Covering’s Other Hidden Assault

  • Cyril GhoshEmail author


In this chapter, I engage with the concept of gay “covering”—as theorized by Kenji Yoshino. Gay covering refers to actions of gay and lesbian individuals to “disattend,” or tone down, their (despised) sexuality in an effort to fit into and be accepted by the mainstream. In Yoshino’s telling, this is the newest iteration of a set of societal (and even legal) injunctions imposed on gays and lesbians, following a sequence, in the beginning, to convert, then, to pass, and finally, to cover. I argue here that while Yoshino’s analysis offers several critical insights it nonetheless elides any critical engagement with the question of agency on the part of the subject of covering. Consequently, he misunderstands the plural motivations that may lead an individual to cover. Yoshino also misreads some forms of conduct as if they encode acts of covering when in fact the individuals performing those acts are potentially merely “being themselves.” Thus, Yoshino’s critique ends up being just as oppressive as the oppression it is mobilized to dismantle in that it is an injunction to reverse cover. Consequently, it can harm, rather than help, LGBT+ persons and curtail, rather than enhance, their freedoms.


“acting straight” “acting white” Civil rights Covering Stigma 


  1. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2004. “Gender Regulations.” In Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Elizabeth F. 2009. Semi-Citizenship in Democratic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Collier, David, Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. 2006. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (3): 211–246.Google Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299.Google Scholar
  6. Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Franke, Katherine M. 2012. “Dating the State: The Moral Hazards of Winning Gay Rights.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 44 (1): 1–46.Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition: Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Postsocialist’ Age.” New Left Review 1/212 (July–August): 68–93.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.Google Scholar
  11. Gerring, John. 1999. “What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences.” Polity 31 (3): 357–393.Google Scholar
  12. Ghosh, Cyril. 2013. The Politics of the American Dream: Democratic Inclusion in Contemporary American Political Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson, Nia-Malika. 2014. “What President Obama Gets Wrong About ‘Acting White.’” The Washington Post, July 24.
  14. Horowitz, Paul. 2007. “Uncovering Identity.” Michigan Law Review 105 (6): 1283–1300.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, Anthony. 1993. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah.Google Scholar
  16. Lehring, Gary. 2003. Officially Gay: The Political Construction of Sexuality. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Scalia, Antonin. 1993. Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah.Google Scholar
  18. Valdes, Francisco. 1995. “Queers, Sissies, Dykes and Tomboys: Deconstructing the Conflation of Sex, Gender and Sexual Orientation in Euro-American Law and Society.” California Law Review 83 (1): 51–55.Google Scholar
  19. Yoshino, Kenji. 2002. “Covering.” The Yale Law Journal 111 (4): 769–939.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2006. Covering: The Hidden Assault on American Civil Rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wagner CollegeStaten IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations