Challenges and Solutions for Integrating Simulation into a Transportation Device

  • Chris Bosomworth
  • Maksym Spiryagin
  • Colin Cole
  • Sanath Alahakoon
  • Mark Hayman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10711)

Abstract

The transportation area has seen an influx of condition monitoring devices in the last 5 years. A condition monitoring device typically has one or more sensors that it uses to measure the state of a component, analyze the measurement and provide a notification if the measurement is outside its normal operating tolerance. However, what happens if the component can’t be readily measured directly, like rolling contact, or when the device is operating in extreme environmental conditions? It can’t just be ignored. This is where simulation has a significant role to play. This paper explores the challenges in integrating a multi-body simulator into an on-board field device installed on a self-powered railway passenger vehicle. The device uses local sensors such as GPS to provide input to a simulator that calculates wheel-rail contact and L/V ratio. The L/V ratio is used as a derailment risk indictor in the rail sector. Wheel-rail contact is a good example of an area that can’t be directly measured, especially in the context of a tractive vehicle. The paper will also describe the use of simulation to verify and validate the device before installation in the field. The study findings show that, while on the cutting edge of available industrial computer technology, it is possible to integrate a multi-body simulator into a device suitable for installation in a powered vehicle. From the test perspective, it was found that simulation is useful as a tool for enabling realistic hardware integration testing before a device is installed into the field.

Keywords

Multi-body Simulator GPS Condition monitoring Wheel-rail contact 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Centre for Railway Engineering, Central Queensland University. The authors also acknowledge AB DEsolver for use of the GENSYS software in vehicle dynamics simulation for this study.

Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com are licensed by Creative Commons BY 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

References

  1. 1.
    Knorr-Bremse: COMORAN: Condition Monitoring for Railway Applications (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ngigi, R.W., Pislaru, C., Ball, A., Gu, F.: Modern techniques for condition monitoring of railway vehicle dynamics. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 364(1), 1–12 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ward, C., Goodall, R.M., Dixon, R., Charles, G.: Condition monitoring of rail vehicle bogies. In: UKACC International Conference on Control, Coventry, UK (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraser, C.S., Judd, A.M., Leahy, F.J.: The simplicity and complexity of straights and curves. In: The 5th International Symposium on Mobile Mapping Technology, Padua, Italy (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durazo-Cardenas, I., Starr, A., Tsourdos, A., Bevilacqua, M., Morineau, J.: Precise vehicle location as a fundamental parameter for intelligent self-aware rail-track maintenance systems. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Through-Life Engineering Services, pp. 220–223 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xia, F., Cole, C., Wolfs, P.: Grey box-based inverse wagon model to predict wheel-rail contact forces from measured wagon body responses. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 46(Suppl), 469–479 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun, Y., Cole, C., Spiryagin, M.: Monitoring vertical wheel-rail contact forces based on freight wagon inverse modelling. Adv. Mech. Eng. 7, 1–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spiryagin, M., Sun, Y.Q., Cole, C., McSweeney, T., Simson, S., Persson, I.: Development of a real-time bogie test rig model based on railway specialised multibody software. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 51, 236–250 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spiryagin, M., Ahmad, S.S.N., Cole, C., Sun, Y.Q., McSweeney, T.: Wagon multibody model and its real-time application. In: Flores, P., Viadero, F. (eds.) New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 24. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09411-3_56Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gensys.1506 Reference Manual: User’s Manual for Program CALC. http://www.gensys.se
  11. 11.
    Spiryagin, M., Cole, C., Sun, Y.Q., McClanachan, M., Spiryagin, V., McSweeney, T.: Design and Simulation of Rail Vehicles. Ground Vehicle Engineering Series. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard, Table 3.4-1 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Global Positioning System Precise Positioning Service Performance Standard, Table 3.4-1 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    AS7509.3, Railway Rollingstock – Dynamic Behaviour – Part 3 – Passenger. 6.5.3 1 (b) (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ernest, P., Mazl, R., Preucil, L.: Train locator using inertial sensors and odometer. In: 2004 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Parma, Italy, pp. 860–865 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu, C., Chen, W., Chen, Y., Liu, D.: Adaptive Kalman filtering for vehicle navigation. J. Glob. Position. Syst. 2(1), 42–47 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xia, F., Cole, C., Wolfs, P.: An inverse railway wagon model and its applications. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 45, 583–605 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ward, C.P., Goodall, R.M., Dixon, R.: Creep force estimation at the wheel-rail interface. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, Manchester, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hussain I., Mei, T.X.: Identification of the wheel-rail contact condition for traction and braking control. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks, Manchester, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrov, V., Berg, M., Persson, I.: Estimation of wheel-rail friction for vehicle certification. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 52, 1099–1114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spiryagin, M., Cole, C., Sun, Y.: Adhesion estimation and its implementation for traction control of locomotives. Int. J. Rail Transp. 1, 187–204 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Bosomworth
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maksym Spiryagin
    • 1
  • Colin Cole
    • 1
  • Sanath Alahakoon
    • 1
  • Mark Hayman
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Railway EngineeringCentral Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  2. 2.Insyte Solutions Pty LtdEmu ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations