Advertisement

Should a Varicocele Be Repaired Before Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment?

  • Eric Chung
Chapter

Abstract

The presence of varicocele is the most common correctable factor for male infertility. There is strong evidence to support surgical repair of clinical varicocele to improve semen parameters, decrease seminal oxidative stress and sperm DNA fragmentation, and increase the chance of natural conception. Microscopic varicocelectomy is accepted as the standard of care with higher clinical outcomes and least complication rate. However, it is unclear whether performing varicocelectomy in men with clinical varicocele prior to assisted reproductive technology improves treatment outcome or is more “cost-effective” than just proceeding with assisted reproduction. The following chapter evaluates the clinical evidence pertaining to varicocele in semen parameters (including sperm retrieval rate), the pregnancy rate in natural conception vs. assisted reproduction, and cost analysis of varicocele surgery in the setting of couples who are undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Keywords

Varicocele Azoospermia Oligospermia MicroTESE Cost-effectiveness Successful pregnancy Assisted reproductive technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Gorelick JI, Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:613–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masson P, Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41:129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McIntyre M, Hsieh TC, Lipshultz L. Varicocele repair in the era of modern assisted reproductive techniques. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:517–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marmar JL. The pathophysiology of varicoceles in the light of current molecular and genetic information. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:461–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujisawa M, Yoshida S, Kojima K, Kamidono S. Biocehmical changes in testicular varicocele. Arch Androl. 1989;22:149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benoff S, Gilbert BR. Varicocele and male infertility: part I. Preface. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:1289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macomber D, Sanders MB. The spermatozoa count: its value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. New Engl J Med. 1929;200:981–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tulloch WS. Varicocele in subfertility; results of treatment. Br Med J. 1955;2:356–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, et al. European Association of Urology guideline on male infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evers JL, Collins JA. Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361:1849–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, Agarwal R, Short RA, Benoff S, et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:639–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richardson I, Grotas AB, Nagler HM. Outcomes of varicocelectomy treatment: an updated critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esteves SC, Oliveira FV, Bertolla RP. Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with treated and untreated clinical varicocele. J Urol. 2010;184:1442–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59:455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pasqualotto FF, Braga DP, Figueira RC, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr, et al. Varicocelectomy does not impact pregnancy outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. J Androl. 2012;33:239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mansour Ghanaie M, Asgari SA, et al. Effects of varicocele repair on spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: a randomized clinical trial. Urol J. 2012;9:505–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zini A, Boman J, Baazeem A, Jarvi K, Libman J. Natural history of varicocele management in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kroese AC, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JL. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, et al. Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3090–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chambers GM, Ledger W. The economic implications of multiple pregnancy following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:254–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bouwmans CA, Lintsen BM, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD, Braat DD, et al. A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amor DJ, Halliday J. A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2826–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1803–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alukal JP, Lamb DJ. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) – what are the risks? Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35:277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology. 1997;49:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Penson DF, Paltiel AD, Krumholz HM, Palter S. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for varicocele related infertility. J Urol. 2002;168:2490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005;174:1926–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weedin JW, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2010;183:2309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, Schattman G, Schlegel PN. A decision analysis of treatments for nonobstructive azoospermia associated with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: case series and systematic review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Esteves SC, Varghese AC. Laboratory handling of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa: what can be done to improve sperm injections outcome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5:233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peng J, Zhang Z, Cui W, Yuan Y, Song W, et al. Spontaneous pregnancy rates in Chinese men undergoing microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy and possible preoperative factors affecting the outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:635–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pasqualotto FF, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, Pasqualotto EB, Lucon AM. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocelectomy repair: an update. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:635–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Reichart M, Eltes F, Soffer Y, et al. Sperm ultramorphology as a pathophysiological indicator of spermatogenesis in males suffering from varicocele. Andrologia. 2000;32(3):139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, Rajkhowa M, Miller D, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2908–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2663–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:998–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(10):2908–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Chung
    • 1
  1. 1.AndroUrology CentreSpring HillAustralia

Personalised recommendations