Evolution of Hashtags on Twitter: A Case Study from Events Groups

  • Layal Abu Daher
  • Rached Zantout
  • Islam Elkabani
  • Khaled Almustafa
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 753)


Twitter is a micro-blogging interactive platform that captured fame due to its simple features that allowed the communication between users. As the interactive communication grew bigger and faster, a feature called Hashtags became very known, famous and recognized by most of users as it acquainted the themes behind the posted tweets. This study focuses on the factors causing people to participate on some trendy hashtags on Twitter online social network. Consequently, these factors affect the evolution of such trendy hashtags over time. In order to study this evolution, a dataset reflecting real tweets from common events occurring between December 2015 and January 2016 were crawled. The reciprocal effect of users’ topological features and activity levels has been studied. Two Influence Measures and one Topological Measure have been introduced in this work. Moreover, other measures available in the literature such as Activity Measures and Centrality Measures have been used. These measures, along with the three newly introduced measures contributed in the determination of the measures that might be influential for a user to attract other users to a certain hashtag. In this work, the focus is on the centrality levels in addition to the activity levels of users participating on the hashtags under study and the effect of those levels on the activity or the membership of other users on same hashtags.


Evolution Hashtags Influence 


  1. 1.
    Tufekci, Z.: Big questions for social media big data: representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, C., Kwak, H., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erlandsson, F., Borg, A., Johnson, H., Bródka, P.: Predicting user participation in social media. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference and School on Advances in Network Science, NetSci-X 2016, Wroclaw, Poland (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Efstathiades, H., Antoniades, D., Pallis, G.: Online social network evolution: revisiting the Twitter graph. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington, DC (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: What’s in a hashtag? Content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2012, Seattle, Washington, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2006, Philadelphia, PA, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saha, B., Getoor, L.: Group proximity measure for recommending groups in online social networks. In: The 2nd SNA-KDD Workshop, SNA-KDD 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patil, A., Liu, J., Gao, J.: Predicting group stability in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bródka, P., Kazienko, P., Kołoszczyk, B.: Predicting group evolution in the social network. In: International Conference on Social Informatics, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bródka, P., Saganowski, S., Kazienko, P.: GED: the method for group evolution discovery in social networks. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(1), 1–14 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarr, I., Missaoui, R., Lalande, R.: Group disappearance in social networks with communities. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 3(3), 651–665 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saganowski, S., Gliwa, B., Bródka, P., Zygmunt, A., Kazienko, P., Koźlak, J.: Predicting community evolution in social networks. Entropy 17(5), 3053–3096 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jamali, S., Rangwala, H.: Digging digg: comment mining, popularity prediction, and social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining, Washington, DC, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hakim, M.A.N., Khodra, M.L.: Predicting information cascade on Twitter using support vector regression. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICODSE), Hyderabad, India (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan, E., Ding, Y.: Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(1), 2107–2118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hawksey, M.: The musing of Martin Hawksey (EdTech Explorer), WordPress and Stargazer (2011). Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  19. 19.
    Hashtagify: Find, Analyse, Amplify, CyBranding Ltd. (2011). Accessed 1 Mar 2015
  20. 20.
    Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating network. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2009, San Jose, California, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niwattanakul, S., Singthongchai, J., Naenudorn, E., Wanapu, S.: Using of Jaccard coefficient for keywords similarity. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Riquelme, F., González-Cantergiani, P.: Measuring user influence on Twitter: a survey. Inf. Process. Manage. 52(5), 949–975 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pal, A., Counts, S.: Identifying topical authorities in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2011, Hong Kong, China (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Layal Abu Daher
    • 1
  • Rached Zantout
    • 2
  • Islam Elkabani
    • 1
  • Khaled Almustafa
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of ScienceBeirut Arab UniversityBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentRafik Hariri UniversityMechrefLebanon
  3. 3.College of EngineeringPrince Sultan UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations