Abstract
By taking a socio-political stance towards the positive adoption of iPads to advance mathematical learning, this paper explores mathematical practices in a Swedish preschool class (children aged six to seven) where each young student was provided with a digital tablet. The focus is on how the students’ agency or boundaries emerge in the relational practices between the students and the materials: hands-on-manipulatives as well as digital technology. The paper adopts a socio-material perspective for the analysis of the practices. Both digital technology and the more traditional hands-on-manipulatives are exemplifying materials in the intertwining of human and non-human agency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Different authors vary the term to socio-materiality or social materiality. In this chapter, I write sociomateriality except when referring to a certain author. The term relates to social interaction in a technological world (Leonardi et al. 2012).
References
Amit, M., & Fried, M. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 145–168.
Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2016). Language repertoires for mathematical and other discourses. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1166–1172). Tucson, USA.
Agélii Genlott, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers & Education, 67, 98–104.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matters. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics of the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke Universal.
Baroody, A. J. (1989). Manipulatives don’t come with guarantees. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(2), 4–5.
Bernstein, B. (1971). Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (Class, code and control) (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bruner, J. S. (1974). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Calder, N. (2011). Processing mathematics through digital technologies: The primary years. Rotterdam: Sense.
De Freitas, E. (2017). Karen Barad’s quantum ontology and posthuman ethics: Rethinking the concept of relationality. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 741–748.
De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 135–151). Cham: Springer.
Driscoll, M. J. (1983). Research within reach: Elementary school mathematics and reading. St. Louis: CEMREL.
Drotner, K. (2009). Children and digital media: Online, on site, on the go. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 360–373). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gutiérrez, A., & Boero, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Rotterdam: Sense.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). What is ethnography? Ethnography, principles in practice. New York: Routledge.
Hornecker, E., & Burr, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. Proceedings of HCI, April 22–28, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Accessed 10 Oct 2016. http://www.ehornecker.de/Papers/FrameworkCHI.pdf.
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.
Johri, A. (2011). The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 207–217.
Jönsson, P., Lingefjärd, T., & Mehanovic, S. (2010). IKT I matematikundervisningen. Datorn i Utbildningen nr 2. Accessed 25 Aug 2016. http://www.diu.se/nr2-10/nr2-10.asp?artikel=s33.
Kallinikos, P. M., Leonardi, B. A., & Nardi, J. K. (2012). The challenge of materiality: Origins, scope, and prospects. In P. M. Kallinikos, B. A. Leonardi, & J. K. Nardi (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kjällander, S. (2012). APPKNapp – peka, lek & lär i förskolan. [APPbutton – point, play & learn in preschool]. Report from a researcha project in cooperation between Botkyrka commune and Stockholm University. Accessed 14 Apr 2015. http://appknapp.se/slutrapport/SV_rapport_appknapp_slutversion.pdf.
Kjällander, S., & Moinian, F. (2014). Digital tablets and applications in preschool: Preschoolers’ creative transformation of didactic design. Designs for Learning, 7(1), 10–33.
Labinowics, E. (1985). Learning from children: New beginnings for teaching numeral thinking. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (Eds.). (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meaney, T., & Lange, T. (2013). Learners in transition between contexts. In K. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 169–202). New York: Springer.
Meyer, B. (2013). Tablets in the classroom: Improvisational rhythms and change through bricolage. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013), pp. 241–250.
Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 175–197.
Norén, E., & Andersson, A. (2016). Multilingual students’ agency in mathematics classrooms. In A. Halai & P. Clarkson (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Issues for policy, practice and teacher education (pp. 109–124). Sense: Rotterdam.
Dagens Nyheter (2012). Surfplattor ersätter skolböcker i Sollentuna. [Surf tablets replace school books in Sollentuna]. Accessed 12 Oct 2015 http://www.dn.se/sthlm/surfplattor-ersatter-skolbocker-i-sollentuna.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.
Palmer, A. (2011). “How many sums can I do”? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 3–18.
Palmér, H., & Ebbelind, A. (2013). What is possible to learn? Using iPads in teaching mathematics in preschool. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Mathematics learning across the life span (pp. 425–432).
Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency & science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Preciado-Babb, P. (2012). Incorporating the iPad2 in the mathematics classroom: Extending the mind into the collective. iJEP, 2(2), 23–29.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Rosa, M., & Lerman, S. (2011). Researching online mathematics education: Opening a space for virtual learner identities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 69–90.
Roth, W.-M. (2010). Incarnation: Radicalizing the embodiment of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 8–17.
Sandvik, M., Smørdal, O., & Østerud, S. (2012). Exploring iPads in practitioners’ repertoires for language learning and literacy practices in kindergarten. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 7(3), 204–221.
Sinclair, N. (2014). Generations of research on new technologies in mathematics education. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33, 166–178.
Sinclair, N. (2016). Mathematics education as a matter of technology. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Singapore: Springer.
Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 81–99.
Skolverket (2013). Accessed 20 Feb 2013 http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/in_english/the_swedish_education_system/2.879.
Stockholm Municipality (2013, June). Utvärdering av Ipad-satsning i Stockholms stad Juni 2013. Evaluation of Ipad investment in Stockholm city.
Suydam, M. N. (1985). Research on instructional materials for mathematics. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Svenljunga (2017). Digitalt lärande. [Digital learning]. Accessed 11 Sep 2017 http://www.svenljunga.se/download/18.36f5f89a15aa415906db93/14901027 76691/DetGodasteLivet+2-2017-digitalt+l%C3%A4rande.pdf.
Tallvid (2015). 1:1 I KLASSRUMMET – analyser av en pedagogisk praktik i förändring. Unpublished PhD tesis, Göteborgs universitet.
Valero, P., & Knijnik, G. (2015). Child through ICT research in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(2), 34–39.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wistedt, I., Brattström, B., & Jacobsson, C. (1992). Att vardagsanknyta matematikundervisningen: Slutrapport från projektet Vardagskunskaper och skolmatematik. Stockholm: Pedagogiska Institutionen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norén, E. (2018). Agency, Materiality, and Mathematics Learning in a Preschool Classroom. In: Gellert, U., Knipping, C., Straehler-Pohl, H. (eds) Inside the Mathematics Class. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79044-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79045-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)