Abstract
In this chapter, we describe the German legal prohibitions against egg donation and surrogacy. We explore how German physicians and other persons are criminally liable if they provide information about services at reproductive clinics abroad that are prohibited within Germany by the German law. The main discussion of this chapter addresses concerns pertaining to the family and private international law that arise once a baby has been born through surrogacy aborad and the intended parents travel to their home country with the child. We show how the courts increasingly accept solutions serving the wellbeing of children rather than enforcing the strict German stance against surrogacy. Finally, we take a critical look at the current legal situation recommending to change the German law and to replace absolute prohibitions with controlled and supervised procedures for egg donation and surrogacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Birnbacher, D. (1996). Ambiguities in the concept of Menschenwürde. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Sanctity of life and human dignity (pp. 107–121). Heidelberg: Springer.
Brunet, L., Carruthers, J., Davaki, K., King, D., Marzo, C., & Marzo, C. (2013). A comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in EU member states. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-JURI_ET%282013%29474403. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Coester-Waltjen, D. (2016). Family forms and parenthood in Germany. In A. Büchler & H. Keller (Eds.), Family forms and parenthood. Theory and practice of article 8 ECHR in Europe (pp. 201–236). Cambridge: Intersentia.
Conklin, C. (2014). Simply inconsistent: Surrogacy laws in the United States and the pressing need for regulation. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 35, 67.
Dethloff, N. (2014). Leihmütter, Wunscheltern und ihre Kinder. Juristenzeitung, 69, 922.
Dethloff, N. (2015). Changing family forms: Challenges for German law. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 46, 671.
Dethloff, N. (2016). Anmerkung. Juristenzeitung, 71, 207.
Dethloff, N., & Ramser, C. (2007). Tensions between biological and social conceptions of parentage in German Law. In I. Schwenzer (Ed.), Tensions between biological and social conceptions of parentage (pp. 177–210). Cambridge: Intersentia.
Duden, K. (2015a). Leihmutterschaft im Internationalen Privat-und Verfahrensrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Duden, K. (2015b). International surrogate motherhood: Shifting the focus to the child. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht, 23, 637–660.
Engel, M. (2014). Cross-border surrogacy: Time for a convention. In K. Boele-Woelki, N. Dethloff, & W. Gephart (Eds.), Family law and culture in Europe. Developments, challenges and opportunities (pp. 199–216). Cambridge et al.: Intersentia.
Gassner, U. et al. (2013). Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz, Augsburg-Münchner Entwurf. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Golombok, G., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Marks, A., & Jadva, V. (2011). Families created through surrogacy: Mother-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment at age 7. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1579–1588.
Gössl, S. (2013). Country-report: Germany. In K. Trimmings & P. Beaumont (Eds.), International surrogacy arrangements. Legal regulation at the international level (pp. 131–142). Oxford and Portland: Hart.
Helms, T. (2016). Rechtliche, biologische und soziale Elternschaft: Herausforderungen durch neue Familienformen. Gutachten F zum 71. Deutschen Juristentag. München: C.H. Beck.
Hörnle, T. (2013). Menschenwürde und Ersatzmutterschaft. In J. Joerden, E. Hilgendorf, & F. Thiele (Eds.), Menschenwürde und Medizin. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (pp. 743–754). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Hüppe, H. (2015). Legalisierung der Eizellspende? Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 48, 126.
Jadva, J., Imrie, S., & Golombok, S. (2014). Surrogate mothers 10 years on: A longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and child. Human Reproduction, 30, 373.
Knecht, M. (2017). Reproduktives Reisen und die Herstellung von Verwandtschaft. Available at http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/fb-22-03-2017-simultanmitschrift.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.
Kreß, H. (2013). Samenspende und Leihmutterschaft: Problemstand, Rechtsunsicherheiten, Regelungsansätze. Familie, Partnerschaft, Recht, 240–243.
Lehmann, M. (2007). Die In-vitro-Fertilisation und ihre Folgen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Mayer Lewis, B. (2017). Lebensweltlicher Ansatz, individuelle Sicht der Problematik [pdf]. Available at http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/fb-22-03-2017-simultanmitschrift.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.
Müller-Terpitz, R. (2016). ‘ESchG 2.0’: Plädoyer für eine partielle Reform des Embryonen-schutzgesetzes. Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 49, 51.
Resnik, D. B. (2001). Regulating the market for human eggs. Bioethics, 15, 1–25.
Rost, C. (2014). Kinderwunsch in der Grauzone. Süddeutsche Zeitung [online]. Available at http://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/prozess-in-muenchen-kinderwunsch-in-der-grauzone-1.2049308. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Spiewak, M. (2013). Strafsache Kinderwunsch, DIE ZEIT [online]. Available at http://www.zeit.de/2013/34/kinderwunsch-justiz-embryonenschutzgesetz/komplettansicht. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Valerius, B. (2017). Kinderwunschbehandlungen im Ausland. Zeitschrift für Medizinstrafrecht, 3, 20–27.
Wiesemann, C. (2017). Streitgespräch: Der ethisch angemessene Umgang mit den bestehenden Problemen. Available at http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/fb-22-03-2017-simultanmitschrift.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.
Wilson, T. (2017). Unravelling orders in a borderless Europe? Cross-border reproductive care and the paradoxes of assisted reproductive technology policy in Germany and Poland. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.02.002. Accessed 27 June 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dücker, S., Hörnle, T. (2018). German Law on Surrogacy and Egg Donation: The Legal Logic of Restrictions. In: Mitra, S., Schicktanz, S., Patel, T. (eds) Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78669-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78670-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)