Advertisement

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Varicocele Repair and Assisted Reproductive Technology

  • Darren J. Bryk
  • Sarah C. VijEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The association between varicocele and male infertility is well-established, although the exact mechanism by which varicoceles cause infertility in men is debated. Surgical correction of varicoceles in men with infertility and abnormal semen parameters has been shown to improve semen parameters in most men. Over the last few decades, assisted reproductive technology (ART), most notably, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), has become a highly utilized approach to achieve pregnancy for couples with infertility. With ART options available to many couples, one must consider the most cost-effective mode of achieving pregnancy in infertile couples. This chapter examines the relationship of varicocelectomy and ART from the cost perspective. Infertile men who undergo varicocelectomy are often candidates for less invasive and less costly forms of ART. Moreover, for those men who still require ICSI after varicocele repair, the pregnancy and live birth rates are improved compared to men who use ICSI without varicocele repair. Lastly, varicocelectomy in men with varicocele-associated infertility is more cost-effective than proceeding directly to ART for infertility management.

Keywords

Varicocelectomy Varicocele repair Varicocele-associated infertility Assisted reproductive technology Intracytoplasmic sperm injection Cost-effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Masson P, Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(1):129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi WS, Kim SW. Current issues in varicocele management: a review. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(1):12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubin L, Amelar RD. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1971;22(8):469–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, et al. The prevalence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular atrophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int. 2000;86(4):490–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clavijo RI, Carrasquillo R, Ramasamy R. Varicoceles: prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):364–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lundy SD, Sabanegh ES Jr. Varicocele management for infertility and pain: a systematic review. Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, et al. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study. Urology. 1977;10(5):446–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kass EJ, Belman AB. Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol. 1987;137(3):475–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Su LM, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN. The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone levels in infertile men with varicoceles. J Urol. 1995;154(5):1752–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evers JH, Collins J, Clarke J. Surgery or embolisation for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000479.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krause W, Muller HH, Schafer H, et al. Does treatment of varicocele improve male fertility? Results of the ‘Deutsche Varikozelenstudie’, a multicentre study of 14 collaborating centres. Andrologia. 2002;34(3):164–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, et al. Update on treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2147–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarow JP, Sharlip ID, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1556–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cayan S, Erdemir F, Ozbey I, et al. Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies? J Urol. 2002;167(4):1749–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alukal JP, Lamb DJ. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)–what are the risks? Urol Clin North Am. 2008;35(2):277–88, ix–x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kamal KM, Jarvi K, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology: influence of initial semen quality on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(5):1013–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Samplaski MK, Lo KC, Grober ED, et al. Varicocelectomy to “upgrade” semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(4):609–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. A critical analysis. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21(3):517–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Esteves SC, Oliveira FV, Bertolla RP. Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with treated and untreated clinical varicocele. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1442–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li F, Yamaguchi K, Okada K, et al. Significant improvement of sperm DNA quality after microsurgical repair of varicocele. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2012;58(5):274–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smit M, Romijn JC, Wildhagen MF, et al. Decreased sperm DNA fragmentation after surgical varicocelectomy is associated with increased pregnancy rate. J Urol. 2013;189(1 Suppl):S146–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang YJ, Zhang RQ, Lin YJ, et al. Relationship between varicocele and sperm DNA damage and the effect of varicocele repair: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25(3):307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zini A, Azhar R, Baazeem A, et al. Effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on human sperm chromatin and DNA integrity: a prospective trial. Int J Androl. 2011;34(1):14–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kohn TP, Kohn JR, Pastuszak AW. Varicocelectomy before assisted reproductive technology: are outcomes improved? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):385–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pasqualotto FF, Braga DP, Figueira RC, et al. Varicocelectomy does not impact pregnancy outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. J Androl. 2012;33(2):239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gokce MI, Gulpinar O, Suer E, et al. Effect of performing varicocelectomy before intracytoplasmic sperm injection on clinical outcomes in non-azoospermic males. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013;45(2):367–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Esteves SC, Roque M, Agarwal A. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in men with treated and untreated varicocele: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):254–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, et al. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol. 1999;162(3 Pt 1):737–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(1):71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ustuner M, Yilmaz H, Yavuz U, et al. Varicocele repair improves testicular histology in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:709452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Inci K, Hascicek M, Kara O, et al. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and treated and untreated varicocele. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1500–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Haydardedeoglu B, Turunc T, Kilicdag EB, et al. The effect of prior varicocelectomy in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes: a retrospective pilot study. Urology. 2010;75(1):83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Roque M, et al. Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):246–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kirby EW, Wiener LE, Rajanahally S, et al. Undergoing varicocele repair before assisted reproduction improves pregnancy rate and live birth rate in azoospermic and oligospermic men with a varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takeshima T, Yumura Y, Kuroda S, et al. Effect of varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Reprod Med. 2017;62(5–6):311–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Youssef T, Abd-Elaal E, Gaballah G, et al. Varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: is it beneficial? Int J Surg. 2009;7(4):356–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neumann PJ, Gharib SD, Weinstein MC. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(4):239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Donovan JF Jr, DiBaise M, Sparks AE, et al. Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort? Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):387–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Collins JA, Bustillo M, Visscher RD, et al. An estimate of the cost of in vitro fertilization services in the United States in 1995. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(3):538–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dupree JM. Insurance coverage for male infertility care in the United States. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(3):339–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Elliott PA, Hoffman J, Abad-Santos M, et al. Out-of-pocket costs for men undergoing infertility care and associated financial Strai. Urol Pract. 2016;3(4):256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dubin JM, Greer AB, Kohn TP, et al. Men with severe oligospermia appear to benefit from varicocele repair: a cost-effectiveness analysis of assisted reproductive technology. Urology. 2018;111:99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dupree JM, Dickey RM, Lipshultz LI. Inequity between male and female coverage in state infertility laws. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(6):1519–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wu AK, Odisho AY, Washington SL 3rd, et al. Out-of-pocket fertility patient expense: data from a multicenter prospective infertility cohort. J Urol. 2014;191(2):427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schlegel PN. Is assisted reproduction the optimal treatment for varicocele-associated male infertility? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Urology. 1997;49(1):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Penson DF, Paltiel AD, Krumholz HM, et al. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for varicocele related infertility. J Urol. 2002;168(6):2490–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005;174(5):1926–31. discussion 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ombelet W, Dhont N, Thijssen A, et al. Semen quality and prediction of IUI success in male subfertility: a systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(3):300–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, et al. A decision analysis of treatments for nonobstructive azoospermia associated with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pasqualotto FF, Sobreiro BP, Hallak J, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after varicocelectomy repair: an update. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):635–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chiles KA, Schlegel PN. Cost-effectiveness of varicocele surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):259–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sonmez MG, Haliloglu AH. Role of varicocele treatment in assisted reproductive technologies. Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):188–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cleveland Clinic FoundationGlickman Urological and Kidney InstituteClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations