A Serious Game for Eliciting Tacit Strategies for Dynamic Table Assignment in a Restaurant

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10711)

Abstract

This paper deals with the table assignment problem in a restaurant, where groups of customers arrive without reservations. The problem is basically a combinatorial optimization problem of finding a desirable match between the groups of customers and the possible sets of combinable tables, but has dynamic as well as subjective aspects. This makes full automation of the task unsuitable and hence it is usually carried out by an individual based on informal and unspecified strategies. This paper proposes a serious game approach for eliciting effective tacit strategies for handling the dynamic table assignment task in a restaurant. The developed game is a single player game, where the player carries out the table assignment task in a virtual restaurant. In the game, customers randomly arrive at the restaurant in groups of different sizes and wait in a room to be seated. The player can at any time assign a set of tables in the restaurant dining room to any of the waiting customer groups, if all the tables to be assigned are vacant and combinable. However, if dissatisfaction due to waiting reaches a pre-specified limit, the customer group will leave the waiting room without having a meal in the restaurant. A prototype of the game is developed and laboratory experiments are conducted using it. As a result, it is confirmed that the score of the proposed game depends on the player’s experience in performing the table assignment task in a real restaurant. Hence, the proposed game and the actual table assignment task have at least some characteristics in common. Further, the players, on average, can improve their game scores through applying their own strategies, and the strategies can be characterized through the data obtained from the game.

Keywords

Serious game Restaurants Table assignment Knowledge management Service science 

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor, S.: Waiting for service: the relationship between delays and evaluations of service. J. Mark. 58, 56–69 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fung, K.K.: It is not how long it is, but how you make it long-waiting lines in a multi-step service process. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 17(4), 333–340 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang, J., Lambert, C.U.: The interaction of major resources and their influence on waiting times in a multi-stage restaurant. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 27, 541–551 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hwang, J., Lambert, C.U.: The use of acceptable customer waiting times for capacity management in a multistage restaurant. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 33(4), 547–561 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson, G.M.: Optimizing a restaurant’s seating capacity: use dedicated or combinable tables? Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q. 43, 48–57 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson, G.M.: Optimizing a restaurant-table configurations: specifying combinable tables. Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q. 44, 53–60 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimes, S.E., Thompson, G.M.: Restaurant revenue management at Chevys: determining the best table mix. Decis. Sci. 35(3), 371–392 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimes, S.E., Thompson, G.M.: An evaluation of heuristic methods for determining the best table mix in full-service restaurants. J. Oper. Manag. 23, 599–617 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertsimas, D., Shioda, R.: Restaurant revenue management. Oper. Res. 51(3), 472–486 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guerriero, F., Miglionico, G., Olivito, F.: Strategic and operational decisions in restaurant revenue management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 237, 1119–1132 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang, J.: Restaurant table management to reduce customer waiting times. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 11(4), 334–351 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Spek, E.D., van Oostendorp, H., Meyer, J.C.: Introducing surprising events can stimulate deep learning in a serious game. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 44, 156–169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunbar, N.E., Miller, C.H., Adame, B.J., Elizondo, J., Wilson, S.N., Lane, B.L., Kauffman, A.A., Bessarabova, E., Jensen, M.L., Straub, S.K., Lee, Y., Burgoon, J.K., Valacich, J.J., Jenkins, J., Zhang, J.: Implicit and explicit training in the mitigation of cognitive bias through the use of a serious game. Comput. Hum. Behav. 37, 307–318 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graafland, M., Vollebergh, M.F., Lagarde, S.M., van Haperen, M., Bemelman, W.A., Schijven, M.P.: A serious game can be a valid method to train clinical decision-making in surgery. World J. Surg. 38, 3056–3062 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohan, D., Angus, D.C., Ricketts, D., Farris, C., Fischhoff, B., Rosengart, M.R., Yealy, D.M., Barnato, A.E.: Assessing the validity of using serious game technology to analyze physician decision making. PLoS ONE 9, 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aoyama Gakuin UniversitySagamiharaJapan

Personalised recommendations