Advertisement

Radical Theory Creep

  • Cyril Ghosh
Chapter

Abstract

In recent years, many radical/queer LGBT+ rights activists and scholars have identified pinkwashing as the act of characterizing western democracies as havens of individual rights on the grounds that they are progressive on the question of LGBT+ rights. In the process, pinkwashing demonizes as gross human rights abusers those countries—often Muslim countries—that do not have LGBT+ rights protections. There is a lot to be gained from this critique. However, in this chapter, I also suggest that this critique can sometimes slip into what I call Radical Theory Creep. This occurs when what begins as a perfectly pointed and systematic critique of one thing steadily loses its analytical rigor as the argument develops, usually as a result of it attempting to incorporate within itself a range of other strains of radical/queer critique. Consequently, each such discursive formation shores up a series of unsustainable conflations and binaries that, in turn, produce their own assimilationist injunctions.

Keywords

Hillary Clinton Human rights Imperialism Islamophobia Israel Pinkwashing Radical Theory Creep 

References

  1. Agathangelou, Anna, and L.H.M. Ling. 2009. Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Agathangelou, Anna. 2013. “Neoliberal Geopolitical Order and Value: Queerness as a Speculative Economy and Anti-Blackness as Terror.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (4): 453–476.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, Sara. 2011. “Problematic Proximities: Or Why Critiques of Gay Imperialism Matter.” Feminist Legal Studies 19: 119–132.Google Scholar
  4. ARC International. 2015. “SOGI Statements.” ARC International (2015): SOGI Statements. http://arc-international.net/global-advocacy/sogi-statements/.
  5. Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 2013. Postcolonial Studies: The Key Concepts, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  6. Associated Press/L.A. Times. 2017. “Transgender People Are Being Killed at a Record Pace in U.S., Advocacy Groups Say.” L.A. Times, November 17. http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-transgender-homicides-20171117-story.html.
  7. Clinton, Hillary. 2011. “Hillary Clinton on Gay Rights Abroad: Secretary of State Delivers Historic LGBT Speech in Geneva (Video, Full Text),” December 6. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/06/hillary-clinton-gay-rights-speech-geneva_n_1132392.html.
  8. Cushman, John H. 1993. “Mission in Somalia Is to Secure City.” The New York Times, October 10. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/10/world/mission-in-somalia-is-to-secure-city.html?pagewanted=print&src=pm.
  9. Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Duggan, Lisa. 2002. “The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism.” In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, edited by Russ Castronovo and Dana Nelson, 175–194. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Estrin, Daniel. 2018. “Trump Threatens to Withhold Aid to Palestinians.” National Public Radio, January 3.Google Scholar
  13. Franck, Thomas. 2001. “Are Human Rights Universal?” Foreign Affairs, January/February. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/afghanistan/2001-01-01/are-human-rights-universal.
  14. Franke, Katherine. 2012a. “Dating the State: The Moral Hazards of Winning Gay Rights.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 44 (1): 1–46.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2012b. “The Greater Context of the Pinkwashing Debate.” Tikkun, July 3. http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/the-greater-context-of-the-pinkwashing-debate.
  16. Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition: Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Postsocialist’ Age.” New Left Review 1/212 (July–August): 68–93.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Ghosh, Cyril. 2016. “Queer International Relations (1v): Queer as Method.” The Disorder of Things (Blog), November 24. https://thedisorderofthings.com/2016/11/24/queer-international-relations-iv-queer-as-method/.
  19. Gross, Aeyal. 2010. “Israeli GLBT Politics Between Queerness and Homonationalism.” Bully Bloggers, July 3. https://bullybloggers.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/israeli-glbt-politics-between-queerness-and-homonationalism/.
  20. Healy, Kieran. 2017. “Fuck Nuance.” Sociological Theory 35 (2): 118–127.Google Scholar
  21. Lehring, Gary. 2003. Officially Gay: The Political Construction of Sexuality. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mill, John Stuart. 1991. On Liberty and the Subjection of Women, edited by John Gray. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Morris, Wendy L., Bella M. DePaulo, Janina Hertel, and Lindsay C. Taylor. 2008. “Singlism-Another Problem That Has No Name: Prejudice, Stereotypes and Discrimination Against Singles.” In The Psychology of Modern Prejudice, edited by Melanie A. Morrison and Todd G. Morrison, 165–194. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Najjar, Farah. 2017. “Why US Aid to Egypt Is Never Under Threat.” Al Jazeera, October 3. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/10/aid-egypt-threat-171002093316209.html.
  25. Nunez, Christina. 2016. “Map Shows Where Being LGBT Can Be Punishable by Law.” National Geographic, June 16. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/06/lgbt-laws-gay-rights-world-map.
  26. O’Connor, Sandra Day. 2003. Lawrence v. Texas.Google Scholar
  27. Okin, Susan Moller. 1998. “Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions.” Ethics 108 (4), 661–684. Google Scholar
  28. “Panel Discussion: The 2016 Election: What Happened and Why?” 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9wAFScc2ww.
  29. Puar, Jasbir. 2006. “Mapping US Homonormativities: Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography” 13 (1): 67–88.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2010. “To Be Gay and Racist Is No Anomaly.” Guardian, June 2. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jun/02/gay-lesbian-islamophobia.
  32. ———. 2012. “The Golden Handcuffs of Gay Rights: How Pinkwashing Distorts Both LGBTIQ and Anti-Occupation Activism.” The Feminist Wire, January 30. http://www.thefeministwire.com/2012/01/the-golden-handcuffs-of-gay-rights-how-pinkwashing-distorts-both-lgbtiq-and-anti-occupation-activism/.
  33. ———. 2013. “Rethinking Homonationalism.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45: 336–339.Google Scholar
  34. Puar, Jasbir, and Maya Mikdashi. 2012a. “Pinkwatching and Pinkwashing: Interpenetration and Its Discontents.” Jadaliyya, August 9. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/6774/pinkwatching-and-pinkwashing_interpenetration-and.
  35. ———. 2012b. “On Positionality and Not Naming Names: A Rejoinder to the Response by Maikey and Schotten,” October 10. http://Www.Jadaliyya.Com/Pages/Index/7792/On-Positionality-and-Not-Naming-Names-A-Rejoinder-to-the-Response-by-Maikey-and-Schotten.
  36. Schotten, Heike, and Haneen Maikey. 2012. “Queers Resisting Zionism: On Authority and Accountability Beyond Homonationalism.” Jadaliyya, October 10. http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/27175/Queers-Resisting-Zionism-On-Authority-and-Accountability-Beyond-Homonationalism.
  37. Schulman, Sarah. 2011. “Israel and ‘Pinkwashing.’” The New York Times, November 22. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/opinion/pinkwashing-and-israels-use-of-gays-as-a-messaging-tool.html.
  38. Shapiro, Ian. 2002. “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What’s Wrong with Political Science and What to Do about It.” Political Theory 30 (4): 596–619.Google Scholar
  39. Sharpe, Jenny. 1993. “The Unspeakable Limits of Civility: A Passage to India.” In Allegories of Empire: The Figure of Woman in the Colonial Text, edited by Jenny Sharpe. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Spade, Dean. 2013. “Under the Cover of Gay Rights.” NYU Review of Law and Social Change 37: 79–100.Google Scholar
  41. Surasky, Cecilie. 2009. “Naomi Klein Shows You Can Boycott Israel Without Cutting Off Dialogue Over Palestine.” AlterNet, August 31. https://www.alternet.org/story/142341/naomi_klein_shows_you_can_boycott_israel_without_cutting_off_dialogue_over_palestine.
  42. Tharoor, Shashi. 1999. “Are Human Rights Universal?” World Policy Journal 16 (4): 1–6. http://www.worldpolicy.org/tharoor.html.
  43. Tribe, Laurence. 2015. “Equal Dignity: Speaking Its Name.” Harvard Law Review 129: 16–32.Google Scholar
  44. UNHCR. n.d. “Donors.” http://www.unhcr.org/en-us/donors.html.
  45. UNRWA. n.d. “2016 Pledges to UNRWA’s Programmes (Cash and In-Kind)—Overall Donor Ranking as 31 December 2016.” https://www.unrwa.org/sites/default/files/donor_ranking_with_un_agencies_overall.pdf.
  46. ———. n.d. “In Figures: As of 30 December 2010.” https://www.unrwa.org/userfiles/2011080123958.pdf.
  47. ———. n.d. “The United Nations and Palestinian Refugees.” https://www.unrwa.org/userfiles/2010011791015.pdf.
  48. Warner, Michael. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life, 2nd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Weber, Cynthia. 2016. Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Yoshino, Kenji. 2015. “The Supreme Court, 2014 Term–Comment: A New Birth of Freedom?” Harvard Law Review 129: 77–85.Google Scholar
  51. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zivi, Karen. 2014. “Performing the Nation: Contesting Same-Sex Marriage Rights in the United States.” Journal of Human Rights 13 (September): 290–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wagner CollegeStaten IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations