Abstract
Although scenery is an invaluable asset from any environmental viewpoint, coastal scenery is a lesser-considered aspect of coastal management. Therefore the Coastal Scenic Evaluation System (CSES) technique was developed using fuzzy logic methodology to evaluate the adverse effects of changes to a coastal environment. The CSES can be used not only for landscape preservation and protection, but also as scientific tool for envisaged coastal management and future development based upon plans by an evidence-based approach. This chapter presents a detailed field guide that includes the steps to follow in making a coastal scenery assessment, as well as, key definitions and examples of all parameters required to use the CSES. The Photo-atlas representing all parameters helps in attributing them to the correct grade.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Ergin A, Karaesmen E, Micallef A, Williams AT (2004) A new methodology for evaluating coastal scenery: fuzzy logic systems. Area 36:367–386
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Photo Atlas
Appendix: Photo Atlas
| 1 Cliff height ( H ) |
1: Absent (< 5 m) | |
| 2: 5 m ≤ H < 30 m |
| 3: 30 m ≤ H < 60 m |
| 4: 60 m ≤ H < 90 m |
| 5: H ≥ 90 m |
| 2 Cliff slope |
1: < 45° | |
| 2: 45°–60° |
| 3: 60°–75° |
| 4: 75°–85° |
| 5: Circa vertical |
| 3 Cliff special features |
1: Absent | |
| 2: 1 special feature (e.g. rock fall) |
| 3: 2 special features (e.g. banding and terracing) |
| 4: 3 special features (e.g. banding, jutting cliff, rock fall) |
| 5: Many >3 special features (e.g., irregular profile, notch, banding, folding) |
| 4 Beach type |
1: Absent | |
| 2: Mud |
| 3: Cobble/boulder |
| 4: Pebble/gravel |
| 5: Sand |
| 5 Beach face width ( W ) |
1: Absent | |
| 2: < 5 m or > 100 m |
| 3: 5 m ≤ W < 25 m |
| 4: 25 m ≤ W < 50 m |
| 5: 50 m ≤ W ≤ 100 m |
| 6 Beach face colour |
1: Absent | |
| 2: Dark |
| 3: Dark tan |
| 4: Light tan/bleached |
| 5: White/gold |
| 7 Rocky shore slope |
1: Absent | |
| 2: < 5° |
| 3: 5°–10° |
| 4: 10°–20° |
| 5: > 20° |
| 8 Rocky shore extent |
1: Absent | |
| 2: < 5 m |
| 3: 5 m – 10 m |
| 4: 10 m – 20 m |
| 5: > 20 m |
| 9 Rocky shore roughness |
1: Absent | |
| 2: Distintly jagged |
| 3: Deeply pitted and/or irregular (uneven) |
| 4: Shallow pitted |
| 5: Smooth |
| 10 Dunes |
1: Absent | |
| 2: Remnants |
| 3: Fore-dune |
| 4: Secondary ridge |
| 5: Several |
| 11 Valley |
1: Absent | |
| 2: Dry |
| 3: Stream (< 1 m) |
| 4: Stream (1 m – 4 m) |
| 5: > 4 m |
| 12 Skyline landforms |
1: Not visible | |
| 2: Flat |
| 3: Undulating |
| 4: Highly undulating |
| 5: Mountainous |
| 13 Tide |
1: Macro (> 4 m) | |
| 3: Meso (2 m – 4 m) |
| 5: Micro (< 2 m) |
| 14 Coastal landscape feature |
1: None | |
| 2: 1 Feature (e.g. blowhole) |
| 3: 2 Features (stack and shoals) |
| 4: 3 Features (e.g., caves, pinnacles, emayment) |
| 5: > 3 Features (e.g. irregular headlands, stacks, islands, shoals) |
| 15 Vista |
1: Open on one side | |
| 2: Open on two sides |
| 4: Open on three sides |
| 5: Open on four sides |
| 16 Water colour |
1: Muddy brown/grey | |
| 2: Milky blue/green; opaque |
| 3: Green/grey blue |
| 4: Clear blue/dark blue |
| 5: Very clear turquoise |
| 17 Natural vegetation cover |
1: Bare (< 10% vegetation only) | |
| 2: Scrub/Garigue/grass (marram/gorse/ferns, bramble/meadow, etc.) |
| 3: Wetlands/meadow |
| 4: Coppice, Maquis (mature trees bushes) |
| 5: Varity of mature trees/mature natural cover |
| 18 Vegetation debris |
1: Continuous >50 cm high | |
| 2: Full strand line |
| 3: Single accumulation |
| 4: Few scattered items |
| 5: None |
| 19 Noise disturbance |
1: Intolerable (e.g. loud music from speakers) | |
| 2: Tolerable (e.g. Crowded but no speakers) |
| 4: Little (e.g. not crowded and without speakers; small communication lines) |
| 5: None (e.g. few or scattered people without radios, etc.) |
| 20 Litter |
1: Continuous accumulations | |
| 2: Full strand line |
| 3: Single accumulation |
| 4: Few scattered items |
| 5: Virtually absent |
| 21 Sewage discharge |
1: Sewage evident | |
| 3: Some evidence |
| 5: No evidence of sewage |
| 22 Non built environment |
1: None | |
| 3: Hedgerow/terracing/monoculture |
| 5: Field mixed cultivation +/− trees/natural |
| 23 Built environment |
1: Heavy industry | |
| 2: Heavy tourism and/or urban |
| 3: Light tourism and/or urban and/or sensitive industry |
| 4: Sensitive tourism and/or urban |
| 5: Historic and/or none |
| 24 Access |
1: No buffer zone/heavy traffic | |
| 2: Buffer zone/light traffic |
| 4: Parking lot visible from coastal area |
| 5: Parking lot not visible from coastal area |
| 25 Skyline |
1: Very unattractive | |
| 2: Unattractive |
| 3: Sensitively designed |
| 4: Very Sentitively designed |
| 5: Natural/historic features |
| 26 Utilities |
1: > 3 Utilities (e.g. slipway, handrails, electricity poles, sewage outfall) | |
| 2: 3 Utilities (e.g. groins, electricity poles, railway) |
| 3: 2 Utilities (e.g. groin, lifeguard tower) |
| 4: 1 Utility (e.g. tetrapods) |
| 5: None |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pranzini, E., Williams, A.T., Rangel-Buitrago, N. (2019). Coastal Scenery Assessment: Definitions and Typology. In: Rangel-Buitrago, N. (eds) Coastal Scenery. Coastal Research Library, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78878-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78878-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78877-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78878-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)