Abstract
Modern biologists and anthropologists invented ideas of scientific race as a universal system of human typing that began with geography and description but by the nineteenth century relied on essences and assessment. When racial categories were seen to be arbitrary and culture viewed as the result of history, ideas of populations were substituted for race. But populations are more numerous than races and can only work as races if social races are assumed to be real and used to identify populations. Also, there are more differences within populations of physical racial traits, than between populations. By the twenty-first century, the idea of race was abandoned in biological science, although in the “race debates” some philosophers, try to retain it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreasen, Robin O. A New Perspective on the Race Debate. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, no. 2, 1998, pp. 199–225.
Boas, Franz. “The Mind of Primitive Man.” Science, New Series, vol. 13, no. 321, Feb. 22, 1911, pp. 281–89.
Brues, Alice Mossie. People and Races. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1977.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi, Paolo Menozzi, and Alberto Piazza. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi. Genes, People, and Languages. Translated by Mark Seielstad. New York: Northpoint Press, 2000.
Cuvier, George. The Animal Kingdom: Arranged in Conformity with Its Organization, edited by H. Murtrie. New York: G&C&H. Carvill, 1831. https://archive.org/details/animalkingdomar03graygoog.
Darwin, Charles, and Alfred Wallace. “On the Tendency of Species to Form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection.” Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, vol. 3, no. 9, 1858, pp. 45–62. Version of Record Online: Apr. 13, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1858.tb02500.x/abstract.
Darwin, Charles. “On the Races of Man.” The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1889, Chap. 7. https://genius.com/Charles-darwin-the-descent-of-man-chapter-7-on-the-races-of-man-annotated.
Fodor, J. A. “Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis).” Synthese, vol. 28, no. 2, Oct. 1974, pp. 97–115.
Foeman, Anita. “DNA Tests, and Sometimes Surprising Results.” The New York Times, Apr. 20, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/23/us/dna-ancestry-race-identity.html?_r=0.
Garn, S. M. Human Races. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas, 1965.
Gillham, Nicholas W. “Sir Francis Galton and the Birth of Eugenics.” Annual Review of Genetics, vol. 35, no. 1, 2001, pp. 83–101.
Goodstein, David. “How Science Works.” Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011, 3rd ed., Chap. 4, pp. 37–54.
Gould, Stephen Jay. “The Geometer of Race.” Discover, vol. 15, no. 11, 1994, pp. 65–9.
Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. London and New York: Norton, 1996.
Hardimon, Michael O. “Minimalist Biological Race.” Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 150–59.
Heirneaux, Jean. In UNESCO, “Four Statements on the Race Question,” 1969, pp. 8–16. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001229/122962eo.pdf.
Krimsky, Sheldon, and Kathleen Sloan, editors. Race and the Genetic Revolution: Science, Myth, and Culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2011.
Lewontin, Richard. “The Apportionment of Human Diversity.” Evolutionary Biology, vol. 6, 1972, pp. 381–98. Marine Library/Stacks. http://www.philbio.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Lewontin-The-Apportionment-of-Human-Diversity.pdf.
Montague, Ashley. Race: Man’s Most Dangerous Myth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1942. https://archive.org/stream/mansmostdangerou032948mbp/mansmostdangerou032948mbp_djvu.txt. Consulted June 6, 2017.
Montague, Ashley. The Idea of Race. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965.
Müller-Wille, Staffan. “Claude Lévi-Strauss on Race, History, and Genetics.” BioSocieties, vol. 5, 2010, pp. 330–47.
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. 2017. http://www.mcz.harvard.edu/about/history.html.
Nelson, William Max. “Making Men: Enlightenment Ideas of Racial Engineering.” American Historical Review, vol. 115, no. 5, 2010, pp. 1364–94.
Population Estimates Bureau. “Race.” United States Census, 2017. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/meta/long_RHI225215.htm.
Radnitzky, Gerard, and Gunnar Andersson, editors. Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1978.
Relethford, John H., The Human Species: An Introduction to Biological Anthropology. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1997.
Relethford, John H. “Biological Anthropology, Population Genetics, and Race.” The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race, edited by Naomi Zack. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 160–69.
Richter, Melvin.“The Study of Man: A Debate on Race.” Commentary, Feb. 1, 1958. https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-study-of-man-a-debate-on-race/.
Rosenberg, Noah A., Jonathan K. Pritchard, James L. Weber, Howard M. Cann, Kenneth K. Kidd, Lev A. Zhivotovsky, and Marcus W. Feldman. “Genetic Structure of Human Populations.” Science, vol. 298, no. 5602, Dec. 20, 2002, pp. 2381–85. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/298/5602/2381/tab-pdf.
Rutledge, M. Dennis. “Myths and Realities: African Americans and the Measurement of Human Abilities.” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 64, no. 3, 1995, pp. 243–52.
Sapp, Jan. “Race Finished,” Jan Bookshelf. American Scientist. Mar./Apr., 2012. http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/race-finished.
Smedley, Audrey, and Brian D. Smedley. Race in North America: Origin and Evolution of a Worldview. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2011, 4th ed.
Spencer, Quayshawn. “A Radical Solution to the Race Problem.” Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, no. 5, Dec. 2014, pp. 1025–38.
Stuurman, Siep. “François Bernier and the Invention of Racial Classification.” History Workshop Journal, no. 50, Autumn, 2000, pp. 1–21. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4289688.
Tattersall, Ian, and Rob DeSalle. RACE? Debunking a Scientific Myth. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 2011.
Tax, Sol. “Franz Boas, German-American Anthropologist.” Encyclopedia Britannica, May 2, 2017. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Franz-Boas#ref210125.
UNESCO, United Nations. “Four Statements on the Race Question,” 1950, 1951, 1967, 1970, published in 1969. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001229/122962eo.pdf.
University of Cambridge. “New Research Confirms ‘Out of Africa’ Theory of Human Evolution.” ScienceDaily. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070509161829.htm. Accessed June 9, 2017.
U.S. State Department. “The Immigration Act of 1924 (The Johnson-Reed Act).” Office of the Historian. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/immigration-act. Consulted June 3, 2017.
White, Leslie A. “The Ethnography and Ethnology of Franz Boas.” Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum, no. 6, Apr. 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Essay and Discussion Questions
Essay and Discussion Questions
-
1.
How were modern ideas of race different from older ideas of division within society?
-
2.
Explain how description and assessment figured into racialist and racist ideas of race.
-
3.
How was the idea of biological race retained by transitional thinkers such as Franz Boas and Claude Lévi-Strauss?
-
4.
Explain the difference between classificatory and evolutionary-historical genetic descriptions of human groups.
-
5.
How is the genetic difference within and between groups relevant to whether or not races exist in science?
-
6.
What are some problems with the idea of populations? If races were defined as populations, what problems would follow?
-
7.
Critically engage Andreasen’s suggestion that races are clades.
-
8.
Critically engage Hardimon’s idea of “minimal race.”
-
9.
What can be concluded from the fact that some people have genetic material related to ancestral origins that are different from how those people identify racially?
-
10.
Explain why the status of race as a real system in science is important for how we think about race.
Glossary
- clades
-
—multigenerational groups with distinctive traits forming after a split with a larger group, who have a common ancestor.
- clines
-
—traits that gradually change into other traits over geographical and climactic differences.
- ethnological studies
-
—anthropological studies of specific practices within different cultures.
- eugenics movement
-
—thought and policies based on the idea that only people judged superior relative to others should be permitted to have offspring.
- monogeny
-
—doctrine that all human varieties have a common evolutionary origin.
- pangenesis
-
—out of date theory that changes in bodily cells “drift” to genetic material, changing what can be inherited.
- polygenism
-
—doctrine that different human races have different evolutionary origins.
- population
-
—term for a group used by evolutionary biologists and anthropologists for a group of people in the same geographical area who breed mainly among themselves.
- racialism
-
—thought or action based on the belief that human races are real and the differences among races are important.
- reduction
-
—translating the terms for entities and principles studied in one science to entities and principles studied in another more basic or more rigorous science.
- revisionism
-
—changing knowledge as a valued practice.
- social construction
-
—an idea, thing, or practice that is created in society and not the result of anything natural or self-evident.
- social Darwinism
-
—late nineteenth and early twentieth-century misapplications of Darwinian evolution to support oppression and/or neglect of circumstances of nonwhites and poor in society.
- valorization
-
—positive value assessment.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zack, N. (2018). Race According to Biological Science. In: Philosophy of Race. Palgrave Philosophy Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78728-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78729-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)