Skip to main content

Ethics Education Needs More than the Four Principles: Bioethics Discourse in a Community of Inquiry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Education in Bioethics

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 10))

  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

This essay reexamines the four-principle approach to biomedical ethics in the context of ethics education in general and in relation to possible ethics discourse within a community of inquiry in particular. A community of inquiry is the setting for learning and education in philosophy for children. This community enables children to acquire critical thinking and other skills as part of democratic education. The use (or misuse) of the four principles approach tends to contribute to a practice that limits critical thinking skills because of the constraints on the conceptual tools that tend to be used. It has also had the effect of promoting conceptual ambiguity by encouraging the use of limited conceptual molds, thus giving rise to the possibility of multiple interpretations among diverse users, especially in the field of global bioethics. While recognizing the continuing appeal of the approach as a conceptual tool for ethical decision-making the essay brings out the limitations that need to be overcome in order to promote the clarity that the four principles approach is meant to possess.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beauchamp, T.L. 2003. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of Biomedical Ethics (1st edition, 1979; 5th edition 2001). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.V.C. 2003. The virtues (and vices) of the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5): 292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubler, N.N. 2011. A ‘principled resolution’: The fulcrum for bioethics mediation. Law and Contemporary Problems 74 (3): 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emran, Ahmadi Nasab. 2015. The four-principle formulation of common morality is at the core of bioethics mediation method. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 18: 371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9612-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R. 1994. The four principles revisited: A reappraisal. In Principles of Health Care Ethics, ed. R. Gillon, 319–333. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be first among equals. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5): 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. 2003. In praise of unprincipled ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxtable, R. 2013. For and against the four principles, of biomedical ethics. Clinical Ethics 8 (2/3): 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. 1974. Harry Stotlemeier’s Discovery. Upper Montclair: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Suki. Upper Montclair: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Thinking in Education. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Montclair State University/Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. 2003. Applying the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5): 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A.M. 1987. What is a community of inquiry? Journal of Moral Education. 16 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724870160104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The community of inquiry: Education for democracy. Thinking 9 (2): 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon, W.C. 1998. Metaphysical Horizons of Philosophy for Children. Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy: Philosophy and Children. Available: http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Chil/ChilTurg.htm. Accessed 15 June 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo D. de Castro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Castro, L.D., Valero, I.M.C. (2018). Ethics Education Needs More than the Four Principles: Bioethics Discourse in a Community of Inquiry. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Global Education in Bioethics. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78984-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics