Skip to main content
  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

Shoulder dystocia is an obstetric emergency with implications for both mother and baby. For the mother there is both the physical and psychological trauma of the delivery and for the baby the risk of obstetric brachial plexus injury, hypoxic damage and even death. Shoulder dystocia remains a highly litigious area in obstetrics even when cases are appropriately managed. Because it is difficult to predict antenatally, the focus for management is around adequate training particularly using simulation drills. Accurate documentation is also a key factor particularly with respect to the anterior shoulder. This chapter deals with the importance of following national guidance regarding mode of delivery and highlights the importance of the accurate documentation of the event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crofts J, Fox R, Draycott T. Shoulder dystocia. In: RCOG, editor. Greentop guidelines. London: RCOG; 2012. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chauhan S, Blackwell SB, Ananth CV. Neonatal brachial plexus palsy: incidence, prevalence, and temporal trends. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(4):210–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Angelini DJ, Greenwald L. Closed claims analysis of 65 medical malpractice cases involving nurse-midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005;50(6):454–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henary BY, et al. Epidemiology of medico-legal litigations and related medical errors in Central and Northern Saudi Arabia. A retrospective prevalence study. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(7):768–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. NHS Litigation Authority. Ten years of maternity claims: an analysis of NHS litigation authority data. London: NHS Litigation Authority; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox R, Yelland A, Draycott T. Analysis of legal claims--informing litigation systems and quality improvement. BJOG. 2014;121(1):6–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crofts J, et al. In: RCOG, editor. RCOG Greentop Guideline 42: shoulder dystocia. London: RCOG; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Draycott T, Fox R, Montague I. In: RCOG, editor. RCOG Greentop Guideline 42: shoulder dystocia. London: RCOG; 2005. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Draycott T, et al. A template for reviewing the strength of evidence for obstetric brachial plexus injury in clinical negligence claims. Clin Risk. 2008;14(3):96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Draycott TJ, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crofts JF, et al. Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations: lessons for skills training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):906–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leung T, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of shoulder dystocia alleviated by different type and sequence of manoeuvres: a retrospective review. BJOG. 2011;118(8):985–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crofts JF, et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury-12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study. BJOG. 2016;123(1):111–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. RCOG. Choosing to have a caesarean section. London: RCOG; 2015. p. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boulvain M, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9987):2600–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gherman R. A guest editorial: new insights to shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus palsy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noble A. Brachial plexus injuries and shoulder dystocia: medico-legal commentary and implications. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(2):105–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. Erb’s palsy: concepts of causation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):941–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mollberg M, et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a prospective study on risk factors related to manual assistance during the second stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(2):198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beall MH, Spong CY, Ross MG. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic maneuvers to reduce head-to-body delivery time in patients at risk for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(1):31–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gherman RB, et al. Neonatal brachial plexus injury. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Metaizeau J, Gayet C, Plenat F. Les lesions obstetricales du plexus brachial. Chir Pediatr. 1979;20(3):159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung TY, Chung TK. Severe chronic morbidity following childbirth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(3):401–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mollberg M, et al. Comparison in obstetric management on infants with transient and persistent obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Child Neurol. 2008;23(12):1424–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poggi SH, et al. Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):725–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung TY, et al. Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review. BJOG. 2011;118(4):474–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Draycott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Draycott, T., Crofts, J. (2018). Shoulder Dystocia. In: Jha, S., Ferriman, E. (eds) Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78682-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78683-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics