Advertisement

Dynamics of Strongly Curved Concrete Beams by Isogeometric Finite Elements

  • Flavio Stochino
  • Antonio Cazzani
  • Gian Felice Giaccu
  • Emilio Turco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 10)

Abstract

The standard finite elements approach for the dynamics of curved beam is usually based on the same energy functional used for straight beam, in other words an energy form that is essentially derived from de Saint–Venant’s theory. In case of strongly curved elements this approximation yields to not negligible errors, in particular for stress assessments. For this reason, in this work a different formulation, based on the Winkler’s simple kinematic assumptions, is adopted. In this way a non diagonal constitutive matrix is obtained and the computational efficiency of NURBS (Non Uniform Rational B–Splines) shape functions is added to an accurate representation of the constitutive relations. In this paper the natural frequencies and mode shapes of plane curved concrete beams are obtained. Computational cost and results accuracy is assessed with respect to closed form solutions and literature results.

Keywords

Strongly curved beams Isogeometric analysis Beam dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support of MIUR, the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, under grant PRIN 2010–2011 (project 2010MBJK5B—Dynamic, Stability and Control of Flexible Structures) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Aristodemo M, Turco E (1994) Boundary element discretization of plane elasticity and plate bending problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 37(6):965–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buffa F, Causin A, Cazzani A, Poppi S, Sanna G, Solci M, Stochino F, Turco E (2015) The sardinia radio telescope: a comparison between close-range photogrammetry and finite element models. Math Mech Solids 22:1005–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286515616227MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilotta A, Formica G, Turco E (2010) Performance of a high-continuity finite element in three-dimensional elasticity. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng 26(9):1155–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cazzani A, Wagner N, Ruge P, Stochino F (2016a) Continuous transition between traveling mass and traveling oscillator using mixed variables. Int J Non-Linear Mech 80:82–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cazzani A, Malagù M, Turco E (2016b) Isogeometric analysis of plane-curved beams. Math Mech Solids 21(5):562–577MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cazzani A, Stochino F, Turco E (2016c) On the whole spectrum of Timoshenko beams Part I: a theoretical revisitation. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik (ZAMP) 67(24):1–30MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Cazzani A, Stochino F, Turco E (2016d) On the whole spectrum of Timoshenko beams Part II: further applications. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik (ZAMP) 67(25):1–21MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Cazzani A, Stochino F, Turco E (2016e) An analytical assessment of finite element and isogeometric analyses of the whole spectrum of Timoshenko beams. J Appl Math Mech Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik (ZAMM) 96(10):1220–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201500280MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cazzani A, Malagù M, Turco E, Stochino F (2016f) Constitutive models for strongly curved beams in the frame of isogeometric analysis. Math Mech Solids 21(2):182–209 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sevim B, Atamturktur S, Altunişik AC, Bayraktar A (2016) Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 14(1):241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kadkhodayan V, Aghajanzadeh M, Mirzabozorg H (2016) Seismic assessment of arch dams using fragility curves. Civ Eng J 1(2):14–20Google Scholar
  13. Li Y, Cai CS, Liu Y, Chen Y, Liu J (2016) Dynamic analysis of a large span specially shaped hybrid girder bridge with concrete-filled steel tube arches. Eng Struct 106:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luu AT, Kim NI, Lee J (2015) Isogeometric vibration analysis of free-form Timoshenko curved beams. Meccanica 50(1):169–187MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stochino F, Cazzani A, Poppi S, Turco E (2018) Sardinia radio telescope finite element model updating by means of photogrammetric measurements. Math Mech Solids 22(4):885–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286515616046CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Stochino F, Carta G (2014) SDOF models for reinforced concrete beams under impulsive loads accounting for strain rate effects. Nucl Eng Des 276:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stochino F (2016) RC beams under blast load: reliability and sensitivity analysis. Eng Fail Anal 66:544–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tüfekçi E, Arpaci A (1998) Exact solution of in-plane vibrations of circular arches with account taken of axial extension, transverse shear and rotatory inertia effects. J Sound Vib 209(5):845–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zong Z, Xia Z, Liu H, Li Y, Huang X (2016) Collapse failure of prestressed concrete continuous rigid-frame bridge under strong earthquake excitation: testing and simulation. J Bridge Eng 21:04016047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Winkler E (1858) Formänderung und festigkeit gekrümmter körper, insbesondere der ringe. Der Civilingenieur 4:232–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flavio Stochino
    • 1
  • Antonio Cazzani
    • 1
  • Gian Felice Giaccu
    • 2
  • Emilio Turco
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Architecture, Design and Urban PlanningUniversity of SassariAlghero, SassariItaly

Personalised recommendations