Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is There Any Role for Intraoperative Ultrasound During Varicocele Repair?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varicocele and Male Infertility

  • 616 Accesses

Abstract

Doppler ultrasound assistance has been part of the surgical treatment of varicocele for the past decades. The development of microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy has provided the surgical management of varicocele with precision, by facilitating less postoperative pain and shorter time for recovery and lower rates of complications and recurrence. Nevertheless, vascular anatomy of the subinguinal access represents a challenge and contributes to the technical difficulty of this approach. Branching of the testicular artery is usually seen at the subinguinal level, and the small spermatic arteries are frequently surrounded by a dense complex of adherent veins, requiring special attention of the surgeons. Optical magnification, precise microsurgery skills, and vascular Doppler have been used at this point to achieve maximal preservation of the arterial blood supply to the testes and to aid in the identification of cord structures. Doppler ultrasound represents a major assistance in preserving testicular arterial inflow and may allow a larger number of veins to be identified and ligated. The clinical implication of these findings can be supported by recent studies showing a significant correlation between the total number of veins ligated and the improvements in total sperm motility and sperm concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1 850 000) of three french regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6(6):811–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Madgar I, Weissenberg R, Lunenfeld B, Karasik A, Goldwasser B. Controlled trial of high spermatic vein ligation for varicocele in infertile men. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(1):120–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. World Health Organization. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(6):1289–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study. Urology. 1977;10(5):446–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saleh RA, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Androl. 2002;23(6):737–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70(3):532–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ficarra V, Cerruto MA, Liguori G, et al. Treatment of varicocele in subfertile men: the cochrane review - a contrary opinion. Eur Urol. 2006;49(2):258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marmar JL, Agarwal A, Prabakaran S, et al. Reassessing the value of varicocelectomy as a treatment for male subfertility with a new meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):639–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PALOMO A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique; preliminary report. J Urol. 1949;61(3):604–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;30(1):33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmar JL, DeBenedictis TJ, Praiss D. The management of varicoceles by microdissection of the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring. Fertil Steril. 1985;43(4):583–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003;170(6. Pt 1):2366–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wosnitzer M, Roth JA. Optical magnification and Doppler ultrasound probe for varicocelectomy. Urology. 1983;22(1):24–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silber SJ. Microsurgical aspects of varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1979;31(2):230–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta A, Goldstein M. Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(1):56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cayan S, Kadioglu TC, Tefekli A, Kadioglu A, Tellaloglu S. Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele. Urology. 2000;55(5):750–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan PT, Wright EJ, Goldstein M. Incidence and postoperative outcomes of accidental ligation of the testicular artery during microsurgical varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(2):482–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberger E, Tjioe DY. Spermatogenesis in rat testes after experimental ischemia. Fertil Steril. 1969;20(4):639–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yaman O, Soygur T, Zumrutbas AE, Resorlu B. Results of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children and adolescents. Urology. 2006;68(2):410–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Minevich E, Wacksman J, Lewis AG, Sheldon CA. Inguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in the adolescent: technique and preliminary results. J Urol. 1998;159(3):1022–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grober ED, Chan PT, Zini A, Goldstein M. Microsurgical treatment of persistent or recurrent varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(3):718–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grober ED, O'brien J, Jarvi KA, Zini A. Preservation of testicular arteries during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: clinical considerations. J Androl. 2004;25(5):740–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuda T, Horii Y, Yoshida O. Should the testicular artery be preserved at varicocelectomy? J Urol. 1993;149(5 Pt 2):1357–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Student V, Zátura F, Scheinar J, Vrtal R, Vrána J. Testicle hemodynamics in patients after laparoscopic varicocelectomy evaluated using color Doppler sonography. Eur Urol. 1998;33(1):91–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Belani JS, Yan Y, Naughton CK. Does varicocele grade predict vein number and size at microsurgical subinguinal repair? Urology. 2004;64(1):137–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor KJ, Holland S. Doppler US. Part I. basic principles, instrumentation, and pitfalls. Radiology. 1990;174(2):297–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenberg SH. Doppler ultrasound for localization of testicular artery during varicocelectomy. Urology. 1981;17(5):480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramadan AE, Eldemiry MI. Doppler-controlled varicocelectomy. Br J Urol. 1984;56(4):432–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cocuzza M, Pagani R, Coelho R, Srougi M, Hallak J. The systematic use of intraoperative vascular Doppler ultrasound during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy improves precise identification and preservation of testicular blood supply. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(7):2396–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pasqualotto FF, Lucon AM, de Góes PM, et al. Relationship between the number of veins ligated in a varicocelectomy with testicular volume, hormonal levels and semen parameters outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22(6):245–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shindel AW, Yan Y, Naughton CK. Does the number and size of veins ligated at left-sided microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy affect semen analysis outcomes? Urology. 2007;69(6):1176–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo L, Sun W, Shao G, et al. Outcomes of microscopic subinguinal Varicocelectomy with and without the assistance of Doppler ultrasound: a randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2015;86(5):922–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol. 2005;12(10):892–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

    João Paulo Cardoso & Marcello Antonio Signorelli Cocuzza

Authors
  1. João Paulo Cardoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcello Antonio Signorelli Cocuzza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Antonio Signorelli Cocuzza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ANDROFERT, Andrology & Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

    Sandro C Esteves

  2. S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Chak-Lam Cho

  3. Department of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Weill Cornell Medicine Qatar, Doha, Qatar

    Ahmad Majzoub

  4. Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Ashok Agarwal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cardoso, J.P., Cocuzza, M.A.S. (2019). Is There Any Role for Intraoperative Ultrasound During Varicocele Repair?. In: Esteves, S., Cho, CL., Majzoub, A., Agarwal, A. (eds) Varicocele and Male Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79101-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79102-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation