Skip to main content

Designing an EAC Program for the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University: Early Initiatives and Lessons from the Literature

  • Chapter
Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives

Abstract

In Fall 2015 the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University began a systematic expansion of an ethics across the curriculum program as part of its Life Science Ethics Program. This essay presents the initial elements of that program, reviews the literatures on ethics across the curriculum programs and responsible conduct of research education programs, and concludes with lessons from the literature for ethics education program development. While ethics across the curriculum programs, such as ASU’s Life Science Ethics Program, are likely to be eclectic in specific activities and teaching approaches, they can benefit from (a) having a coordinating body, (b) attending to development of ethics and ethics education competencies across faculty in the community, and (c) using assessment to illuminate opportunities for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arizona State University. (2018a) Graduate | school of life sciences. Accessed April 11, 2018.https://sols.asu.edu/degree-programs/graduate.

  • Arizona State University. (2018b). Undergraduate degrees | school of life sciences. Accessed April 11, 2018. https://sols.asu.edu/degree-programs/undergraduate-degrees.

  • Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizona State University. (ND). ASU charter and goals. https://newamericanuniversity.asu.edu/node/25.

  • Arizona State University (2014) Arizona State University achievements 2002–2014. http://president.asu.edu/sites/default/files/ASU_Achievements_Booklet_Final_032615.pdf.

  • Arizona State University (ND) Barrette facts and figures—fall 2016. https://barretthonors.asu.edu/about/facts.

  • Barry, B., & Herkert, J. (2014) Engineering ethics. In Cambridge handbook of engineering education research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauerle, C. M., American Association for the Advancement of Science, National Science Foundation (U.S.), Division of Undergraduate Education, National Science Foundation (U.S.), & Directorate for Biological Sciences (Eds.). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action: Final report of a national conference. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau, M. J., Pimple, K. D., Mustavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., & Smith, D. H. (1995). Moral reasoning in scientific research: Cases for teaching and assessment. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benya, F., Fletcher, C., & Hollander, R. (Eds.) (2013). Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators: Papers presented at and summary from a workshop on December 12, 2012. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulger, R. E., Heitman, E., & Reiser, S. J. (Eds.). (2002). The ethical dimensions of the biological and health sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D., & Bok, S. (Eds.). (1980). Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canary, H., Herkert, J. R., Ellison, K., & Wetmore, J. (2012). Microethics and macroethics in graduate education for scientists and engineers: Developing and assessing instructional models. In American Society for Engineering Education (Ed.), 2012 ASEE annual conference program: final conference program and proceedings, June 10-13, 2012, San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, TX. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canary, H. E., & Herkert, J. R. (2013). Assessing ethics education in programs and centers: Challenges and strategies. In: F. Benya, C. Fletcher, & R. Hollander (Eds.), Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators: Papers and summary from a workshop December 12, 2012 (pp. 38–43). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, D. B., Denecke, D. D., & Council of Graduate Schools in the United States. (2008). Best practices in graduate education for the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Gene drives on the horizon: Advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Graduate Schools. (2012). Research and scholarly integrity in graduate education: A comprehensive approach. Washington DC.: Council of Graduate Schools. http://cgsnet.org/research-and-scholarly-integrity-graduate-education-comprehensive-approach-2.

  • Cruz, J. A., & Frey, W. J. (2003). An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(4), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1993). Ethics across the curriculum: Teaching professional responsibility in technical courses. Teaching Philosophy, 16(3), 205–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1997). Developing and using cases to teach practical ethics. Teaching Philosophy, 20(4), 353–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1999a). Ethics across the curriculum. In Ethics and the university. (pp. 111–142). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1999b). Teaching ethics across the engineering curriculum. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/instructessays/curriculum.aspx.

  • Davis, M. (2016). From practice to research: A plan for cross-course assessment of instruction in professional ethics. Teaching Ethics, 16(2), 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Hildt E, Laas K, Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. (2016). Twenty-five years of ethics across the curriculum: An assessment. Teaching Ethics, 16(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1995). Case studies for teaching research ethics. Professional Ethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(3–4), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (Eds.). (1997). Research ethics: a reader. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, A., & Parker, K. P. (2004). A model for teaching research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(4), 693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1996). Engineering ethics: What? why? how? and when? Journal of Engineering Education-Washington, 85, 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2013). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth–Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R. (2011). The Lincoln teaching fellows program at the ASU Polytechnic Campus. Teaching Ethics, 11(2), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, J. D. (2013). Institutional strategies for effective research ethics education: A report from the council of graduate schools. In: F. Benya, C. Fletcher, & R. Hollander (Eds.), Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators. Papers and summary from a workshop December 12, 2012 (pp. 47–54). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. R. (2001). Using history and sociology to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(4), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litzinger, T., Christman, J., Lau, A., Tuana, N., & Wise, J. (2003). Learning and teaching ethics in engineering: Preparing engineering faculty to teach ethics. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 8.810.1-8.810.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macrina, F. L. (2014). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (4th ed.). Washington DC: ASM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. M., & Schinzinger, R. (2004). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matchett, N. (2008). Ethics across the curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008(142), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. E. (2016). Ethics across the curriculum: Prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7.

  • National Academy of Engineering (Ed.). (2016). Infusing ethics into the development of engineers: Exemplary education activities and programs. Washington DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimple, K. D. (1996). Teaching research ethics. A Workshop at Indiana University. Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (ED), Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED413834.

  • Plemmons, D. K., Brody, S. A., & Kalichman, M. W. (2006). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(3), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, K., Davis, M., Jackson, A. C., & Maciukenas, J. (2009). ‘Ethics in the details’: Communicating engineering ethics via micro-insertion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2012286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • School of Life Science. (2017). Academic program review self-study report. Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, B. R. (2015). Responsible conduct of research (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Wueste, D., & Frugoli, J. (2007). Using “ethics labs” to set a framework for ethical discussion in an undergraduate science course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(5), 332–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. (2000). Society for ethics across the curriculum. http://www.rit.edu/~w-ethics/seac/.

  • Steneck, N. H. (1999). Designing teaching and assessment tools for an integrated engineering ethics curriculum. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE ’99. 29th Annual (Vol. 2, pp. 12D6/11–12D6/17). San Juan, Puerto Rico: Stripes Publishing L.L.C. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1999.841685.

  • Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, P. D., Denecke, D. D., Council of Graduate Schools. (2006) Graduate education for the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, V. (2003). Ethics across the curriculum: Preparing engineering and science faculty to introduce ethics into their teaching. In Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering (pp. 117–124). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Burght, S., & Kalichman, M. (2017). Train the trainers: RCR courses and workshops. 5th World Conference on Research Integrity. Amsterdam, 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaikowski, L., & Garrett, J. (2004). A three-tiered approach to enhance undergraduate education in bioethics. BioScience, 54(10), 942–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin D. Ellison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellison, K.D., Facemire, C., Herkert, J.R. (2018). Designing an EAC Program for the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University: Early Initiatives and Lessons from the Literature. In: Englehardt, E.E., Pritchard, M.S. (eds) Ethics Across the Curriculum—Pedagogical Perspectives. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78939-2_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics