Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Extra-Coronal Restorations

Part of the book series: BDJ Clinician’s Guides ((BDJCG))

  • 2368 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will emphasise the need to:

  • Be alert to restorations which may be used as a more conservative alternative to crowns

  • Carefully evaluate clinical studies of restorations and be aware of the factors which may bias outcomes

  • Identify factors (including bruxism) which adversely affect veneer performance

  • Be aware of the high clinical success rate of ceramic inlays and onlays

  • Be cautious when using composite inlays and onlays in bruxists and in patients with a previous high caries rate

  • Manage expectations when placing implant crowns and arrange follow-up for any mechanical issues and supportive peri-implant care, particularly in patients susceptible to peri-implant disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. British Society for Restorative Dentistry. Crowns, fixed bridges and dental implants guidelines. Available from: http://www.bsrd.org.uk/guidelines/crownandbridge.pdf. Accessed May 2017.

  2. Prescribing and Primary Care HaSCIC. NHS Dental Statistics England, 2013/14. In: Centre HaSCI, editor. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Primary Care Domain HaSCIC. NHS Dental Statistics England 2014/15. In: Centre HaSCI, editor. Health and Social Care Information Centre, Government Statistical Centre; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steele JG, O’Sullivan I. Executive summary: adult dental health survey 2009. In: Centre THaSCI, editor. London: The NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee Project 2/98—FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I) and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):121–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies In: Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patel DR, O’Brien T, Petrie A, Petridis H. A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:421–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:209–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS. Ten-year outcome of crowns placed within the General Dental Services in England and Wales. J Dent. 2009;37:12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke FJ, Lucarotti PS. Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. J Dent. 2009;37:31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burke FJ. Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24:257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox DR. Regression models and life Tables. B 34:187–220. J R Stat Soc. 1972;B32:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  14. FDI. FDI policy statement. Recommendations for clinical trials of restorative materials. 2008 [cited July 2016]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/yd6o2tgp.

  15. Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31:603–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015;31:624–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Fan D, Swain MV, Zhao K. A systematic review of all-ceramic crowns: clinical fracture rates in relation to restored tooth type. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:441–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jokstad A. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of single crowns retained with resin-modified glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:411–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehmann F, Spiegl K, Eickemeyer G, Rammelsberg P. Adhesively luted, metal-free composite crowns after five years. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11:493–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald A, Setchell D. Developing a tooth restorability index. Dent Update. 2005;32:343–4, 346–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ireland RA. Dictionary of dentistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent. 1998;26:345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Layton DM, Clarke M, Walton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:590–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Layton DM, Walton TR. The up to 21-year clinical outcome and survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers: accounting for clustering. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:604–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beier US, Kapferer I, Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1335 all-ceramic restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:70–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burke FJ. Four year performance of dentine-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Br Dent J. 2007;202:269–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:111–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petridis HP, Zekeridou A, Malliari M, Tortopidis D, Koidis P. Survival of ceramic veneers made of different materials after a minimum follow-up period of five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012;7:138–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sulaiman TA, Delgado AJ, Donovan TE. Survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations at 4 years: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:364–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Clinical longevity of ceramic laminate veneers bonded to teeth with and without existing composite restorations up to 40 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:823–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dunne SM, Millar J. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J. 1993;175:317–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2002;193:73–6, 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent. 1998;26:563–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wakiaga J, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD004347.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. Composite laminate veneers: a clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:439–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. BDA. Bonded composites versus ceramic veneers. British Dental Association. 2014 [cited June 2018]. Available from: https://tinyurl.com/y9v5bszd.

  37. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized clinical trial of indirect resin composite and ceramic veneers: up to 3-year follow-up. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:181–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van Dijken JW, Hoglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent. 1998;26:219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: part 4. An overview of the restorative techniques and dental materials commonly applied for the management of tooth wear. Br Dent J. 2012;212:169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nohl FS, King PA, Harley KE, Ibbetson RJ. Retrospective survey of resin-retained cast-metal palatal veneers for the treatment of anterior palatal tooth wear. Quintessence Int. 1997;28:7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chana H, Kelleher M, Briggs P, Hooper R. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded gold alloy veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, Erdem V, Seven N, Demirbuga S. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18:e521–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FB, Braga MM, Sesma N, Ozcan M. Survival rate of resin and ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95(9):985–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:375–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nandini S. Indirect resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:184–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D’Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M, et al. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:615–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Huth KC, Chen HY, Mehl A, Hickel R, Manhart J. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years. J Dent. 2011;39:478–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing preparations placed by dental students: results after 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:399–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93:943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Patient risk factors’ influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res. 2013;92:78s–83s.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bartlett D, Sundaram G. An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:613–7.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bartlett D, Varma S. A retrospective audit of the outcome of composites used to restore worn teeth. Br Dent J. 2017;223:33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2013;29:1209–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Steele J, Fuller L, Morgan M. 4: Complexity and maintenance—a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. In: Centre THaSCI, editor; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  57. American Academy of Implant Dentistry. Dental implants facts and figures. [cited July 2016]. Available from: http://aaid.com/about/Press_Room/Dental_Implants_FAQ.html.

  58. Dental implants facts and figures. American Academy of Implant Dentistry website. [cited May 2015]. Available from: http://www.aaid.com/about/Press_Room/Dental_Implants_FAQ.html.

  59. Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):308–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Albrektsson T, Donos N, Working G. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):63–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mir-Mari J, Mir-Orfila P, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases. A cross-sectional study based on a private practice environment. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39:490–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Monje A, Aranda L, Diaz KT, Alarcon MA, Bagramian RA, Wang HL, et al. Impact of maintenance therapy for the prevention of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2016;95:372–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Pirc M, Dragan IF. The key points of maintenance therapy for dental implants: a literature review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017;38:e5–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Sheffield, UK

    Claire Field

  2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle University School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Heidi Bateman, Richard Holliday & Robert Wassell

Authors
  1. Claire Field
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi Bateman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Holliday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Wassell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Field .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle University School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

    Robert Wassell

  2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Newcastle University School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

    Francis Nohl

  3. Newcastle University School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

    Jimmy Steele

  4. Edinburgh Dental Institute, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    Angus Walls

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Field, C., Bateman, H., Holliday, R., Wassell, R. (2019). Clinical Performance. In: Wassell, R., Nohl, F., Steele, J., Walls, A. (eds) Extra-Coronal Restorations. BDJ Clinician’s Guides. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79092-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79093-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation