Advertisement

Parents’ Employment Trajectories: Two Worlds of Work-Care Experiences

  • Borbála Kovács
Chapter

Abstract

In further documenting the systematic income- and qualification-based differences between two-earner, higher-income families and their single-earner and jobless, low-income peers, this chapter hones in on parents’ post-partum employment transitions and long-term employment trajectories. The chapter starts with a concise overview of Romanian labour market conditions and employment trends, outlining different forms of labour precariousness, including long working hours and underdeclared and undeclared labour market participation. The discussion then moves on to present in detail leave-taking decisions and post-partum employment transitions, revealing qualification-based differences in post-partum employment among mothers especially. The third section hones in on long-term inactive families’ employment prospects, showing how early motherhood in the context of low educational attainment and social exclusion lead not only to long-term inactivity, but also severe poverty, financial dependency and gendered subordination. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the crucial relevance of job quality and local labour market conditions in shaping working and non-working parents’ post-partum employment trajectories.

References

  1. Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work, and gendered moral rationalities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eurofound. (2017). Reactivate: Employment opportunities for economically inactive people. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2017). European semester thematic factsheet—Undeclared work. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed on Jan 13 2018 at https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_undeclared-work_en.pdf.
  4. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. (2007). Working conditions in the European Union: The gender perspective. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  5. Eurostat. (2010). Database by themes: Population and social conditions. Labour Force Survey ad-hoc modules (lfso)—2010. Accessed between December 2017 and January 2018 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  6. Eurostat. (2017a). Database by themes: Economy and finance. Accessed between December 2017 and January 2018 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  7. Eurostat. (2017b). Database by themes: Population and social conditions. Accessed between December 2017 and January 2018 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  8. Eurostat. (2017c). Database by themes: Population and social conditions—Labour market (labour). Accessed between December 2017 and January 2018 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  9. Eurostat. (2017d). Database by themes: Population and social conditions—Income, consumption and wealth—Experimental statistics (icw). Accessed between December 2017 and January 2018 at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
  10. Himmelweit, S. (2002). Attitudes and caring behaviour: A model with positive feedback (Working Paper No. 26). ESRC Future of Work Programme, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  11. Himmelweit, S., & Sigala, M. (2004). Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: Some implications for policy from a UK study. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 455–478.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404007779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kovács, B. (2015a). “The totality of caring”: Conceptualising childcare arrangements for empirical research. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kovács, B. (2015b). Managing access to full-time public daycare and preschool services in Romania: Planfulness, cream-skimming and “interventions.” Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6, 6–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2014.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovács, B., Polese, A., & Morris, J. (2017). Adjusting social welfare and social policy in central and eastern Europe: Growth, crisis and recession. In P. Kennett & N. Lendvai-Bainton (Eds.), Handbook of European social policy (pp. 194–217). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly Persons. (2015). Setul național de indicatori de incluziune socială corespunzători anului 2014 [The national set of social inclusion indicators for 2014]. Bucharest: Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly Persons.Google Scholar
  16. Parlevliet, J., & Xenogiani, T. (2008). Report on informal employment in Romania (OECD Development Centre Working Papers 4–83).Google Scholar
  17. Pungello, E. P., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2000). Working women’s selection of care for their infants: A prospective study. Family Relations, 49, 245–255.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00245.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Williams, C. C., & Horodnic, I. A. (2017). Under-declaring work, falsely declaring work: Under-declared employment in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed December 16 2017 at http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=18376&langId=en.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations