Skip to main content

Law and Indirect Reports: Citation and Precedent

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology ((PEPRPHPS,volume 19))

  • 366 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter Alessandro Capone’s claim as the intimate relationship between legal reasoning and indirect reports is investigated through looking at legal citation practices, use of case law, and statutory and constitutional interpretation. Capone’s thought is informed in the chapter through a reference to the work of Ronald Dworkin and Edward H. Levi. The conclusion of the chapter is that Capone is correct that use of indirect reporting in law is ubiquitous and therefore warrants careful study. Further, and opposite of Dworkin’s hope for a univocal use of indirect reports, Levi’s analysis emphasizes the bottom-up, conversational and polyvocal aspects of legal reasoning as is noted by Capone. This in turn requires eliminating the hope for finding or imposing a determinate and univocal meaning on legal citation, case law, and statutory and constitutional interpretation. Instead, continuing dialogue is required. Indeed, legal process should try to include as many voices in the construction of meaning as possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, Keith. (2016). The Reporting of Slurs. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capone, A. (2010). On the social practice of indirect reports (further advances in the theory of pragmemes). Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 377-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capone, A. (2015). What can pragmatics learn from the law? (On Recanati’s cases of modulation, indirect reporting, and cancellability of explicatures). In Capone, A., and J. L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capone, A. (2016). On the (complicated) relationship between direct and indirect reports. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds. (2016). Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds. (2016). Introduction. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, (Eds.),Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentschikoff, Soia, and Irwin P. Stotzky. (1981). The Theory and Craft of American Law – Elements New York: Matthew Bender.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. (1978). Taking Rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Jerome. (1963). Law and the modern mind. Garden City: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Orin S. (2012). A theory of law. Green Bag 16: 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Edward H. (1949). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macagno. Fabrizio. (2016). Reporting and interpreting intentions in defamation law. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, Meredith, and Janet Holmes. Indirect reports and workplace norms. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. (2013). Reflections on judging. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, Eric. The question of reported speech: identifying an occupational hazard. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Jack. (2016). The academic practice of citation. In Capone, A., Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo, Eds.,Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian E. Butler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Butler, B.E. (2019). Law and Indirect Reports: Citation and Precedent. In: Capone, A., García-Carpintero, M., Falzone, A. (eds) Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78771-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78771-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78770-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78771-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics