Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probing the New Analytical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

The outline for a person-centered praxeology takes its point of departure in the methodological framing of zooming in and zooming out (Nicolini in Organ Stud 30:1391–1418, 2009), as discussed in Chapter 5. The zooming-in part combines the approaches of integrational linguistics and ethnomethodology and conversation analysis methodologically. Zooming in traces significant trajectories across excerpts, whereas zooming out describes larger frames of practices. Building upon the discussion from previous chapters, the pros and cons of combining analytical concepts are discussed. The analytical framework in this chapter is presented along with video data. Frames of practices are unfolded in order to establish a base on which to inform professional practice about their social consequences. An abductive element of the analytical strategy is given attention and scrutinized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discours Analysis Online, 1(1). http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/previous/v1/n1/index.htm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminen, I. (2000). On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse and Society, 11(4), 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayass, R. (2015). Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 17(5), 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult–child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M., & Bloch, S. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication AAC practices in everyday interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. (2011). Forståelseshandlingen. En empirisk afprøvet teori om narrativ forståelse som situeret betydning i dannelse. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet, København.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damm, B. (2016). Sproglig betydningsdannelse i teori og praksis: En teoretisk og empirisk videreudvikling af det integrerede sprogsyn. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet, København.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2005). Den integrerende kommunikationsmodel. In P. Widell & M. Kunøe (Eds.), 10. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog (pp. 137–146). Aarhus: Fællestrykkeriet for Sundhedsvidenskab og Humaniora Aarhus Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2011). On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language. Language Sciences, 33(4), 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, N., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glintborg, C. (2015). Disabled and not normal. Narrative Inquiry, 25(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. (1983). Aggravated correction and disagreement in childrens’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. (2017). Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive construction of intimacy through touch. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 73–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In A. Peräkylä & M. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009a). Integrationist notes and papers 2006–2008. Gamlingay: A Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009b). After epistemology. Gamlingay: A Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, T. (2009). Participation and exclusion in third party complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2435–2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, T., & Traverso, V. (2009). Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2381–2384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Origin. 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters (Origin. 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29(3), 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E. (2014a). Noticing: Talk, gestures, movement and objects in video analysis. In Lee, R., et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of human geography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurier, E. (2014b). The graphic transcript: Poaching comic book grammar for inscribing the visual, spatial and temporal aspects of action. Geography Compass, 8(4), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, C., & Penn, P. (2013). Uncertainty, vulnerability, and isolation: Factors framing quality of life with aphasia in a South African township. In N. Warren & L. Manderson (Eds.), Reframing disability and quality of life: A global perspective (pp. 17–37). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analyzing sign language talk. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1993). Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 241–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., & Brown, S. (2005). The social psychology of experience: Studies in remembering and forgetting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2009). The methodological organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 558–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription (3.0.1. ed.). Retrieved December 5, 2017, from https://mainly.sciencesconf.org/conference/mainly/pages/Mondada2013_conv_multimodality_copie.pdf. (Origin. 2001).

  • Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. & Dyck, I. (2003). Women, body, illness: Space and identity in the everyday lives of women with chronic illness. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naur, P. (2008). The neural embodiment of mental life by the synapse-state theory. Gentofte: Naur.Com Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization—An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2011). Towards applied integrationism: Integrating autism in teaching and coaching Sessions. Language Sciences, 33(4), 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2015). Senhjerneskade i et forståelsesperspektiv. In S. Frimann, M. Sørensen, & H. Wentzer (Eds.), Sammenhænge i sundhedskommunikation (pp. 247–281). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orman, J. (2017). Indeterminacy in sociolinguistics and integrationist theory. In A. Pablé (Ed.), Critical humanist perspectives: The integrational turn in philosophy of language and communication (pp. 96–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pablé, A., & Hutton, C. (2015). Signs, meaning and experience. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, H. (2008). Mental health and social space: Towards inclusionary geographies? Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1995). Pragmatisme og abduktion. In L. Andersen (Trans.), Semiotik og pragmatisme (pp. 163–178). København: Gyldendal (Origin. 1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: Interactional issues. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J., & Ramey, M. (2015). Parents resources for facilitating the activities of children with autism at home. In J. N. Lester & M. O’Reilly (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp. 459–479). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudaskoski, P. (1999). The use of communicative resources in language technology environments: A conversation analytic approach to semiosis at computer media. PhD dissertation, University of Oulu, Oulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudaskoski, P. (2013). From understanding to participation: A relational approach to embodied practices. In T. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen, & M. Siromaa (Eds.), Multimodal discourses of participation, AfinLA yearbook (Vol. 71, pp. 103–121). Jyväskylä: Suomen Soveltavan Kielitieteen Yhdistyks (AFinLA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldert, C., Johansson, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). An interaction-focused intervention approach to training everyday communication partners: A single case study. Aphasiology, 29(3), 378–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, S. (2007). The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text and Talk, 27(5/6), 567–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2013). Activity as an indeterminate social event. In S. Reynolds, D. Egan, & A. Weneland (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Heidegger: Pathways and provocations (pp. 179–194). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (2001). Getting serious: Joke -> serious ‘no’ ✰. Squib. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1947–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00073-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E., Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. (2008). Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: Issues of voice and identity. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T., & Cameron, D. (1987). Analysing conversation—Rules and units in the structure of talk. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Have, P. (2004). Understanding qualitative research and ethnomethodology. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Dorze, G., Isaksen, J., Pak, A., et al. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(14), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behavior: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 32–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Lock, S., Bayley, K., Maxim, J., Bruce, C., et al. (1998). Therapy using conversation analysis: Helping couples adapt to aphasia in conversation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 144–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worsøe, L. (2014). Nye ord på nye måder: Nyorddannelse belyst fra et dynamisk sprog- og kognitionssyn. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet, København.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen

Authors
  1. Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klemmensen, C.M.B. (2018). Probing the New Analytical Perspective. In: Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78633-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78634-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation