Advertisement

A Prospective Analysis of CO2 Emissions for Electric Vehicles and the Energy Sectors in China, France and the US (2010–2050)

  • Wenhui Tian
  • Pascal da Costa
Chapter
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

Abstract

Within the landscape of global warming and energy transition, many countries have announced nationally aligned contributions in reducing their CO2 emissions (COP21 and 22, in 2015 and 2016 respectively). With the aim of evaluating the maturing and the success of these targets, technology roadmaps are necessary and serve a twofold function in the evaluative process. They serve as points of comparisons between each other and they are yardsticks by which to measure change for the 2050 horizon.

In this chapter, technology roadmaps are studied for three representative countries: China, France and the United States of America. The roadmaps cover the sectors responsible for the greatest part of CO2 emissions, i.e. the power, transport, residence and industry sectors. They also cover the impact of the main technologies, i.e. carbon capture and storage, energy efficiency and electric vehicles. This chapter thus assesses the future of energy trends and especially shows that the deployment of electric vehicles shall prove crucial for reaching the commitments towards contributions at national levels.

Keywords

Energy transition Technology roadmaps Sectoral emission modeling STIRPAT model Support vector regression 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank J.C. Bocquet and the LGI/CentraleSupélec members for constant supports and especially J. Liu for reviewing our regressions.

References

  1. ADEME. (2014). Chiffres clés climat air énergie, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. Akimoto, K. (2016). Evaluations on the emission reduction efforts of Nationally Determined Contributions in cost metrics. Marrakech COP22: Japan Pavilion.Google Scholar
  3. Alazard-Toux, N., Criqui, P., Devezeaux De Lavergne, J.-G., Hache, E., Le Net, E., Lorne, D., Mathy, S., Menanteau, P., Safa, H., Teissier, O., & Topper, B. (2014). Les scénarios de transition énergétique de l’ANCRE. Revue de l’Energie, 619, 189–210.Google Scholar
  4. Boulanger, P.-M., & Bréchet, T. (2005). Models for policy-making in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecological Economics, 55, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao, L. (2003). Support vector machines experts for time series forecasting. Neurocomputing, 51, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, W. (2005). The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO modeling. Energy Policy, 33, 885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297.Google Scholar
  8. ERI. (2009). China’s low carbon development path by 2050: Scenario analysisi of energy demand and carbon emissions.Google Scholar
  9. Gao, J. B., Gunn, S. R., Harris, C. J., & Brown, M. (2002). A probabilistic framework for SVM regression and error bar estimation. Machine Learning, 46, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong, W. C. (2010). Application of chaotic ant swarm optimization in electric load forecasting. Energy Policy, 38, 5830–5839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. HSBC. (2011, January 4). The world in 2050: Quantifying the shift in the global economy. HSBC Global Economics.Google Scholar
  12. IEA. (2008). Energy techonology prospective 2008: In support of the G8 Plan of Action, Scenario & Strategies to 2050. OECD.Google Scholar
  13. IEA. (2011). Technology roadmaps: China wind energy development roadmap to 2050. OECD/IEA and Energy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  14. IEA. (2012, November 13). CO2 emission from fuel combustion, highlights. 2012 Edition.Google Scholar
  15. IEA. (2014, June 1). Energy technology perspectives 2014: Harnessing electricity’s potential. OECD, Energy Technology Perspectives 2014.Google Scholar
  16. IPCC. (2005). IPCC special report: Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kaya, Y. (1989). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios. IPCC Response Strategies Working Group Memorandum.Google Scholar
  20. Klaassen, G., & Riahi, K. (2007). Internalizing externalities of electricity generation: An analysis with MESSAGE-MACRO. Energy Policy, 35, 815–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, J., Seraoui, R., Vitelli, V., & Zio, E. (2013). Nuclear power plant components condition monitoring by probabilistic support vector machine. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 56, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MEDDE & CDC Climat Recherche. (2015). Les chiffres clés du climat France et Monde.Google Scholar
  23. RITE. (2015). RITE GHG mitigation assessment model DNE21+, system analysis group.Google Scholar
  24. Saveyn, B., Paroussos, L., & Ciscar, J.-C. (2012). Economic analysis of a low carbon path to 2050: A case for China, India and Japan. Energy Economics, 34(3), 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: UNFCCC. (2015). INDCs as communicated by Parties.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, J., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Sun, D. (2009). A trend fixed on firstly and seasonal adjustment model combined with the ɛ-SVR for short-term forecasting of electricity demand. Energy Policy, 37, 4901–4909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waxman, H.A., & Markey, E.J. (2009). The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupelecUniversité Paris-SaclayGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations