Abstract
The need for integrated behavioral health leaders to develop competencies for financial management is growing as healthcare delivery transitions from traditional fee for service to value-based models of reimbursement. This chapter is focused on developing a business case for sustainable integrated behavioral health programs. Key competencies include determining program costs, projecting revenue, completing a pro forma, and calculating return on investment (ROI) for integrated behavioral healthcare delivery. Examples of measurement and evaluation of these competencies are included.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Other models of integrated behavioral healthcare refer to the role as a behavioral health provider (BHP). This is the term used in this chapter except when referring to the PCBH model.
References
Basu, S., Landon, B., William, J., Bitton, A., Song, Z., & Phillips, R. (2017). Behavioral health integration into primary care: A microsimulation of financial implications for practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, published online doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4177-0j.
Beacham, A., Khatri, P., Reimer, D., Sickle, K., Ali, M., Farber, E., et al. (2017). Meeting evolving workforce needs: Preparing psychologists for leadership in the patient-centered medical home. American Psychologist, 72(1), 42–54.
Berwick, D., Nolan, T., & Whittington, J. (2008). The triple aim: Care, health and cost. Health Affairs, 27(3), 759–769. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.759.
Chiles, J. A., Lambert, M. J., & Hatch, L. (2002). Medical costs offset: a review of the impact of psychological interventions on medical utilization over the past three decades. In N. A. Cummings, W. T. O’Donohue, & K. E. Ferguson (Eds.), The impact of medical cost offset on practice and research: making it work for you (pp. 47–56). Reno: Context Press.
Corso, K., Hunter, C., Owen, D., Kallenberg, G., & Manson, L. (2016). Integrating behavioral health into the medical home: A rapid implementation guide. Williamsport, PA: Greenbranch.
Gerrity, M. (2016). Evolving models of behavioral health integration: Evidence update 2010–2015. Rockport, MD: Milbank Memorial Fund.
Hoge, M., Morris, J., Laraia, M., Pomerantz, A., & Farley, T. (2014). Core competencies for integrated behavioral health and primary care. Washington, DC: SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions.
Kathol, R. G., deGruy, F., & Rollman, B. L. (2014). Value-based financially sustainable behavioral health components in patient-centered medical homes. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1619.
Lewis, A. (2012). Why nobody believes the numbers: Distinguishing fact from fiction in population health management. New Jersey: Wiley.
McDaniel, S., Grus, C., Cubic, B., Hunter, C., Kearney, L., Schuman, C., et al. (2014). Competencies for psychology practice in primary care. American Psychologist, 69(4), 409–429.
Miller, B., Gilchrist, E., Ross, K., Wong, S., Blount, A., & Peek, C. (2016). Core competencies for behavioral health providers working in primary care. Prepared from the Colorado Consensus Conference.
Miller, B., Ross, K., Melek, S., Davis, M., & Kathol, R. (2017). Payment reform in the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Enabling and sustaining integrated behavioral health care. American Psychologist, 72(1), 55–68.
Porter, M., & Lee, T. (2016). From volume to value in health care: The work begins. JAMA, 316(1), 1047–1048.
Ratzliff, A., Unutzer, J., Katon, W., & Stephens, K. (2016). Integrated care: Creating effective mental and primary health care teams (p. 2016). Hoboken: Wiley.
Robinson, P., & Reiter, J. (2016). Behavioral consultation and primary care: A guide to integrating services (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Van Leusen, P. (2013). Assessments with rubrics. Arizona State University. Teach Online: Resources for Teaching Online. Accessed 25 July 2016 at https://teachonline.asu.edu/2013/08/assessments-with-rubrics/#more-2246.
Summary
This model for training the value-based business case for integrated behavioral health combines the strengths of the PCBH and COCM within the framework of value-based, population health management approaches proposed by Kathol et al. (2014). The PCBH is necessary for active patient management using PCP-led, team-based care in the PCMH. In addition, the PCBH BHC is ideally suited to provide consultation, training, and education to the PCMH team on all aspects of integrated behavioral care. The CoCM care manager is necessary to deliver the patient outreach and long-term follow-up treatment essential to achieving improved health, decreased utilization, and resultant cost savings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: Degree Program Discussion Board Rubric
Criteria | Unacceptable | Acceptable | Good | Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quality of initial post (2 points) | Post meets one or fewer of the four criteria or did not submit (0 points) | Post meets two of the four criteria (1 point) | Post meets three of the four criteria (1.5 points) | Initial post meets all of the following criteria Is well developed Fully addresses all aspects of the discussion board question Meets criteria for substantive (**salutations and references do not count toward minimum word requirements**) Post is factually correct (2 points) |
References and support (.5 points) | Post incorporates zero course materials or did not submit (0 points) | Post incorporates one piece of information or meets one of the three required criteria (0.1 point) | Post incorporates two pieces of information or meets two of the three required criteria (0.3 point) | Post incorporates three pieces of information from course materials (e.g. assigned readings, lectures, etc.) and meets all of the following criteria: Includes in-text citations Includes reference list At least one reference is from an assigned reading (0.5 point) |
Clarity and mechanics | Post meets two or fewer of the required criteria or did not submit (0 points) | Post meets three of the five required criteria (0.1 point) | Post meets four of the five required criteria (0.3 point) | Post meets all of the following criteria: Reference is in APA style (indentation not required due to formatting limitation of discussion board) In-text citation is in APA style Has no more than two errors in clarity/mechanics and/or grammatical/spelling errors Communicates in a friendly and courteous manner Post is well organized and easy to read (0.5 point) |
Follow-up postings | Post meets two or fewer of the required criteria or post does not add to the discussion or did not submit (0 points) | Response post adds to the discussion and post meets three to four of the nine required criteria (0.5 point) | Response post adds to the discussion and post meets five to six of the nine required criteria (0.75 point) | Response post adds to the discussion through the provision of a new idea or concept based on course content and meets six of the nine following criteria: Is well developed Meets criteria for substantive (**salutations and references do not count toward minimum word requirements**) Post is factually correct Post does not merely restate the student’s initial post Includes in-text citations and/or a reference list Reference list and/or in-text citations are in APA style Post is free of grammatical/spelling errors Communicates in a friendly and courteous manner Post is well organized and easy to read (1 point) |
Appendix B: Assignment Instructions and Grading Rubric for Written Assignment: Integrated Behavioral Health Intervention Utilization, Cost, Cost Savings, and Return on Investment Results and Analysis (25 points)
Assignment #1 Instructions
Complete a proposal for the design, implementation, and evaluation of an integrated behavioral health intervention designed to result in cost savings and a return on investment. The intervention must address at least two conditions: one must be medical (e.g., diabetes, hypertension) and one must be behavioral (e.g., depression, anxiety, substance use disorder). The intervention should be based on the population health management (PHM) model. Examples and instructions for the PHM model are included in the assigned readings. You will write the proposal as an integrated behavioral health provider. The intended audience for this report is the CEO for a Patient-Centered Medical Home and Accountable Care Organization primary care clinic network. The proposal must include each of the following sections:
Program/Intervention Costs
List staffing, administrative support, supplies, physician and nurse time, data entry and analysis, etc. You must use dollar estimates for each cost category and a grand total for program costs.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) Utilization and Cost
List each category of utilization and associated dollar cost (e.g., physician visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions and days, pharmacy, specialist referral visits, labs, and imaging). Include aggregate mean utilization and cost for at least 2 years and ideally 3 years pre-intervention. For each unit of service, assign a specific dollar amount. Compute the total pre-intervention cost based on the mean (average) annual utilization multiplied by the unit cost for each category.
Post-Intervention Utilization and Cost
List each category of utilization and associated dollar cost (e.g., physician visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions and days, pharmacy, specialist referral visits, labs, and imaging). Include aggregate mean utilization and cost for at least 1 year post-intervention. For each unit of service, assign a specific dollar amount. Compute the total post-intervention cost based on the mean (average) annual utilization multiplied by the unit cost for each category.
Return on Investment Calculation
Use the formula listed in the readings to calculate return on investment: total cost savings (pre-intervention costs minus post-intervention costs) divided by the total cost of the intervention.
ROI Analysis
Executive summary: brief summary of entire project, rationale for leadership investment in project, overall benefits, and long-term sustainability of program.
Assignment #1 Grading Rubric (Edited, Selected Sections Only for Illustrative Purposes)
Item | Excellent 2.0 | Fair 1.0 | Unacceptable 0 |
Problem statement | Clear statement of need based on evidence for high costs for the selected conditions and population | Vague or partial statement of need based on evidence for high costs for the selected conditions and population | No statement of need based on evidence for high costs for the selected conditions and population |
Population | All key elements described: age, gender, ethnicity, setting | Partial description of key elements: age, gender, ethnicity, setting | No description of key elements: age, gender, ethnicity, setting |
Patient identification | Clear description of how patients will be identified based on more than one criteria, such as patient self-report measures, claims data, lab, or diagnostic data in the electronic medical record, physician referral | Vague or partial description of how patients will be identified based on more than one criteria, such as patient self-report measures, claims data, lab, or diagnostic data in the electronic medical record, physician referral | No description of how patients will be identified based on more than one criteria, such as patient self-report measures, claims data, lab, or diagnostic data in the electronic medical record, physician referral |
Excellent 5.0 | Fair 4.0 | Poor 3.0 | |
Program costs | Clear description of costs for program including staffing, administrative support, supplies, physician and nurse time, data entry and analysis, etc. Use dollar estimates for each cost category and a grand total for program costs | Vague or partial description of costs for program including staffing, administrative support, supplies, physician and nurse time, data entry and analysis, etc. Incomplete use of dollar estimates for each cost category and a grand total for program costs | Poor description of costs for program including staffing, administrative support, supplies, physician and nurse time, data entry and analysis, etc. No use of dollar estimates for each cost category and a grand total for program costs |
Pre- and post-intervention utilization and cost intervention costs) | Clear, detailed description of each key type of utilization such as physician visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions and days, pharmacy, specialist referral visits, labs, and imaging that you will report based on the mean number of visits per patient for at least 1 year prior to the intervention and 1 year post-intervention. For each unit of service, assign a specific dollar amount, and compute the total cost of pre- and post-intervention based on utilization. Includes a total dollar amount for pre-intervention utilization/costs and post-intervention utilization/costs | Vague or partial description of each key type of utilization such as physician visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions and days, pharmacy, specialist referral visits, labs, and imaging that you will report based on the mean number of visits per patient for at least 1 year prior to the intervention and 1 year post-intervention. Unclear description of how each unit of service is assigned a specific dollar amount and unclear computation of the total cost of pre- and post-intervention based on utilization. Unclear plan to have a total dollar amount for pre-intervention utilization/costs and post-intervention utilization/costs | Poor description of each key type of utilization such as physician visits, emergency department visits, hospital admissions and days, pharmacy, specialist referral visits, labs, and imaging that you will report based on the mean number of visits per patient for at least 1 year prior to the intervention and 1 year post-intervention. Poor description of how each unit of service you will assign a specific dollar amount and compute the total cost of pre- and post-intervention based on utilization. Lacking plan to have a total dollar amount for pre-intervention utilization/costs and post-intervention utilization/costs |
ROI calculation | Clear description of the ROI calculation based on the formula listed in the readings to calculate return on investment: total cost savings (pre-intervention costs minus post-intervention costs) divided by the total cost of the intervention | Vague or partial description of the ROI based on the formula listed in the readings to calculate return on investment: total cost savings (pre-intervention costs minus post-intervention costs) divided by the total cost of the intervention | No description of ROI based on the formula listed in the readings to calculate return on investment: total cost savings (pre-intervention costs minus post-intervention costs) divided by the total cost of the intervention |
Appendix C: Sample Quiz Question
Multiple choice: PCMH and diabetes cost savings
Points:1
Question | In the article by Wang et. al., “Patient-centered medical home impact on health plan members with diabetes,” Table 3, which of the following outcome measures was not associated with a significant reduction in costs between baseline and at least one year 1, 2, or 3 in the study for the PCMH? |
Answer | Total medical care PMPM Inpatient PMPM ED PMPM Pharmacy (Rx) PMPM |
Appendix D: Group Activity: Billing and Reimbursement in Integrated Healthcare (Edited)
Overview
In this assignment, you will research billing codes and reimbursement for integrated healthcare services in a primary care clinic. This group activity is designed to help you prepare for written assignment #1.
Instructions
In this week Chap. 7 in Corso et al. (2016) “Integrating Behavioral Health into the Medical Home,” a strong emphasis is on analyzing reimbursement rates as a component of your business case or integrated behavioral health. In this group assignment, I would like each of you to research the billing codes specific to the institution, payer, and provider license for either (a) your current clinical practice (if you work in a clinical setting) or (b) a primary care Accountable Care Organization (ACO) clinic in your state (for students who do not work in a clinic). Approach this with the assumption that you are the clinic leader interested in developing/enhancing integrated behavioral health in your clinic. You plan to evaluate which reimbursement codes your clinic is eligible for and what types of clinicians are eligible for reimbursement for reimbursement codes that are available in your clinic.
Evaluate each of the specific codes listed below for your clinic scenario. Which codes are eligible for reimbursement? For those codes that your clinic is eligible for, answer these questions: What provider license types? What payers? What reimbursement rates (if available)?
-
Health and Behavior Codes
-
Psychotherapy Codes
-
Screening, Brief Assessment, Referral and Treatment Codes
-
Wellness Codes
-
Screening and Prevention Codes
-
Care Coordination/Chronic Care Management
The presentation should be brief, simple, and delivered as if you were in a team meeting in a clinic setting making your presentation to your integrated behavioral health “team.” You are making a presentation to your “team” based on your initial analysis and expect questions, discussion, and next steps.
Instructions for Discussion Board Post and Substantive Reply
After the meeting is completed, each student should write a summary post on the group discussion board that describes his/her experience in the group. Was the group meeting helpful? Were there challenges? Describe how the group discussion helped to refine your approach to this assignment. Finally, post a brief (one paragraph) summary of your research on reimbursement for services in support of integrated behavioral health in your scenario. What services in support of integrated care are reimbursable in your scenario? Which one’s are not?
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Donnell, R. (2018). The Business Case for Integrated Behavioral Healthcare Delivery. In: Macchi, C., Kessler, R. (eds) Training to Deliver Integrated Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78850-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78850-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78848-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78850-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)