What Makes It Persuasive?

  • Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen
  • Maja Færge Rabjerg
  • Ea Kirstine Bork Hovedskou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)

Abstract

Based on an analysis of two wearable activity trackers, this papers seeks to contribute to the discussion of characteristics of persuasive design, by arguing that although principles commonly applied in persuasive technologies are present, it may not justify that a technology is defined as persuasive. We refer to the rhetorical concept of peithenanke, in order to explain the subtle nuances of different types of behaviour design, and support previously made arguments that transparency and ethics are fundamental qualities of persuasion, which should not be overlooked neither in theory nor in practice.

Keywords

Persuasion Persuasive design Children Ethics Peithenanke 

References

  1. 1.
    Hogan, M.J.: Persuasion in the rhetorical tradition. In: Dillard, J.P., Shen, L. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, pp. 2–20. Beverly Hills, SAGE (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology, Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Understanding persuasive software functionality in practice: a field trial of polar FT60. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, Claremont, California (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasemann, M., Kanstrup, A.M., Ryberg, T.: Making chocolate-covered broccoli: designing a mobile learning game about food for young people with diabetes. In: DIS 2010 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Billig, M.: Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walbank, F.W., et al.: The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fafner, J.: Retorikkens Brændpunkt. Rhetorica Scandinavia, vol. 2 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atkinson, B.M.C.: Captology: a critical review. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Towards an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 43, 51–58 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of Communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meschtscherjakov, A., Trösterer, S., Lupp, A., Tscheligi, M.: Pokémon WALK: persuasive effects of Pokémon go game-design elements. In: de Vries, P.W., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Siemons, L., Beerlage-de Jong, N., van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10171, pp. 241–252. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55134-0_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen
    • 1
  • Maja Færge Rabjerg
    • 1
  • Ea Kirstine Bork Hovedskou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations