Skip to main content

Transcending the Growth Hegemony

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-growth Politics
  • 477 Accesses

Abstract

Despite its mounting contradictions, it is doubtful that the growth hegemony can be overcome by simply drawing attention to is abundant shortcomings. Nor is it likely that engaging in a direct discursive confrontation with growth discourse will prompt the emergence of a plausible post-growth alternative. This is because the growth hegemony is so deeply ingrained in existing understandings and practices that any overt strategy to challenge it is unlikely to be politically feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Glasson (2015) cites the economic reforms of the Deng Xiaoping era in China as an example of subversive rearticulation. These measures saw private property and the market effectively brought into the centre of the Chinese state-society nexus without directly discursively challenging communism . This was achieved by using the pivot discourse of ‘modernisation,’ which is compatible with both communism and capitalism and was articulated in binary opposition to ‘feudalism.’ The upshot was that Deng was able to shift the discursive conflict away from the binary communism-capitalism and toward that of modernisation-feudalism, whilst creating a new form of ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’ that is open to markets, private property and the like. Other documented historical examples of subversive rearticulation include the shift from conceptions of ‘black’ in Jamaica from signifying dispossessed, uncivilised and incompetent, to signifying soul brother, beautiful and solidarity (Hall 1985); and the legitimisation of the pursuit of self-interest from the eighteenth century (Hirschman 1977), which was explored at length in Chap. 3. Glasson (2015) also outlines a set of speculative processes of subversive rearticulation from pro-growth to no-growth; industrialism to precautionary development; consumerism to green citizenship; and national to planetary consciousness, as components of a wider shift from capitalist modernity to ecologism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ferguson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ferguson, P. (2018). Transcending the Growth Hegemony. In: Post-growth Politics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78799-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78797-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78799-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics