Abstract
In this chapter, I compare qualitative research, primarily from ethnographic studies of surrogacy in two countries where it is regulated and practiced differently: Israel and India. My aim is to contribute to surrogacy-related policy discussions by comparatively analysing empirical work by sociologists and anthropologists on transnational Indian surrogacy with my own work on surrogacy in Israel. I ask: What are the main themes that arise from the ethnographic comparison of surrogacy research in Israel and India and how might these themes translate into more informed policy considerations? Can ethnographic conclusions help us formulate empirically-based criteria towards regulating surrogacy, and could restrictive regulation of surrogacy create the grounds for a more ethical practice?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Berend, Z. (2012). The romance of surrogacy. Sociological Forum, 27(4), 913–936.
Berend, Z. (2016). The online world of surrogacy. London: Berghan Books.
Deomampo, D. (2013). Gendered geographies of reproductive tourism. Gender & Society, 27(4), 514–537.
Deomampo, D. (2016). Transnational reproduction: Race, kinship and commercial surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
Donath, O. (2010). Pro-natalism and its ‘cracks’: Narratives of reproduction and childfree lifestyles in Israel. Israeli Sociology, 11(2), 417–439 [Hebrew].
Google Baby. (2009). [Film] Directed by Zippi Brand Frank. Israel: Brandcom Productions.
Goslinga-Roy, G. (2000). Body boundaries, fictions of the female self: An ethnographic perspective on power, feminism and the reproductive technologies. Feminist Studies, 26(1), 113–140.
Haimes, E. (2002). What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics, 16(2), 89–113.
Harrison, L. (2014). ‘I am the baby’s real mother’: Reproductive tourism, race, and the transnational construction of kinship. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 145–156.
Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2009). Rethinking reproductive ‘tourism’ as reproductive ‘exile’. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 904–906.
Jacobsen, H. (2016). Labor of love: Gestational surrogacy and the work of making babies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Kahn, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kirby, J. (2014). Transnational gestational surrogacy: Does it have to be exploitative? The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(5), 24–32.
Krones, T., Schlüter, E., Neuwohner, E., El Ansari, S., Wissner, T., & Richter, G. (2006). What is the preimplantation embryo? Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 1–20.
Makherjee, R., & Sekher, T. (2015). Women at risk in the unregulated surrogacy ‘industry’. Economic & Political Weekly, 1(26–27), 83–89.
Markens, S. (2010). Interrogating narratives about the global surrogacy market. The Scholar and Feminist Online, Special Issue, 9(1–2). http://sfonline.barnard.edu/reprotech/markens_01.htm. Accessed on April 4, 2017.
Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1745–1753.
Mitra, S. (2015, September 9–11). Reproductive disruptions during surrogacy: End of a beginning. Magic 2015 Anthropology Conference: Session on reproductive disruptions & flows: Surrogacy & obstetric care in India and the US, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
Mitra, S. (2017). Disruptive embodiments: An ethnography of risks and failures during commercial surrogacy in India. Ph.D. dissertation, Social Science Faculty, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Mohapatra, S. (2012). Stateless babies and adoption scams: A bioethical analysis of international commercial surrogacy. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 30(2), 412–450.
Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
Parry, B. (2015). Narratives of neoliberalism: ‘Clinical labour’ in context. Critical Medical Humanities, 41, 32–37.
Ragoné, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: Conception in the heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ragoné, H. (1999). Surrogate motherhood, gamete donation, and constructions of altruism. In L. L. Layne (Ed.), Transformative motherhood: On giving and getting in a consumer culture (pp. 65–88). New York: New York University Press.
Roberts, E. F. S. (1998a). Examining surrogacy discourses: Between feminine power and exploitation. In N. Scheper-Hughes & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Small wars: The cultural politics of childhood (pp. 93–110). Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Roberts, E. F. S. (1998b). Native narratives of connectedness: Surrogate motherhood and technology. In J. Dumit and R. Davis-Floyd (Eds.), Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to rechno-tots (pp. 193–211). New York: Routledge.
Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
Saravanan, S. (2013). An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8(10), 1–12.
Singh, H. D. (2014). “The world’s back womb?”: Commercial surrogacy and infertility inequalities in India. American Anthropologist, 116(4), 824–828.
Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015). Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: A mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(5), 465–472.
Teman, E. (2008). The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood. Social Science and Medicine, 67(7), 1104–1112.
Teman, E. (2009). The last outpost of the nuclear family: A cultural critique of Israeli surrogacy policy. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & Y. Carmeli (Eds.), Kin, gene, community reproductive technologies among Jewish Israelis (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Teman, E. (2010a). Birthing a mother: The surrogate body and the pregnant self. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Teman, E. (2010b). The last outpost of the nuclear family: A cultural critique of Israeli surrogacy policy. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & Y. Carmeli (Eds.), Kin, gene, community: Reproductive technology among Jewish Israelis (pp. 107–126). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Teman, E. (2016). Surrogacy in Israel: State-controlled surrogacy as a mechanism of symbolic control. In E. S. Sills (Ed.), Handbook of gestational surrogacy: International clinical practice and policy issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Twine, F. W. (2011). Outsourcing the womb: Race, class and gestational surrogacy in a global market. Framing 21st century social issues. New York: Routledge.
Vora, K. (2009). Indian transnational surrogacy and the disaggregation of mothering work. Anthropology News, p. 9.
Vora, K. (2014). Experimental sociality and gestational surrogacy in the Indian ART clinic. Ethnos, 79(1), 63–83.
Whittaker, A. (2014). Merit and money: The situated ethics of transnational commercial surrogacy in Thailand. The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 7(2), 100–120.
Zandi, M., Vanaki, Z., Shiva, M., & Mohammadi, E. (2014). Nine centuries waiting: The experiences of Iranian surrogacy commissioning mothers. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 19(3), 224–232.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank my husband, Avi Solomon, for his comments and suggestions on multiple versions of this manuscript. I would also like to thank Diane L. Wolf, who first inspired me to think about surrogacy in Israel and India comparatively at a conference she organised at UC Davis in 2009. I also thank Zsuzsa Berend for always inspiring me to think about surrogacy in a comparative framework and the anonymous reviewer of this chapter for the helpful suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teman, E. (2018). A Case for Restrictive Regulation of Surrogacy? An Indo-Israeli Comparison of Ethnographic Studies. In: Mitra, S., Schicktanz, S., Patel, T. (eds) Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78669-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78670-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)