Androl. 2006;27:94–101.  https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Acar H, Kilinc M, Guven S, Yurdakul T, Celik R. Comparison of semen profile and frequency of chromosome aneuploidies in sperm nuclei of patients with varicocele before and after varicocelectomy. Andrologia. 2009;41:157–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2008.00907.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schafer AJ, Hawkins JR. DNA variation and the future of human genetics. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:33–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0198-33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Massart A, Lissens W, Tournaye H, Stouffs K. Genetic causes of spermatogenic failure. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:40–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2011.67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang S, et al. Association between DAZL polymorphisms and susceptibility to male infertility: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4642.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jiang W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genetic association between protamine polymorphism and male infertility. Andrologia. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen SS, Chang LS, Chen HW, Wei YH. Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase M1 and male infertility in Taiwanese patients with varicocele. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:718–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Acar H, Kılınç M, Guven S, Inan Z. Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 polymorphisms in Turkish patients with varicocele. Andrologia. 2012;44:34–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01103.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu Q, et al. Influence of polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase T1 on Chinese infertile patients with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:960–2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen SS, Chiu LP. The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and male subfertility in Taiwanese patients with varicocele. Andrologia. 2018:e13007.  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heidari MM, Khatami M, Talebi AR, Moezzi F. Mutation analysis of TNP1 gene in infertile men with varicocele. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12:257–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kahraman CY, et al. The Relationship Between Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene (NOS3) Polymorphisms, NOS3 Expression, and Varicocele. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016;20:191–6.  https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2015.0294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ucar VB, Nami B, Acar H, Kilinç M. Is methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene A1298C polymorphism related with varicocele risk? Andrologia. 2015;47:42–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gentile V, et al. ACP1 genetic polymorphism and spermatic parameters in men with varicocele. Andrologia. 2014;46:147–50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12059.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gentile V, et al. The relationship between p53 codon 72 genetic polymorphism and sperm parameters. A study of men with varicocele. Reprod Med Biol. 2015;14:11–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-014-0188-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tang K, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1, and the assessment of oxidative damage in infertile men with varicoceles from northwestern China. J Androl. 2012;33:257–63.  https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.110.012468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Okubo K, et al. GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms are associated with improvement in seminal findings after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1579–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ichioka K, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase T1 affect the surgical outcome of varicocelectomies in infertile patients. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:333–41.  https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2008.27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shen H, Ong C. Detection of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with sperm function and male infertility. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:529–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aoki VW, Liu L, Carrell DT. Identification and evaluation of a novel sperm protamine abnormality in a population of infertile males. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1298–306.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh798.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Miyagawa Y, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and mutation analyses of the TNP1 and TNP2 genes of fertile and infertile human male populations. J Androl. 2005;26:779–86.  https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Siasi E, Aleyasin A, Mowla J, Sahebkashaf H. Association study of six SNPs in PRM1, PRM2 and TNP2 genes in iranian infertile men with idiopathic azoospermia. Iran J Reprod Med. 2012;10:329–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bolotina VM, Najibi S, Palacino JJ, Pagano PJ, Cohen RA. Nitric oxide directly activates calcium-dependent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle. Nature. 1994;368:850–3.  https://doi.org/10.1038/368850a0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang MX, et al. Biogenesis of short intronic repeat 27-nucleotide small RNA from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase gene. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14685–93.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M801933200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Godfrey V, et al. The functional consequence of the Glu298Asp polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene in young healthy volunteers. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2007;25:280–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3466.2007.00017.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Födinger M, Hörl WH, Sunder-Plassmann G. Molecular biology of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. J Nephrol. 2000;13:20–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    La Salle S, et al. Loss of spermatogonia and wide-spread DNA methylation defects in newborn male mice deficient in DNMT3L. BMC Dev Biol. 2007;7:104.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-7-104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schwahn B, Rozen R. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: clinical consequences. Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2001;1:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Singh K, Singh SK, Sah R, Singh I, Raman R. Mutation C677T in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with male infertility in an Indian population. Int J Androl. 2005;28:115–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2004.00513.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lee HC, et al. Association study of four polymorphisms in three folate-related enzyme genes with non-obstructive male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3162–70.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Stefani M, et al. Dephosphorylation of tyrosine phosphorylated synthetic peptides by rat liver phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase isoenzymes. FEBS Lett. 1993;326:131–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bottini N, Bottini E, Gloria-Bottini F, Mustelin T. Low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase and human disease: in search of biochemical mechanisms. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2002;50:95–104.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mashayekhi F, Hadiyan SP. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in TP53 may be a genetic risk factor for Iranian patients with idiopathic male infertility. Andrologia. 2012;44(Suppl 1):560–4.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01227.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC, George DL, Murphy M. The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet. 2003;33:357–65.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sullivan A, et al. Polymorphism in wild-type p53 modulates response to chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene. 2004;23:3328–37.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Logan DC. The mitochondrial compartment. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:1225–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tait SW, Green DR. Mitochondria and cell signalling. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:807–15.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.099234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Park CB, Larsson NG. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in disease and aging. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:809–18.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010024.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Folgerø T, Bertheussen K, Lindal S, Torbergsen T, Oian P. Mitochondrial disease and reduced sperm motility. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1863–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Song GJ, Lewis V. Mitochondrial DNA integrity and copy number in sperm from infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2238–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.059.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Luo SM, Schatten H, Sun QY. Sperm mitochondria in reproduction: good or bad and where do they go? J Genet Genomics. 2013;40:549–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2013.08.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Moraes CR, Meyers S. The sperm mitochondrion: organelle of many functions. Anim Reprod Sci. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rajender S, Rahul P, Mahdi AA. Mitochondria, spermatogenesis and male infertility. Mitochondrion. 2010;10:419–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2010.05.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ramalho-Santos J, et al. Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:553–72.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chen SS, Huang WJ, Chang LS, Wei YH. 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine in leukocyte DNA of spermatic vein as a biomarker of oxidative stress in patients with varicocele. J Urol. 2004;172:1418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Aitken RJ, Baker MA. Oxidative stress, sperm survival and fertility control. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;250:66–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2005.12.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sawyer DE, Van Houten B. Repair of DNA damage in mitochondria. Mutat Res. 1999;434:161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    St John JC, Jokhi RP, Barratt CL. The impact of mitochondrial genetics on male infertility. Int J Androl. 2005;28:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00515.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Spiropoulos J, Turnbull DM, Chinnery PF. Can mitochondrial DNA mutations cause sperm dysfunction? Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:719–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gashti NG, Salehi Z, Madani AH, Dalivandan ST. 4977-bp mitochondrial DNA deletion in infertile patients with varicocele. Andrologia. 2014;46:258–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12073.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kao SH, Chao HT, Wei YH. Multiple deletions of mitochondrial DNA are associated with the decline of motility and fertility of human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4:657–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Baklouti-Gargouri S, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations and polymorphisms in asthenospermic infertile men. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:4705–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-2566-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nissanka N, Moraes CT. Mitochondrial DNA damage and reactive oxygen species in neurodegenerative disease. FEBS Lett. 2018;592:728–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.12956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Jena NR. DNA damage by reactive species: Mechanisms, mutation and repair. J Biosci. 2012;37:503–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    St John JC, Sakkas D, Barratt CL. A role for mitochondrial DNA and sperm survival. J Androl. 2000;21:189–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Heidari MM, et al. Mitochondrial genetic variation in iranian infertile men with varicocele. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;10:303–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wai T, et al. The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in mammalian fertility. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.080887.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gabriel MS, Chan SW, Alhathal N, Chen JZ, Zini A. Influence of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm mitochondrial DNA copy number: a pilot study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:759–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9785-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    St John JC, Bowles EJ, Amaral A. Sperm mitochondria and fertilisation. Soc Reprod Fertil. 2007;Suppl 65:399–416.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Holliday R. The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science. 1987;238:163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Schagdarsurengin U, Paradowska A, Steger K. Analysing the sperm epigenome: roles in early embryogenesis and assisted reproduction. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:609–19.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.183.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14 Spec No 1:R47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Carrell DT. Epigenetics of the male gamete. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:267–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ng HH, Bird A. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999;9:158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lister R, et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature. 2009;462:315–22.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD. DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? Genes Cancer. 2011;2:607–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601910393957.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lan J, Hua S, He X, Zhang Y. DNA methyltransferases and methyl-binding proteins of mammals. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2010;42:243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tunc O, Tremellen K. Oxidative DNA damage impairs global sperm DNA methylation in infertile men. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:537–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9346-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Marques CJ, et al. DNA methylation imprinting marks and DNA methyltransferase expression in human spermatogenic cell stages. Epigenetics. 2011;6:1354–61.  https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.11.17993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Benchaib M, et al. Influence of global sperm DNA methylation on IVF results. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:768–73.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ichiyanagi T, Ichiyanagi K, Miyake M, Sasaki H. Accumulation and loss of asymmetric non-CpG methylation during male germ-cell development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:738–45.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Navarro-Costa P, et al. Incorrect DNA methylation of the DAZL promoter CpG island associates with defective human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2647–54.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Hammoud SS, Purwar J, Pflueger C, Cairns BR, Carrell DT. Alterations in sperm DNA methylation patterns at imprinted loci in two classes of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1728–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Urdinguio RG, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns of spermatozoa in men with unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1014–28.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Benchaib M, et al. Quantitation by image analysis of global DNA methylation in human spermatozoa and its prognostic value in in vitro fertilization: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:947–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bahreinian M, et al. DNA hypomethylation predisposes sperm to DNA damage in individuals with varicocele. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;61:179–86.  https://doi.org/10.3109/19396368.2015.1020116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Tavalaee M, Bahreinian M, Barekat F, Abbasi H, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm functional characteristics and DNA methylation. Andrologia. 2014;  https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12345.
  110. 110.
    Reik W, Santos F, Dean W. Mammalian epigenomics: reprogramming the genome for development and therapy. Theriogenology. 2003;59:21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Wang Z, Schones DE, Zhao K. Characterization of human epigenomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sonnack V, Failing K, Bergmann M, Steger K. Expression of hyperacetylated histone H4 during normal and impaired human spermatogenesis. Andrologia. 2002;34:384–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hammoud SS, et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies changes in histone retention and epigenetic modifications at developmental and imprinted gene loci in the sperm of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2558–69.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    García-Peiró A, et al. Protamine 1 to protamine 2 ratio correlates with dynamic aspects of DNA fragmentation in human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:105–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Ni K, et al. Sperm protamine mRNA ratio and DNA fragmentation index represent reliable clinical biomarkers for men with varicocele after microsurgical varicocele ligation. J Urol. 2014;192:170–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Abhari A, et al. Significance of microRNA targeted estrogen receptor in male fertility. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2014;17:81–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. 2005;120:15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Inui M, Martello G, Piccolo S. MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:252–63.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ro S, Park C, Sanders KM, McCarrey JR, Yan W. Cloning and expression profiling of testis-expressed microRNAs. Dev Biol. 2007;311:592–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Lian J, et al. Altered microRNA expression in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Abu-Halima M, et al. Altered microRNA expression profiles of human spermatozoa in patients with different spermatogenic impairments. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1249–1255.e1216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Wang C, et al. Altered profile of seminal plasma microRNAs in the molecular diagnosis of male infertility. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1722–31.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.169714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Leung AK, Sharp PA. MicroRNA functions in stress responses. Mol Cell. 2010;40:205–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Mostafa T, et al. Seminal miRNA relationship with apoptotic markers and oxidative stress in infertile men with varicocele. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4302754.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4302754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Ji Z, et al. Expressions of miR-15a and its target gene HSPA1B in the spermatozoa of patients with varicocele. Reproduction. 2014;147:693–701.  https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Li G, Luna C, Qiu J, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Alterations in microRNA expression in stress-induced cellular senescence. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130:731–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2009.09.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Eddy EM. Male germ cell gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002;57:103–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Miller D, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA. The controversy, potential and roles of spermatozoal RNA. Trends Mol Med. 2005;11:156–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2005.02.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Lambard S, et al. Analysis and significance of mRNA in human ejaculated sperm from normozoospermic donors: relationship to sperm motility and capacitation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:535–41.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Li C, Zhou X. Gene transcripts in spermatozoa: markers of male infertility. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1035–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.03.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Zalata AA, et al. Androgen receptor expression relationship with semen variables in infertile men with varicocele. J Urol. 2013;189:2243–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Del Giudice PT, et al. Expression of the Fas-ligand gene in ejaculated sperm from adolescents with and without varicocele. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:103–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9384-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Mostafa T, Rashed L, Nabil N, Amin R. Seminal BAX and BCL2 gene and protein expressions in infertile men with varicocele. Urology. 2014;84:590–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ferlin A, et al. Heat shock protein and heat shock factor expression in sperm: relation to oligozoospermia and varicocele. J Urol. 2010;183:1248–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Yeşilli C, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm creatine kinase, HspA2 chaperone protein (creatine kinase-M type), LDH, LDH-X, and lipid peroxidation product levels in infertile men with varicocele. Urology. 2005;66:610–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Lima SB, et al. Expression of the HSPA2 gene in ejaculated spermatozoa from adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1659–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Janghorban-Laricheh E, et al. An association between sperm PLCζ levels and varicocele? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1649–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0802-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Oliveira A, et al. Comparative study of gene expression in patients with varicocele by microarray technology. Andrologia. 2012;44(Suppl 1):260–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01173.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Amer MK, Mostafa RM, Fathy A, Saad HM, Mostafa T. Ropporin gene expression in infertile asthenozoospermic men with varicocele before and after repair. Urology. 2015;85:805–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Wang RS, Yeh S, Tzeng CR, Chang C. Androgen receptor roles in spermatogenesis and fertility: lessons from testicular cell-specific androgen receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:119–32.  https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2008-0025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Almeida C, et al. Caspase signalling pathways in human spermatogenesis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:487–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-9938-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Mieusset R, Bujan L. Testicular heating and its possible contributions to male infertility: a review. Int J Androl. 1995;18:169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Lanneau D, et al. Heat shock proteins: essential proteins for apoptosis regulation. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:743–61.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00273.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Aghajanpour S, et al. Quantitative expression of phospholipase C zeta, as an index to assess fertilization potential of a semen sample. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2950–6.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Yelumalai S, et al. Total levels, localization patterns, and proportions of sperm exhibiting phospholipase C zeta are significantly correlated with fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:561–568.e564.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viviane Paiva Santana
    • 1
  • Cristiana Libardi Miranda-Furtado
    • 1
  • Rosana Maria dos Reis
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsRibeirao Preto Medical School of University of Sao Paulo (USP)Ribeirao PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations