Skip to main content

What Should Be the Ideal Control Group in Clinical Trials Investigating the Role of Varicocele and Its Treatment on Fertility Outcomes?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varicocele and Male Infertility

Abstract

Varicocele is a condition capable of affecting the male fertility potential. The decision of treatment depends on how the disease is harming the individual, but the real effectiveness of an intervention can only be evaluated by studies named clinical trials. A clinical trial evaluates the intervention effectiveness over a specific condition and for that requires a comparative group called control group. There are three different approaches on varicocele treatment studies, and all of them require a control group. When studying the treatment effects over treated and untreated groups, the control group is the one which has not received the treatment. When comparing two different therapies, the control group is the one receiving the gold standard treatment. Studies analyzing the same treatment offered in different points of time consider control group the one which receive treatment on the commonly well-established point in time. Therefore, control group should be the one that best fits for the purpose of a certain study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP, Hassun Filho PA, Lima SB, Ortiz V, Srougi M. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation in adolescents with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):625–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blumer CG, Fariello RM, Restelli AE, Spaine DM, Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial activity in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1716–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori MM, Bertolla RP, Fraietta R, Ortiz V, Cedenho AP. Does varicocele grade determine extent of alteration to spermatogenesis in adolescents? Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1769–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1556–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NIH’s Definition of a Clinical Trial | grants.nih.gov [Internet]. [cited in May 3rd, 2018]. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm.

  6. Counsell N, Kirkwood A. Choice of control group in clinical trials: prospective or retrospective. In: Important Considerations for Clinical Trial Methodologies [Internet]. Future Science Ltd; 2013 [cited in May 3rd, 2018]. p. 24–38. (Future Science Book Series). Available at: https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.4155/ebo.13.495.

  7. Choice of Control Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials: ICH [Internet]. [Cited in May 3rd, 2018]. Available at: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/efficacy-single/article/choice-of-control-group-and-related-issues-in-clinical-trials.html.

  8. Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, Miyake K, Ishigaki T. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol. 1996;155(5):1636–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grasso M, Lania C, Castelli M, Galli L, Franzoso F, Rigatti P. Low-grade left varicocele in patients over 30 years old:the effect of spermatic vein ligation on fertility. BJU Int. 2000;85(3):305–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Peiró A, Ribas-Maynou J, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Checa MA, Nikolaou A, et al. Multiple determinations of sperm DNA fragmentation show that varicocelectomy is not indicated for infertile patients with subclinical varicocele. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:181396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kucuk EV, Bindayi A, Boylu U, Onol FF, Gumus E. Randomised clinical trial of comparing effects of acupuncture and varicocelectomy on sperm parameters in infertile varicocele patients. Andrologia. 2016;48(10):1080–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Xue B, Shan Y, Cui Y, Tao W, Zhu J, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a single channel versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):159–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun HB, Liu Y, Yan MB, Li ZD, Gui XG. Comparing three different surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012;5(1):12–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barbalias GA, Liatsikos EN, Nikiforidis G, Siablis D. Treatment of varicocele for male infertility: a comparative study evaluating currently used approaches. Eur Urol. 1998;34(5):393–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pajovic B, Radojevic N, Dimitrovski A, Radovic M, Rolovic R, Vukovic M. Advantages of microsurgical varicocelectomy over conventional techniques. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(4):532–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yavetz H, Levy R, Papo J, Yogev L, Paz G, Jaffa AJ, et al. Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality. Int J Androl. 1992;15(4):338–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavallini G, Biagiotti G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Vitali G. Medical therapy of oligoasthenospermia associated with left varicocele. BJU Int. 2003;91(6):513–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yazdani M, Hadi M, Abbasi H, Nourimahdavi K, Khalighinejad P, Mirsattari A, et al. Efficacy of varicocele repair in different age groups. Urology. 2015;86(2):273–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaneko T, Sasaki S, Yanai Y, Umemoto Y, Kohri K. Effect of microsurgical repair of the varicocele on testicular function in adolescence and adulthood. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2007;14(12):1080–3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B, Karasik A, Goldwasser B. Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(1):120–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zylbersztejn DS, Andreoni C, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Borsari L, Souza GHMF, et al. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):92–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Belardin LB, Del Giudice PT, Camargo M, Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Bertolla RP, et al. Alterations in the proliferative/apoptotic equilibrium in semen of adolescents with varicocele. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(12):1657–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Del Giudice PT, Belardin LB, Camargo M, Zylbersztejn DS, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KHM, et al. Determination of testicular function in adolescents with varicocoele - a proteomics approach. Andrology. 2016;4(3):447–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blumer CG, Restelli AE, Giudice PTD, Soler TB, Fraietta R, Nichi M, et al. Effect of varicocele on sperm function and semen oxidative stress. BJU Int. 2012;109(2):259–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1(2):67–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chow S-C. Sample size calculations for clinical trials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2011;3(5):414–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Charles P, Giraudeau B, Dechartres A, Baron G, Ravaud P. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ. 2009;338:b1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Röhrig B, du Prel J-B, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M. Sample size calculation in clinical trials. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2010;107(31–32):552–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Columb MO, Atkinson MS. Statistical analysis: sample size and power estimations. BJA Educ. 2016;16(5):159–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noordzij M, Tripepi G, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Tanck MW, Jager KJ. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(5):1388–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. WHO | WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen [Internet]. [cited February 1st, 2017]. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/9789241547789/en/.

  33. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):163–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Al Bakri A, Lo K, Grober E, Cassidy D, Cardoso JP, Jarvi K. Time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2012;187(1):227–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y-J, Zhang R-Q, Lin Y-J, Zhang R-G, Zhang W-L. Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):307–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lacerda JI, Del Giudice PT, da Silva BF, Nichi M, Fariello RM, Fraietta R, et al. Adolescent varicocele: improved sperm function after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):994–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Camargo M, Intasqui Lopes P, Del Giudice PT, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KHM, Andreoni C, et al. Unbiased label-free quantitative proteomic profiling and enriched proteomic pathways in seminal plasma of adult men before and after varicocelectomy. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2013;28(1):33–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lima SB, Cenedeze MA, Bertolla RP, Filho PAH, Oehninger S, Cedenho AP. Expression of the HSPA2 gene in ejaculated spermatozoa from adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1659–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim KH, Lee JY, Kang DH, Lee H, Seo JT, Cho KS. Impact of surgical varicocele repair on pregnancy rate in subfertile men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Korean J Urol. 2013;54(10):703–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Brugh VM, Lipshultz LI. Male factor infertility: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am. 2004;88(2):367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Carvalho, R.C., Fraietta, R. (2019). What Should Be the Ideal Control Group in Clinical Trials Investigating the Role of Varicocele and Its Treatment on Fertility Outcomes?. In: Esteves, S., Cho, CL., Majzoub, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79101-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79102-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics