Abstract
Since D’Arcy Thompson’s pioneering work On Growth and Form published in 1942, continuous efforts have been made in Western academic fields to understand and capture forms and evaluate their similarities and differences, their continuities (invariants) and their discontinuities through time. Mathematics has been used intensively to capture forms such as those of cells, gases and animal or plant shapes. It has also been used by anthropologists to capture what has been interpreted as the forms or structure of languages, myths and symbols. That is, mathematics has supported the attempt to give a form to non-tangible, immaterial human expressions and thoughts. Organizations and companies also feel the need to define their structure or the shape taken by their relationships and interconnections. Here again, mathematics is at work in this attempt to give a form to how they function. This paper focuses mainly on the Western quest for form and structure and gives some examples of the methods used to address this quest. In so doing, it formulates the following interdisciplinary research question: can we think about the transformation of functions which do not have any intrinsic shape? How does the idea of “environmental shape” captures the function of sharing in order to renew our perception of sustainable development?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Axelrod, R. (1976). The structure of decision: Cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blanc, N. (2016). Les formes de l’environnement. Genève: Metis Presses.
Brunet, J., & Contré, O. (2014). Le concept du monospace: la simplexité dans la construction architecturale. In Complexité-Simplexité, Actes du Colloque (pp. 179–186). Paris: Collège de France.
Ferreira da Souza, R. C. (2014). Ephemeral spaces. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Kirkwood, C. (1998). System dynamic methods. Arizona: University of Arizona.
Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1), 65–75.
Lévi-Strauss, C., & Eribon, D. (1990). De près et de loin. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Paris: Plon.
McCulloch, W., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.
Merton, R. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press.
Monod, J. (1970). Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Seuil.
Nagy, G. (1968). State of the art in pattern recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE (Vol. 56, pp. 836–862).
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, D’A. W. (1917). On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turing, A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 237(641), 37–72
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minzoni, A. (2018). Opening in Conclusion: An Anthropological Approach to Transformation—Shaping Shapes. In: da Costa, P., Attias, D. (eds) Towards a Sustainable Economy . Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79060-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79060-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79059-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79060-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)