Abstract
This chapter discusses long-term changes in economies and future challenges. It introduces two concepts that may help boosting resource efficiency in the future. First, new insights into the saturation effect, i.e. evidence on how UK, USA, Germany and Japan have been consuming key materials since early stages of their industrialisation. The result is striking: the per capita demand for steel and cement starts to saturate at a per capita average income level of US$12,000 GDP/capita in the four industrialized countries, followed by copper saturating at US$20,000 GDP/capita. Comparing those values with China, we see current indications of saturation in the demand for steel and copper. Chinese per capita consumption of cement is extraordinary and dwarfs the levels determined for industrialized countries. It is questionable whether those levels will be maintained for longer. Accordingly, one can expect a saturation level and, perhaps, a peak in the Chinese demand for primary material resources to come soon. Similar patterns may apply to other emerging economies. As resource efficiency efforts come on top of such saturation, the long-run implication is a lower resource demand for the future compared with e.g. recent estimates made by UNEP’s International Resource Panel. The second booster for the resource efficiency debate stems from acknowledging interlinkages, i.e. the nexus between energy, water, food, materials and land. Beyond accounting for interlinkages, the nexus debate adds a security dimension and it helps to address the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Firms and investments create manifold niches for disruptive changes towards sustainability, as this chapter exemplifies via recent modelling results and new models for mining and steel. Our overall outlook is cautiously optimistic as we depict a mission of bottom-up activities driven by various stakeholders and regional interests. Assuming saturation levels soon to reach for future demand of material resources in key economies such as China and observing how ambitious these countries are combatting air pollution and deploying clean technologies, the hubs of resource efficiency may well be shifting Eastwards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali SH, Giurco D, Arndt N et al (2017) Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21359
Allwood JM (2013) Transitions to material efficiency in the UK steel economy. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 371(1986):20110577
Andrews-Speed P et al (2015) Want, waste or war? The global resource nexus and the struggle for land, energy, food, water and minerals. Routledge/Earthscan, London
Auty R (1985) Materials intensity of GDP: research issues on the measurement and explanation of change. Resour Policy 11(4):275–283
Bazilian M et al (2011) Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energ Policy 39(12):7896–7906
Biggs EM et al (2015) Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods. Environ Sci Policy 54:389–397
Bleischwitz R (2001) Rethinking productivity: why has economic analysis focused on labour instead of natural resources? Environ Resour Econ 19(1):23–36
Bleischwitz R, Nechifor V (2016) Saturation and growth over time: when demand for minerals peaks. Centre Cournot PRISME No 34, Paris
Bleischwitz R, Hoff H, Spataru C, van der Voet E, VanDeveer SD (eds) (2017) Routledge handbook of the resource nexus. Routledge, London
Bosello F, Antosiewicz M, Bukowski M et al (2016) Report on economic quantitative ex-ante assessment of proposed policy mixes in the EU. DYNAMIX project deliverable D6.2. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano. http://dynamix-project.eu/quantitative-economic-ex-ante-assessment-dynamix-policy-mixes.html dynamix-project.eu/quantitative-economic-ex-ante-assessment-dynamix-policy-mixes.html
CE and BioIS (2014) Study on modelling of the economic and environmental impacts of raw material consumption. European Commission Technical report 2014-2478
Cleveland CJ, Ruth M (1998) Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use. J Ind Ecol 2(3):15–50. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.3.15
Distelkamp M et al (2016) D3.7c Report about integrated scenario interpretation – Comparison of results. POLFREE: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/polfree/publications
Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (eds) (2007) Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Goldmann Sachs (2016) The low carbon economy. Technology in the driver’s seat. Equity Res November 2016
Green JMH et al (2016) Research priorities for managing the impacts and dependencies of business upon food, energy, water and the environment. Sustain Sci 12:319–331
Hatfield-Dodds S et al (2017) Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies. J Clean Prod 144:403–414
Malenbaum W (1978) World demand for raw materials in 1985 and 2000, National Science Foundation, 75-23687. McGraw Hill, New York
McDowall W et al (2017) Circular economy policies in China and Europe. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597
Nickless E (2016) Resourcing future generations: a global effort to meet the world’s future needs head-on. Eur Geol 42:46–50
Pauliuk S et al (2017) Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life-cycles. Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model. Resour Conserv Recycl 116:84–93
Sieferle R-P (2001) The subterranean forest: energy systems and the industrial revolution. The White Horse Press, Cambridge
UNEP (2017) Resource efficiency: potential and economic implications. A report of the International Resource Panel. Ekins P, Hughes N et al
Winning M, Calzadilla A, Bleischwitz R, Nechifor V (2017) Towards a circular economy: insights based on the development of the global ENGAGE-materials model and evidence for the iron and steel industry. IEEP. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0385-3
Wrigley EA (2013) Energy and the English industrial revolution. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 371(1986):20110568
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bleischwitz, R. (2018). Transformations and Disruptive Changes: Boosting Resource Efficient Economies via Saturation and the Nexus. In: Flachenecker, F., Rentschler, J. (eds) Investing in Resource Efficiency. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78867-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78867-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78866-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78867-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)