Abstract
The visual representation of people with physical disabilities has a history which is fraught. Disabled bodies have been variously portrayed as abnormal or abject, or else simply concealed. This mirrors social representations concerning the sexuality of disabled bodies which dictate that bodies which defy societal standards for normality cannot be sexual. People with physical disabilities are desexualised, a process sustained and maintained by their symbolic representation in the public imagining. Our chapter explores the ways in which photovoice can be used by people with physical disabilities in the global South to challenge dominant representations of their sexuality. Their images offer a valuable challenge to the moral and social agendas underlying societal thinking about and representing of bodies, sexuality and difference particularly relevant to the global South.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2003). Disability. London: Polity.
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Medical education and disability studies. Journal of Medical Humanities, 30(4), 221–235.
Condrau, F. (2007). The patient’s view meets the clinical gaze. Social History of Medicine, 20(3), 525–540.
Darke, P. (2004). The changing face of representations of disability in the media. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barriers—Enabling environments (pp. 100–105). London: Sage.
Delin, A. (2002). Buried in the footnotes: The absence of disabled people in the collective imagery of our past. In R. Sandell (Ed.), Museums, society, inequality (pp. 84–97). London: Routledge.
Dorn, M. L. (1994). Disability as spatial dissidence: A cultural geography of the stigmatized body. Master’s thesis, The Pennsylvania State University.
Foucault, M. (1970). The archaeology of knowledge. Information (International Social Science Council), 9(1), 175–185.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1995). A dialogue: Culture, language, and race. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 377–403.
Garland-Thomson, R. (2009). Staring: How we look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grue, J. (2016). The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique. Disability & Society, 31(6), 838–849.
Hafsteinsson, S. B., & Bredin, M. (Eds.). (2010). Indigenous screen cultures in Canada. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Hubbard, J. (1996). Lives turned upside down: Homeless children in their own words and photographs. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hunt, X., Swartz, L., Carew, M. T., Braathen, S. H., Chiwaula, M., & Rohleder, P. (2018). Dating persons with physical disabilities: The perceptions of South Africans without disabilities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(2), 141–155.
Lacan, J., & Sheridan, A. (1978). Ecrits: A selection. JSTOR.
Lykes, M. B. (1997). Activist participatory research among the Maya of Guatemala: Constructing meanings from situated knowledge. Journal of Social Issues, 53(4), 725–746.
McRuer, R. (2011). Disabling sex: Notes for a rip theory of sexuality. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17(1), 107–117.
Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (2013). Narrative prosthesis. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 222–235). New York and London: Routledge.
Morley, D. (2003). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
Nelson, J. (1996). The invisible cultural group: Images of disability. In P. Lester (Ed.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media (pp. 119–125). Westport, CO: Praeger.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493–508.
Ross, S. D. (2011). Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media. ABC-CLIO.
Shakespeare, T. (1994). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? Disability & Society, 9(3), 283–299.
Wang, C. (2003). Using photovoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 179–196). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behaviour, 24(3), 369–387.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunt, X., Swartz, L., Braathen, S.H., Carew, M., Chiwaula, M., Rohleder, P. (2019). Shooting Back and (re)framing: Challenging Dominant Representations of People with Physical Disabilities in South Africa. In: Chappell, P., de Beer, M. (eds) Diverse Voices of Disabled Sexualities in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78852-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78852-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78851-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78852-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)