Shear Connection Local Problems in the Seismic Design of Steel-Concrete Composite Decks

  • S. CarbonariEmail author
  • F. Gara
  • A. Dall’Asta
  • L. Dezi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 10)


This paper investigates local problems involved in the transfer mechanisms of inertia forces acting at the level of the concrete slab of typical steel-concrete composite bridge decks. In detail, the behaviour of the shear connection, usually designed with only reference to non-seismic loads at the ultimate limit state, is studied considering shear forces descending from both horizontal and transverse seismic actions. Some results concerning twin-girder steel-concrete composite bridge decks characterised by different static schemes are presented and the distribution of longitudinal and transverse forces acting on the shear connection is discussed. First results demonstrate the significance of properly considering seismic induced forces in the design of the steel-concrete shear connection and support the need of further investigations.


Bridges Local problems Seismic design Shear connection Steel-concrete composite decks 



This research is supported by the DPC/ReLUIS 2015 grant (Line 1: Steel structures and composite steel-concrete structures).


  1. Collings D (2005) Steel-concrete composite bridges. Thomas Telford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Itani AM, Bruneau M, Carden LP, Buckle IG (2004) Seismic behavior of steel girder bridge superstructures. J Bridge Eng 9(3):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. European Committee for Standardization (ECS) (2006) Eurocode 8 - Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 2: Bridges (EN1998-2), Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvi GM (2004) Recent experience and innovative approaches in design and assessment of bridges. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 1–6 August 2004, Paper No. 5009Google Scholar
  5. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, Dall’Asta A (2010) Transverse seismic response of continuous steel-concrete composite bridges exhibiting dual load path. Earthquakes Struct 1(1):21–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astaneh-Asl A, Bolt B, Mcmullin KM, Donikian RR, Modjtahedi D, Cho SW (1994) Seismic performance of steel bridges during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Report No. UCB/CE-Steel-94/01, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawashima K (2010) Seismic damage in the past earthquakes, seismic design of urban infrastructure. Lecture noteGoogle Scholar
  8. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, Dall’Asta A (2012) Influence of model parameter uncertainty on seismic transverse response and vulnerability of steel–concrete composite bridges with dual load path. J Struct Eng 138(3):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zahrai SM, Bruneau M (1998) Impact of diaphragms on seismic response of straight slab-on-girder steel bridges. J Struct Eng 124(8):938–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zahrai SM, Bruneau M (1999a) Ductile end-diaphragms for seismic retrofit of slab-on-girder steel bridges. J Struct Eng 125(1):71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zahrai SM, Bruneau M (1999b) Cyclic testing of ductile end diaphragms for slab-on-girder steel bridges. J Struct Eng 125(9):987–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruneau M, Wilson JW, Tremblay R (1996) Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake. Can J Civ Engrg 23(3):678–713 Ottawa, CanadaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (1990) Lorna Prieta earthquake reconnaissance report. Spectra. supplement to vol. 6, Oakland, CalifGoogle Scholar
  14. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (1994) Northridge Earthquake Jan. 17, 1994, preliminary reconnaissance report. Oakland, CalifGoogle Scholar
  15. Eurocode 2004. CEN4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  16. Straus7 Software. Finite element analysis system. G + D Computing, PadovaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ollgaard J, Slutter R, Fisher J (1971) Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete. AISC Eng J 8:55–64Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Carbonari
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Gara
    • 1
  • A. Dall’Asta
    • 2
  • L. Dezi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Building Engineering, and ArchitectureUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  2. 2.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly

Personalised recommendations