Skip to main content

The Improv Paradigm: Three Principles that Spur Creativity in the Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity in Theatre

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 2))

Abstract

Improvised scenes work when improvisers listen to their scene partners and agree and add onto each other’s ideas without judgment. These three principles derived from improvisation—listening, agreeing, and not judging—come together to form the improv paradigm, which can be used to modify pedagogy in order to improve student outcomes. Teachers can introduce activities that specifically target how students listen, agree, and judge each other. The principles of the improv paradigm can also be used to reflect on and improve how teachers teach. Colleagues and supervisors can focus on how teachers consciously or unconsciously listen to their students, agree or disagree with their ideas, and judge students’ responses in order to adjust moment-to-moment teacher behavior to create a more creative learning environment. Once improved, these skills lead to more trusting, collaborative, and creative classrooms that foster creative ideation instead of causing students to feel shamed or judged and therefore stop contributing and creating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly?: The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C. (2011). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C. (2016, April 8). Charlotte Danielson on rethinking teacher evaluation. Education Week, 35(28), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMichele, M. (2015). Improv and ink: Increasing individual writing fluency with collaborative improv. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(10). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v16n10/.

  • Drinko, C. (2013). Theatrical improvisation, consciousness, and cognition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1783–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanh, T. N., & Weare, K. (2017). Happy teachers change the world. Berkley: Parallax Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (2011, September). Interkunst workshop. Berlin: English Theatre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (2012). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leep, J. (2008). Theatrical improvisation: Short form, long form, and sketch-based improv. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., Rizik-Baer, D. A., & Braun, A. R. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: An fMRI study of freestyle rap. Scientific Reports, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00834.

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, W. (2015). Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 122–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips Sheesley, A., Pfeffer, M., & Barish, B. (2016). Comedic improv therapy for the treatment of social anxiety disorder. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolin, V. (1983). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hawn Foundation. (2011). The mindUP curriculum: Brain-focused strategies for learning—And living. New York: Scholastic Teaching Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, E. W. (2009). Improvisational theater and psychotherapy: A new model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azusa: Azusa Pacific University.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. C. (2013, November 10). The real reason new college grads can’t get hired. Time Business. Retrieved from http://business.time.com/2013/11/10/the-real-reason-new-college-grads-cant-get-hired/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clayton D. Drinko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Drinko, C.D. (2018). The Improv Paradigm: Three Principles that Spur Creativity in the Classroom. In: Burgoyne, S. (eds) Creativity in Theatre. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78928-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78927-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78928-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics