Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness and the Influence of Persuasive Strategies in E-commerce

  • Ifeoma Adaji
  • Kiemute Oyibo
  • Julita Vassileva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)


We explore the use of persuasion and need for uniqueness in the continuance intention of e-commerce shoppers. In particular, we examine if Cialdini’s six influence strategies have an effect on the three dimensions of need for uniqueness and if need for uniqueness further influences continuance intention of e-commerce shoppers. To achieve this, we carried out a study of 183 e-commerce shoppers. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), we developed a hypothetical path model using the data from the study. Our results show that the three dimensions of need for uniqueness explain about 22% of the variance in continuance intention of e-commerce shoppers. In addition, scarcity had the highest influence on the three dimensions of need for uniqueness. We further carried out a multi group analysis based on gender. Our results suggest that scarcity influences the decision of females to buy products that are not only unique, but also socially acceptable, while commitment influences males to buy unique and socially acceptable products.


Persuasive strategies Need for uniqueness E-commerce 


  1. 1.
    Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: Science and Practice, vol. 4. Pearson Education, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O., Hunter, G.L.: Consumers’ need for uniqueness: scale development and validation. J. Consum. Res. 28(1), 50–66 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fromkin, H.L.: Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 16(3), 521–529 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruvio, A., Shoham, A., Makovec Brenčič, M.: Consumers’ need for uniqueness: short‐form scale development and cross‐cultural validation. Int. Mark. Rev. 25(1), 33–53 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zimmer, M.R., Little, S.K., Griffiths, J.S.: The impact of nostalgia proneness and need for uniqueness on consumer perceptions of historical branding strategies. In: American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, vol. 10, p. 259 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tian, K.T., McKenzie, K.: The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. J. Consum. Psychol. 10(3), 171–193 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hair Jr., J., Hult, T., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu, W.-Y., Lu, H.-Y., Wu, Y.-Y., Fu, C.-S.: The effects of product scarcity and consumers’ need for uniqueness on purchase intention. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 36(3), 263–274 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orji, R., Nacke, L.E., Di Marco, C.: Towards personality-driven persuasive health games and gamified systems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2017, pp. 1015–1027 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adaji, I., Vassileva, J.: Perceived effectiveness, credibility and continuance intention in E-commerce: a study of Amazon. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 293–306. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations