Skip to main content

Young and Beautiful. Domestic Work Among Childless Women and Men

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Time Use in Domestic Settings Throughout the Life Course

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Sociology ((BRIEFSSOCY))

Abstract

This chapter examines the time use patterns of childless women and men living independently or in couples. Women and men at this stage are not expected to be strongly affected by dynamics of time availability, power and resources compared to older individuals and parents. In contrast, our results indicate that gender differences are present among both singles and partnered individuals. Gender differences peak among couples and especially for typically female activities such as cooking, cleaning the house and doing the laundry. The chapter also analyses whether individual characteristics—such as level of education, employment status and area of residence—affect time on and participation in housework. The results largely confirm previous findings: highly educated women do fewer chores than low educated ones and non-employed women do more. Moreover, women in the Southern regions and in the Islands tend to do more housework compared to the Northern area and men less, again confirm previous results on the large cultural differences within the country, with the South being more traditional. Thus, even among younger and, in principle, more modern Italians, women are doing significantly more housework than men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The percentages for women and men in Figs. 5.3 do not perfectly sum up to 100 because, to avoid imposing an excessively restrictive sample selection (i.e. both partners being in the same age group), we have also included subjects who are in the considered age group (20–44) but whose partner is above or below the thresholds.

  2. 2.

    In preliminary analyses gender differences were explicitly modelled by including both women and men in the regression and interacting a dummy variable for gender with all the main predictors of interest. The results indicated that the gender differences in the variables of interest were statistically significant.

  3. 3.

    Due to the relatively small number of observations in some response categories, the variable has been recoded from the original one presented in Table 5.1.

References

  • Anxo, D., Mencarini, L., PailhĂ©, A., Solaz, A., et al. (2011). Gender differences in time use over the life course in France,Italy, Sweden, and the US. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 159–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M. (2012). La divisione del lavoro domestico e delle attivitĂ  di cura nelle coppie italiane: un’analisi empirica. Stato e Mercato, 94(1), 161–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M. (2014). Men’s employment hours and time on domestic chores in European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1023–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(4), 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, D. V. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10(11–12), 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016a). LMF1.6: Gender differences in employment outcomes. Retrieved August 8, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016b). OECD Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2016. Retrieved September 11, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., & DrobniÄŤ, S. (2010). Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Maria Dotti Sani .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dotti Sani, G.M. (2018). Young and Beautiful. Domestic Work Among Childless Women and Men. In: Time Use in Domestic Settings Throughout the Life Course. SpringerBriefs in Sociology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78720-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78720-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78719-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78720-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics