Government Ownership of Roads and Railroads—Why?



In this chapter, an introduction to the subject of government ownership of transport infrastructure assets is given. Some of the traditional arguments for and against government intervention into the transport infrastructure sector are reflected. The conclusion is that there has been a discussion on transport infrastructure and the organization and financing of these systems since long. Often governments have owned the systems. But today many of the traditional arguments in favor of government intervention seem to be questioned. Whether this exemplifies a stronger challenge to the government’s role than at many times before, or is primarily another example of a challenge that will be met by the government adjusting its role to the new situation, is still to be seen. In order to better understand transport infrastructure and its role in the economies and in the development of modern societies, a perspective combining aspects of time, scope, and scale is important.


  1. Bogart, D. (2009). Nationalizations and the Development of Transport Systems: Cross-Country Evidence from Railroad Networks, 1860–1912. The Journal of Economic History, 69(01), 202–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulletinen. (2012). Nr 2, 2012, Enskild väghållning i svensk historia 1200–2010, based on Blomkvist, Pär Om förvaltning av gemensamma resurser: Enskild väghållning och allmänningens dilemma i svensk historia 1200–2010 (Managing Common Pool Resources: Road Keeping and the Dilemma of the Commons in Swedish History 1200–2010), Division of Industrial Dynamics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (Stockholm 2010), TRITA-IEO 2010:06.Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA, USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA, USA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clifton, J., Lanthier, P., & Schröter, H. (2011). Regulating and Deregulating the Public Utilities 1830–2010. Business History, 53(5), 659–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hasselgren, B. (2013). The Swedish Government as Owner of Transport Infrastructure. Policy Formation from the 1930s to the 2010s. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 16(4), 49–71.Google Scholar
  7. Heckscher, E. F. (1907). Till belysning af jernvägarnas betydelse för Sveriges ekonomiska utveckling. Stockholm: Centraltryckeriet.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, D., & Turner, C. (2007). Strategy and Policy for Trans-European Networks. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, D. B. (2012). Knowledge and Coordination—A Liberal Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Millward, R. (2005). Private and Public Enterprise in Europe. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Millward, R. (2011). Public Enterprise in the Modern Western World: An Historical Analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(4), 378–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schön, D. A. (1971). Beyond the Stable State. Public and Private Learning in a Changing Society. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  14. Vickerman, R. (2007). Recent Evolution of Research into the Wider Economic Benefits of Transport Infrastructure Investments (OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers No. 2007/9). OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations