Advertisement

What Should Be the Ideal Control Group in Clinical Trials Investigating the Role of Varicocele and Its Treatment on Fertility Outcomes?

  • Renata Cristina de Carvalho
  • Renato Fraietta
Chapter

Abstract

Varicocele is a condition capable of affecting the male fertility potential. The decision of treatment depends on how the disease is harming the individual, but the real effectiveness of an intervention can only be evaluated by studies named clinical trials. A clinical trial evaluates the intervention effectiveness over a specific condition and for that requires a comparative group called control group. There are three different approaches on varicocele treatment studies, and all of them require a control group. When studying the treatment effects over treated and untreated groups, the control group is the one which has not received the treatment. When comparing two different therapies, the control group is the one receiving the gold standard treatment. Studies analyzing the same treatment offered in different points of time consider control group the one which receive treatment on the commonly well-established point in time. Therefore, control group should be the one that best fits for the purpose of a certain study.

Keywords

Varicocele Fertility Treatment Clinical trial Control group 

References

  1. 1.
    Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP, Hassun Filho PA, Lima SB, Ortiz V, Srougi M. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation in adolescents with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):625–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumer CG, Fariello RM, Restelli AE, Spaine DM, Bertolla RP, Cedenho AP. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial activity in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1716–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mori MM, Bertolla RP, Fraietta R, Ortiz V, Cedenho AP. Does varicocele grade determine extent of alteration to spermatogenesis in adolescents? Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1769–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    NIH’s Definition of a Clinical Trial | grants.nih.gov [Internet]. [cited in May 3rd, 2018]. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/policy/clinical-trials/definition.htm.
  6. 6.
    Counsell N, Kirkwood A. Choice of control group in clinical trials: prospective or retrospective. In: Important Considerations for Clinical Trial Methodologies [Internet]. Future Science Ltd; 2013 [cited in May 3rd, 2018]. p. 24–38. (Future Science Book Series). Available at: https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.4155/ebo.13.495.
  7. 7.
    Choice of Control Group and Related Issues in Clinical Trials: ICH [Internet]. [Cited in May 3rd, 2018]. Available at: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/efficacy/efficacy-single/article/choice-of-control-group-and-related-issues-in-clinical-trials.html.
  8. 8.
    Yamamoto M, Hibi H, Hirata Y, Miyake K, Ishigaki T. Effect of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters and pregnancy rate in patients with subclinical varicocele: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Urol. 1996;155(5):1636–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grasso M, Lania C, Castelli M, Galli L, Franzoso F, Rigatti P. Low-grade left varicocele in patients over 30 years old:the effect of spermatic vein ligation on fertility. BJU Int. 2000;85(3):305–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    García-Peiró A, Ribas-Maynou J, Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Checa MA, Nikolaou A, et al. Multiple determinations of sperm DNA fragmentation show that varicocelectomy is not indicated for infertile patients with subclinical varicocele. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:181396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kucuk EV, Bindayi A, Boylu U, Onol FF, Gumus E. Randomised clinical trial of comparing effects of acupuncture and varicocelectomy on sperm parameters in infertile varicocele patients. Andrologia. 2016;48(10):1080–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J, Xue B, Shan Y, Cui Y, Tao W, Zhu J, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a single channel versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):159–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun HB, Liu Y, Yan MB, Li ZD, Gui XG. Comparing three different surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012;5(1):12–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barbalias GA, Liatsikos EN, Nikiforidis G, Siablis D. Treatment of varicocele for male infertility: a comparative study evaluating currently used approaches. Eur Urol. 1998;34(5):393–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pajovic B, Radojevic N, Dimitrovski A, Radovic M, Rolovic R, Vukovic M. Advantages of microsurgical varicocelectomy over conventional techniques. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(4):532–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yavetz H, Levy R, Papo J, Yogev L, Paz G, Jaffa AJ, et al. Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality. Int J Androl. 1992;15(4):338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cavallini G, Biagiotti G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Vitali G. Medical therapy of oligoasthenospermia associated with left varicocele. BJU Int. 2003;91(6):513–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yazdani M, Hadi M, Abbasi H, Nourimahdavi K, Khalighinejad P, Mirsattari A, et al. Efficacy of varicocele repair in different age groups. Urology. 2015;86(2):273–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaneko T, Sasaki S, Yanai Y, Umemoto Y, Kohri K. Effect of microsurgical repair of the varicocele on testicular function in adolescence and adulthood. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2007;14(12):1080–3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B, Karasik A, Goldwasser B. Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(1):120–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zylbersztejn DS, Andreoni C, Del Giudice PT, Spaine DM, Borsari L, Souza GHMF, et al. Proteomic analysis of seminal plasma in adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belardin LB, Del Giudice PT, Camargo M, Intasqui P, Antoniassi MP, Bertolla RP, et al. Alterations in the proliferative/apoptotic equilibrium in semen of adolescents with varicocele. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(12):1657–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Del Giudice PT, Belardin LB, Camargo M, Zylbersztejn DS, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KHM, et al. Determination of testicular function in adolescents with varicocoele - a proteomics approach. Andrology. 2016;4(3):447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blumer CG, Restelli AE, Giudice PTD, Soler TB, Fraietta R, Nichi M, et al. Effect of varicocele on sperm function and semen oxidative stress. BJU Int. 2012;109(2):259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1(2):67–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chow S-C. Sample size calculations for clinical trials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2011;3(5):414–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Charles P, Giraudeau B, Dechartres A, Baron G, Ravaud P. Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review. BMJ. 2009;338:b1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Röhrig B, du Prel J-B, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M. Sample size calculation in clinical trials. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2010;107(31–32):552–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Columb MO, Atkinson MS. Statistical analysis: sample size and power estimations. BJA Educ. 2016;16(5):159–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noordzij M, Tripepi G, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Tanck MW, Jager KJ. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(5):1388–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    WHO | WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen [Internet]. [cited February 1st, 2017]. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/9789241547789/en/.
  33. 33.
    Agarwal A, Sharma R, Harlev A, Esteves SC. Effect of varicocele on semen characteristics according to the new 2010 World Health Organization criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Al Bakri A, Lo K, Grober E, Cassidy D, Cardoso JP, Jarvi K. Time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2012;187(1):227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y-J, Zhang R-Q, Lin Y-J, Zhang R-G, Zhang W-L. Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lacerda JI, Del Giudice PT, da Silva BF, Nichi M, Fariello RM, Fraietta R, et al. Adolescent varicocele: improved sperm function after varicocelectomy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):994–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Camargo M, Intasqui Lopes P, Del Giudice PT, Carvalho VM, Cardozo KHM, Andreoni C, et al. Unbiased label-free quantitative proteomic profiling and enriched proteomic pathways in seminal plasma of adult men before and after varicocelectomy. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2013;28(1):33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lima SB, Cenedeze MA, Bertolla RP, Filho PAH, Oehninger S, Cedenho AP. Expression of the HSPA2 gene in ejaculated spermatozoa from adolescents with and without varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1659–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim KH, Lee JY, Kang DH, Lee H, Seo JT, Cho KS. Impact of surgical varicocele repair on pregnancy rate in subfertile men with clinical varicocele and impaired semen quality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Korean J Urol. 2013;54(10):703–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brugh VM, Lipshultz LI. Male factor infertility: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am. 2004;88(2):367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renata Cristina de Carvalho
    • 1
  • Renato Fraietta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of UrologySao Paulo Federal UniversitySao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations