Descriptive Disenchantment and Prescriptive Disillusionment: Myths, Mysticism, and Psychotherapeutic Interpretation

  • Ira Helderman
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Mysticism book series (INTERMYST)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the differences between how religious studies scholars and psychotherapists approach the subject of mysticism. Writing from my dual location, as both religious studies scholar and practicing clinician, I consider the proposition that scholars only offer descriptions, explanations, and interpretations of mystical experiences, while psychotherapists make prescriptions as to whether such experiences represent healthy or unhealthy stages of human development. Throughout the chapter, I trace distinctions between descriptive and prescriptive treatments of the topics of mysticism and mystical experience from both therapists and scholars. Ultimately, we will find that many of the prescriptions that psychotherapists make when it comes to mystical experience may more rightly be considered descriptions of a perceived reality, a set of natural processes they believe they only observe. Conversely, we will find that scholars’ descriptions, explanations, and interpretations of mystical experience are also often highly prescriptive. It is simply that the prescriptions they advance are meant to achieve different ends from symptom reduction in individual patients. When scholars analyze the discourse of mystical experience, they often advance implicit and explicit claims about what is more or less beneficial, perhaps even more or less healthy, for society as a whole. Finally, I show that these considerations are fundamental to the discourse surrounding the entire subject of mysticism as both scholars and psychotherapists deliberate on the relationship between experiences and their interpretation. Ultimately, an examination of the distinctions between scholars and psychotherapists’ treatments of the mystical tells us something important about the discipline of religious studies as a whole and, along the way, a thing or two about psychotherapy as well.

References

  1. Bender, Courtney. 2010. The New Metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American Religious Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carrette, Jeremy, and Richard King. 2005. Selling Spirituality: The Silent Takeover of Religion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Casanova, José. 2006. “Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective.” The Hedgehog Review 8: 1–22.Google Scholar
  4. Eigen, Michael. 1993. The Psychotic Core. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1998. The Psychoanalytic Mystic. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2009. Flames from the Unconscious: Trauma, Madness, and Faith. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2010. Eigen in Seoul: Volume One, Madness and Murder. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1999. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, Sigmund. 1930. Civilization and Its Discontents. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXI (1927–1931): The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents, and Other Works. Translated and edited by James Strachey, 59–145. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fromm, Erich. 1950. Psychoanalysis and Religion. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  11. Harrison, Peter. 2015. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helderman, Ira. 2016. “Drawing the Boundaries Between ‘Religion’ and ‘Secular’ in Psychotherapists’ Approaches to Buddhist Traditions in the United States.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 84 (4): 937–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helderman, Ira. 2018. Mindful of “Religion”: Psychotherapists and Buddhist Traditions in the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  14. Homans, Peter. 1989. The Ability to Mourn: Disillusionment and the Social Origins of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. James, William. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Nature (Being the Gifford Lectures on Natural Religion Delivered at Edinburgh in 1901–1902). 2010 First Library of America Edition. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Jantzen, Grace M. 1995. Power, Gender and Christian Mysticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Josephson, Jason Ānanda. 2012. The Invention of Religion in Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2017. The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, Steven T. 1978. “Language, Epistemology, and Mysticism.” In Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis, edited by Steven T. Katz, 75–100. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. King, Richard. 1999. Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, India and “The Mystic East”. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kripal, Jeffrey. 2007. The Serpent’s Gift: Gnostic Reflections on the Study of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. McCutcheon, Russell. 2008. “A Gift with Diminished Returns.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (3): 748–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merkur, Dan. 2010. Explorations of the Psychoanalytic Mystics. Amsterdam: Rodolphi.Google Scholar
  24. Nongbri, Brent. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parsons, William. 1998. “The Oceanic Feeling Revisited.” The Journal of Religion 78 (4): 501–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 1999. The Enigma of the Oceanic Feeling: Revisioning the Psychoanalytic Theory of Mysticism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2008. “Psychologia Perennis and the Academic Study of Mysticism.” In Mourning Religion, edited by William Parsons, Diane Jonte-Pace, and Susan Henking, 97–123. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  28. Proudfoot, Wayne. 1985. Religious Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schmidt, Leigh Eric. 2003. “The Making of Modern ‘Mysticism.’” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 71 (2): 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Segal, Robert A. 2011. “Mysticism and Psychoanalysis.” Religious Studies Review 37 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ira Helderman
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations