Abstract
The double thesis sketched in broad strokes in this essay will be that modus vivendi conceptions do not qualify as viable alternatives to political liberalism. In order to be normatively plausible, modus vivendi conceptions depend on a (politically) liberal framework and on the normative reasoning justifying it. Within such a liberal framework, however, modus vivendi theory and modus vivendi institutions are necessary. Modus vivendi theory is analysed to be a normatively inconsistent approach that cannot be successful in its attempt to undermine liberalism’s aspiration to occupy a privileged normative position vis-à-vis other kinds of regimes. Pluralist theories of the modus vivendi kind, dissociating themselves from normative individualism which takes individuals as the core elements of the political and legal processes, are in danger of destroying the very base of a sound political idea of pluralism. The essay especially questions how much realism is found in the “realist turn” in recent political theory, of which the modus vivendi approach is part, given systematic underestimation of the legal system in modus vivendi theorizing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I would like to thank the participants of the University of Münster conference on Modus Vivendi (July 8–10, 2015) and especially Ulrich Willems and Otto Fuchs for their critical comments.
References
Bacon, M. (2010). Breaking up is hard to do: John Gray’s complicated relationship with the liberal project. Social Theory and Practice, 36(3), 365–384.
Bellamy, R. (1999). Liberalism and pluralism. London: Routledge.
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002 [1958]. Two concepts of liberty. In: Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Incorporating four essays on liberty (Henry Hardy, ed.), 166–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fossen, T. (2018). Modus vivendi beyond the social contract: Peace, justice, and survival in realist political theory. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Friedman, L. M. (1994). Is there a modern legal culture? Ratio Juris, 7(2), 117–131.
Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 385–411.
Gray, J. (1998). Where pluralists and liberals part company. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 6(1), 17–36.
Gray, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gray, J. (2006). Reply to critics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9(2), 323–347.
Gray, J. (2007 [1995]). Enlightenment’s wake. Politics and culture at the close of the modern age. London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Horton, J. (2006). John Gray and the political theory of modus vivendi. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9(2), 155–169.
Horton, J. (2010). Realism, moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 431–448.
Horton, J. (2017). What might it mean for political theory to be more ‘realistic’? Philosophia, 45(2), 487–501.
Horton, J. (2018). Modus vivendi and political legitimacy. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kant, I. (1996 [1797]). The metaphysics of morals. Part I: Metaphysical principles of the doctrine of right. In I. Kant (Ed.), Practical philosophy (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, P. (2005). Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lafont, C. (2017). Citizens in robes: The place of religion in constitutional democracies. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 43(4-5), 453–464.
Larmore, C. (1999). The moral basis of political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 96, 599–627.
Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of society [Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft] (R. Barrett, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
McCabe, D. (2010). Modus vivendi liberalism. Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCabe, D. (2018). Modus vivendi as a global political morality. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
Newey, G. (2006). Gray’s blues: Pessimism as a political project. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 9(2), 263–284.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Rawls’s political liberalism. A reassessment. Ratio Juris, 24, 1–24.
Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review, 29(3), 339–357.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rossi, E. (2018). Can modus vivendi save liberalism from moralism? A critical assessment of John Gray’s political realism. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(10), 689–701.
Sala, R. (2018). Modus vivendi and the motivations for compliance. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Sleat, M. (2018). Modus vivendi and legitimacy: Some sceptical thoughts. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wall, S. (2018). Liberalism and modus vivendi politics. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wendt, F. (2013a). Introduction: Compromising on justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 475–480.
Wendt, F. (2013b). Peace beyond Compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 573–593.
Wendt, F. (2016). Compromise, peace and public justification: Political morality beyond justice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wendt, F. (2018). Why theorize modus vivendi? In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wenner, F. (2018). Legitimacy and modus vivendi theory. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Westphal, M. (2018). Institutions of modus vivendi politics. In J. Horton, M. Westphal, & U. Willems (Eds.), The political theory of modus vivendi. Heidelberg: Springer.
Willems, U. (2003). Religion als Privatsache? Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit dem liberalen Prinzip einer strikten Trennung von Politik und Religion. In M. Minkenberg & U. Willems (Eds.), Politik und Religion. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 33/2002 (pp. 88–112). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Willems, U. (2012). Normative Pluralität und Kontingenz als Herausforderungen politischer Theorie. Prolegomena zur Theorie eines Politischen Pluralismus. In K. Toens & U. Willems (Eds.), Politik und Kontingenz (pp. 265–301). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed. Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wolterstorff, N. (1997). Why we should reject what liberalism tells us about speaking and acting in public for religious reasons. In P. Weithman (Ed.), Religion and contemporary liberalism (pp. 162–181). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gutmann, T. (2019). Modus Vivendi in a Liberal Framework. In: Horton, J., Westphal, M., Willems, U. (eds) The Political Theory of Modus Vivendi. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79078-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79078-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79077-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79078-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)