Advertisement

Participatory Design of a Persuasive Mobile Application for Helping Entrepreneurs to Recover from Work

  • Markku Kekkonen
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
  • Piiastiina Tikka
  • Janne Jaako
  • Anna-Mari Simunaniemi
  • Matti Muhos
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)

Abstract

Involving end-users in a participatory design process may help researchers and developers to gain better understanding of the end users’ views about the target system. In this study, we utilized participatory design approach with focus group meetings and participatory design workshops to figure out requirements for persuasive features of a mobile application for entrepreneurs to recover from work related strain and stress. In many cases, end-user participation in the design process may lead into building more efficient persuasive technology solutions and at least avoidance of many of the design pitfalls, but setting up meetings and organizing workshops can be time-consuming.

Keywords

Persuasive Systems Design PSD Focus groups Participatory design Inspiration cards Micro-entrepreneurs Recovery from work Mobile app 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank our colleagues at Promo@Work. This study is part of Promo@Work research project, funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland, contract no. 303430 (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health), contract no. 303431 (University of Oulu, OASIS) and contract no. 303434 (University of Oulu, MicroENTRE).

Harri Oinas-Kukkonen wishes to thank the Finnish Cultural Foundation for supporting this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Marshall, A.L., Leslie, E.R., Bauman, A.E., Marcus, B.H., Owen, N.: Print versus website physical activity programs: a randomized trial. Am. J. Prevent. Med. 25(2) (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00111-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook, R.F., Billings, D.W., Hersch, R.K., Back, A.S., Hendrickson, A.: A field test of a web-based workplace health promotion program to improve dietary practices, reduce stress, and increase physical activity: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 9(2) (2007).  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.2.e17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stroulia, E., Fairbairn, S., Bazelli, B., Gibbs, D., Lederer, R., Faulkner, R., Ferguson-Roberts, J., Mullen, B.: Smart-phone application design for lasting behavioral changes. In: Proceedings of 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, pp. 291–296. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/cbms.2013.6627804
  4. 4.
    Garcia-Ceja, E., Osmani, V., Mayora, O.: Automatic stress detection in working environments from smartphones’ accelerometer data: a first step. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 20(4) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2446195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kardous, C.A., Shaw, P.B.: Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135(4) (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4865269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(6), 1223–1235 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 28 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Off. J. Eur. Union 46, 36–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Muller, P., Devnani, S., Julius, J., Gagliardi, D., Marzocchi, C.: Annual Report on European SMEs 2015/2016 - SME Recovery Continues. European Union (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parasuraman, S., Simmers, C.A.: Type of employment, work-family conflict and well-being: a comparative study. J. Org. Behav. 22(5), 551–568 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dijkhuizen, J., van Veldhoven, M., Schalk, R.: Four types of well-being among entrepreneurs and their relationships with business performance. J. Entrep. 25(2), 184–210 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pärnänen, A., Sutela, H.: Itsensätyöllistäjät Suomessa 2013. Tilastokeskus, Helsinki (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundell, S., Visuri, S., Luukkonen, R.: Hyvinvointibarometri 2014 - Suomen Yrittäjät. Euroopan sosiaalirahasto, European Union (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S.: Irtiottoja Työstä: työkuormituksesta palautumisen psykologia. Tampereen yliopistopaino Oy, Tampere (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zijlstra, F.R.H., Sonnentag, S.: After work is done: psychological perspectives on recovery from work. Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 15 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1080/135943205005513855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bennett, A.A., Bakker, A.B., Field, J.G.: Recovery from work-related effort: a meta-analysis. J. Org. Behav. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2217
  18. 18.
    Karppinen, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Alahäivälä, T., Jokelainen, T., Keränen, A.-M., Salonurmi, T., Savolainen, M.: Persuasive user experience in health behavior change support system: a 12-month study for prevention of metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Med. Inform. 96, 51–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis, J.: Generating directions for persuasive technology design with the inspiration card workshop. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 262–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bødker, S., Iversen, O.S.: Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of 2nd Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2002, pp. 11–18. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tremblay, M.C., Hevner, A.R., Berndt, D.J.: Focus groups for artifact refinement and evaluation in design research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 26, 27 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halskov, K., Dalsgård, P.: Inspiration card workshops. In: Proceedings of 6th Conference on Designing Interactive systems, DIS 2006, pp. 2–11. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markku Kekkonen
    • 1
  • Harri Oinas-Kukkonen
    • 1
  • Piiastiina Tikka
    • 1
  • Janne Jaako
    • 1
  • Anna-Mari Simunaniemi
    • 2
  • Matti Muhos
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Oulu Advanced Research on Service and Information SystemsUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Micro-Entrepreneurship Research Group (MicroENTRE), Kerttu Saalasti InstituteUniversity of OuluNivalaFinland

Personalised recommendations