Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Behaviour of a New Pier-to-Deck Connection for Steel Concrete Composite Bridges

  • S. Alessandri
  • R. Giannini
  • F. PaolacciEmail author
  • Nam H. Phan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 10)


Nowadays, short-medium span steel-concrete composite I-girder bridges (SCC) are very popular, owing to their short construction time and reduced costs. Their limited weight makes their use adequate also for seismic areas, even though their seismic behaviour has not been yet adequately investigated. With this aim, within the European project (SEQBRI), the seismic behaviour of new pier-to-deck connections entailing the use of concrete cross-beams (CCB) has been recently studied. This paper shows the results of a comprehensive experimental investigation on this kind of connections conducted with the aim of characterizing the hysteretic behaviour and calibrating a component-based model for seismic analysis. Three different type of connection have been tested: one designed according to the standard DIN-FB104, generally utilized for gravity loads only, and other two, proposed for bridges located in low and medium intensity seismic prone areas. Based on different resistant mechanism, these latter have demonstrated a good behaviour in terms of strength and ductility.


Steel-concrete bridges Concrete cross beam Experimental tests 



This work was carried out with a financial grant from the Research Fund for Coal and Steel of the European Community, within the SEQBRI project: “Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Analysis of Short- Medium Span Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges”, Grant RFSR-CT-2012-00032.


  1. Bursi OS, Ferrario F, Fontanari V (2002) Non-linear Analysis of the Low-cycle Fracture Behaviour of Isolated Tee Stub Connections. Comput Struct 80:2333–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DIN-Fachbericht 104 (2009) Verbundbrücken. Berlin: Beuth VerlagGoogle Scholar
  3. ECCS (1986) Recommended Testing Procedure for Assessing the Behaviour of Structural Elements under Cyclic Loads. Technical Committee 1 – Structural Safety and LoadingGoogle Scholar
  4. EN 1998 (2004) Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistanceGoogle Scholar
  5. Gattesco N, Giuriani E (1996) Experimental study on stud shear connectors subjected to cyclic loading. J Constr Steel Res 38(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanswille G, Porsch M, Ustundag C (2007) Resistance of headed studs subjected to fatigue loading, Part I: Experimental study. J Constr Steel Res 63(4):475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kumar S, Itoh Y, Saizuka K, Usami T (1997) Pseudodynamic testing of scaled models. J Struct Eng 123(4):524–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee PG, Shim CS, Chang SP (2005) Static and fatigue behavior of large stud shear connectors for steel-concrete composite bridges. J Constr Steel Res 61(9):1270–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paolacci F, Giannini R, Malena M, Alessandri S, Paglini A (2014). Toward a performance-based earthquake engineering analysis of short-medium span steel-concrete composite bridges. 2ECEE. 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Istanbul, 25–29 August 2014Google Scholar
  10. SAP2000. Structural Analysis Program ©. 1976–2014 Computer & Structures, IncGoogle Scholar
  11. Shim CS, Lee PG, Yoon TY (2004) Static behavior of large stud shear connectors. Eng Struct 26(18):53–60Google Scholar
  12. Viest IM (1956) Investigation of Stud Shear Connectors for Composite Concrete and Steel T-Beams. J Am Concr Inst 27(8):875–891Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Alessandri
    • 1
  • R. Giannini
    • 2
  • F. Paolacci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nam H. Phan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity Roma TreRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureUniversity Roma TreRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations