Abstract
The concluding chapter revisits the theoretical model building on the hierarchies of care ideals concept, formulated in Chapter 4 and empirically illustrated in Chapters 5–7. The discussion then proceeds to outlining the main conceptual contributions of the volume, revisiting the empirical findings that underpin these. The chapter reiterates the various rationales that warrant the study of the organisation of childcare and the making of childcare decisions as objects of analysis in their own right. It also reiterates the analytical distinction between mothers’ work-care decisions and families’ childcare decisions. It restates the familial, negotiated character of childcare decisions and, not least, emphasises the argument that family policies matter in different ways and to different extents to different families. Finally, the chapter reiterates the crucial relevance of structural labour market conditions for post-partum maternal employment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10, 85–113.
Braun, A., Vincent, C., & Ball, S. (2008). ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’—Working class mothers, paid work and childcare. Journal of Education Policy, 23, 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802054370.
Debacker, M. (2008). Care strategies among high- and low-skilled mothers: A world of difference? Work, Employment & Society, 22, 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017008093476.
Dodson, L. (2007). Wage-poor mothers and moral economy. Social Politics, 14, 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm007.
Drobnič, S., & Guillén, A. M. (2011). Work-life balance in Europe: The role of job quality, work and welfare in Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work, and gendered moral rationalities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2003). Motherhood, paid work and partnering: Values and theories. Work, Employment & Society, 17, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003017002005.
Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2004). Mothers and child care: Policies, values and theories. Children & Society, 18, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.800.
Duvander, A.-Z., & Ellingsæter, A. L. (2016). Cash for childcare schemes in the Nordic welfare states: Diverse paths, diverse outcomes. European Societies, 18, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2015.1124903.
Ellingsæter, A. L., & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the childcare gap: The interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36, 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279407001225.
Eurofound. (2017). Reactivate: Employment opportunities for economically inactive people. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (2007). Working conditions in the European Union: The gender perspective. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Ferrarini, T. (2006). Families, states and labour markets: Institutions, causes and consequences of family policy in post-war welfare states. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fodor, E., Glass, C., Kawachi, J., & Popescu, L. (2002). Family policies and gender in Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Gender and the Experience of Poverty in Eastern Europe and Russia After 1989, 35, 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(02)00030-2.
Himmelweit, S., & Sigala, M. (2004). Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: Some implications for policy from a UK study. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404007779.
Hobson, B. (2013). Work-life balance: The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (1990). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. London: Piatkus.
Holdsworth, C., & Morgan, D. H. J. (2005). Transitions in context: Leaving home, independence and adulthood. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Inglot, T., Szikra, D., & Raţ, C. (2012). Reforming post-communist welfare states. Problems of Post-Communism, 59, 27–49. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216590603.
Kovács, B. (2015a). “The totality of caring”: Conceptualising childcare arrangements for empirical research. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 35, 699–719.
Kovács, B. (2015b). Managing access to full-time public daycare and preschool services in Romania: Planfulness, cream-skimming and “interventions”. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2014.09.001.
Kremer, M. (2007). How welfare states care: Culture, gender and parenting in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Lendvai, N., & Stubbs, P. (2009). Assemblages, translation, and intermediaries in Southeast Europe: Rethinking transnationalism and social policy. European Societies, 11, 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690802475504.
Lewis, J. (2003). Developing early years childcare in england, 1997–2002: The choices for (working) mothers. Social Policy and Administration, 37(3), 219–238.
Lewis, J. (Ed.). (2006). Children, changing families and welfare states. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices, Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD. (2016). OECD Family Database—PF3.2: Enrolment in childcare and pre-school. OECD.
Open Society Institute. (2007). Equal access to quality education for Roma. Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Serbia (Vol. 1) (Monitoring Report). Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies, 7, 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500083592.
Pfau-Effinger, B., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Care between work and welfare in European societies, work and welfare in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Popescu, L. (2006). Child care, family and state in post-socialist Romania. In M. Mesner & M. Wolfgruber (Eds.), The policies of reproduction at the turn of the 21st Century. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
Popescu, R. (2015). The evolution of the financial support for family in Romania after the economic crisis. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 15, 93–119.
Saxonberg, S. (2014). Gendering family policies in post-communist Europe: A historical-institutional analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Skinner, C. (2005). Coordination points: A hidden factor in reconciling work and family life. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008281.
Stefansen, K., & Farstad, G. R. (2010). Classed parental practices in a modern welfare state: Caring for the under threes in Norway. Critical Social Policy, 30, 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309350811.
Vandenbroeck, M., De Visscher, S., Van Nuffel, K., & Ferla, J. (2008). Mothers’ search for infant child care: The dynamic relationship between availability and desirability in a Continental European welfare state. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.002.
Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2006). Childcare, choice and class practices: Middle class parents and their children. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kovács, B. (2018). Conclusion: Theorising Childcare Decisions. In: Family Policy and the Organisation of Childcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78661-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78661-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78660-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78661-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)