Skip to main content

Agency, Materiality, and Mathematics Learning in a Preschool Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inside the Mathematics Class

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

  • 911 Accesses

Abstract

By taking a socio-political stance towards the positive adoption of iPads to advance mathematical learning, this paper explores mathematical practices in a Swedish preschool class (children aged six to seven) where each young student was provided with a digital tablet. The focus is on how the students’ agency or boundaries emerge in the relational practices between the students and the materials: hands-on-manipulatives as well as digital technology. The paper adopts a socio-material perspective for the analysis of the practices. Both digital technology and the more traditional hands-on-manipulatives are exemplifying materials in the intertwining of human and non-human agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Different authors vary the term to socio-materiality or social materiality. In this chapter, I write sociomateriality except when referring to a certain author. The term relates to social interaction in a technological world (Leonardi et al. 2012).

References

  • Amit, M., & Fried, M. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, A., & Wagner, D. (2016). Language repertoires for mathematical and other discourses. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1166–1172). Tucson, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agélii Genlott, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers & Education, 67, 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matters. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics of the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke Universal.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1989). Manipulatives don’t come with guarantees. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(2), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1971). Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language (Class, code and control) (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1974). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, N. (2011). Processing mathematics through digital technologies: The primary years. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, E. (2017). Karen Barad’s quantum ontology and posthuman ethics: Rethinking the concept of relationality. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 135–151). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, M. J. (1983). Research within reach: Elementary school mathematics and reading. St. Louis: CEMREL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drotner, K. (2009). Children and digital media: Online, on site, on the go. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 360–373). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, A., & Boero, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). What is ethnography? Ethnography, principles in practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hornecker, E., & Burr, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. Proceedings of HCI, April 22–28, 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Accessed 10 Oct 2016. http://www.ehornecker.de/Papers/FrameworkCHI.pdf.

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johri, A. (2011). The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, P., Lingefjärd, T., & Mehanovic, S. (2010). IKT I matematikundervisningen. Datorn i Utbildningen nr 2. Accessed 25 Aug 2016. http://www.diu.se/nr2-10/nr2-10.asp?artikel=s33.

  • Kallinikos, P. M., Leonardi, B. A., & Nardi, J. K. (2012). The challenge of materiality: Origins, scope, and prospects. In P. M. Kallinikos, B. A. Leonardi, & J. K. Nardi (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kjällander, S. (2012). APPKNapp – peka, lek & lär i förskolan. [APPbutton – point, play & learn in preschool]. Report from a researcha project in cooperation between Botkyrka commune and Stockholm University. Accessed 14 Apr 2015. http://appknapp.se/slutrapport/SV_rapport_appknapp_slutversion.pdf.

  • Kjällander, S., & Moinian, F. (2014). Digital tablets and applications in preschool: Preschoolers’ creative transformation of didactic design. Designs for Learning, 7(1), 10–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labinowics, E. (1985). Learning from children: New beginnings for teaching numeral thinking. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (Eds.). (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, T., & Lange, T. (2013). Learners in transition between contexts. In K. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 169–202). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (2013). Tablets in the classroom: Improvisational rhythms and change through bricolage. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013), pp. 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norén, E., & Andersson, A. (2016). Multilingual students’ agency in mathematics classrooms. In A. Halai & P. Clarkson (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Issues for policy, practice and teacher education (pp. 109–124). Sense: Rotterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dagens Nyheter (2012). Surfplattor ersätter skolböcker i Sollentuna. [Surf tablets replace school books in Sollentuna]. Accessed 12 Oct 2015 http://www.dn.se/sthlm/surfplattor-ersatter-skolbocker-i-sollentuna.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A. (2011). “How many sums can I do”? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmér, H., & Ebbelind, A. (2013). What is possible to learn? Using iPads in teaching mathematics in preschool. In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Mathematics learning across the life span (pp. 425–432).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency & science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preciado-Babb, P. (2012). Incorporating the iPad2 in the mathematics classroom: Extending the mind into the collective. iJEP, 2(2), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M., & Lerman, S. (2011). Researching online mathematics education: Opening a space for virtual learner identities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2010). Incarnation: Radicalizing the embodiment of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, M., Smørdal, O., & Østerud, S. (2012). Exploring iPads in practitioners’ repertoires for language learning and literacy practices in kindergarten. Nordic journal of digital literacy, 7(3), 204–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N. (2014). Generations of research on new technologies in mathematics education. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33, 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N. (2016). Mathematics education as a matter of technology. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket (2013). Accessed 20 Feb 2013 http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/in_english/the_swedish_education_system/2.879.

  • Stockholm Municipality (2013, June). Utvärdering av Ipad-satsning i Stockholms stad Juni 2013. Evaluation of Ipad investment in Stockholm city.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suydam, M. N. (1985). Research on instructional materials for mathematics. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenljunga (2017). Digitalt lärande. [Digital learning]. Accessed 11 Sep 2017 http://www.svenljunga.se/download/18.36f5f89a15aa415906db93/14901027 76691/DetGodasteLivet+2-2017-digitalt+l%C3%A4rande.pdf.

  • Tallvid (2015). 1:1 I KLASSRUMMET – analyser av en pedagogisk praktik i förändring. Unpublished PhD tesis, Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero, P., & Knijnik, G. (2015). Child through ICT research in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wistedt, I., Brattström, B., & Jacobsson, C. (1992). Att vardagsanknyta matematikundervisningen: Slutrapport från projektet Vardagskunskaper och skolmatematik. Stockholm: Pedagogiska Institutionen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Norén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Norén, E. (2018). Agency, Materiality, and Mathematics Learning in a Preschool Classroom. In: Gellert, U., Knipping, C., Straehler-Pohl, H. (eds) Inside the Mathematics Class. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79044-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79045-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics