Abstract
Traditionally, problems with language and communication have been approached through a discourse of disabledness or deficiency. In contract, this book explores and challenges this understanding, turning the spotlight on divergent discourses in current research in language and communication disorders (LCDs). Two cases are compared for this purpose: autism and aphasia. Studies in autism presuppose the mind to be an impersonal decoding machine. On the other hand, studies in aphasia presuppose the social to be the essence of human existence. In this view, co-construction of meaning and participation have replaced the individualist stance. In consequence, aphasia studies are enhancing a discourse of abledness while traditional autism studies are advocating a discourse of disabledness. Accordingly, explanation for the development in aphasia studies is sought.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: APA Publishing.
Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Aphasiology. (1999). Special issue. Conversation Analysis, 13(4–5), 251–258.
Aphasiology. (2015). Special issue. Conversation and Aphasia: Advances in Analysis and Intervention, 29(3), 257–268.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(19), 37–49.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Björne, P. (2007). A possible world. PhD dissertation. Lund University, Cognitive Studies 134, Lund.
Brinkmann, S. (Ed.). (2010). Det diagnosticerede liv. Aarhus: Forlaget Klim.
Bøttcher, D., & Dammeyer, J. (2010). Handicappsykologi: En grundbog om arbejdet med mennesker med funktionsnedsættelser. København: Samfundslitteratur.
Duncker, D. (2011). On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language. Language Sciences, 33(4), 533–543.
First, M., Frances, A., & Pincus, H. (2004). DSM-IV-TR guide book. Vancouver: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
Fleming, D. (1995). The search for an integrational account of language: Roy Harris and conversation analysis. Language Sciences, 17(1), 73–98.
Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Gergen, K. (2015). Toward a relational humanism. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 54(2), 149–165.
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003a). Conversation and brain damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, C. (2003b). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, R. (1996). Signs, language and communication. London: Routledge.
Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Harris, R. (2004). Integrationism, language, mind and world. Language Sciences, 26(6), 727–739.
Harris, R. (2009). Integrating autism. Integrationist notes and papers 2006–2008 (pp. 13–16). Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
Korkiakangas, T., Dindar, K., Laitila, A., & Kärnä, E. (2016). The Sally-Anne test: An interactional analysis of a dyadic assessment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51(6), 685–702.
Krummheuer, A. (2015). Performing an action on cannot do: Participation, scaffolding and embodied interaction. Journal of International Research in Communication Disorders, 6(2), 187–210.
Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.
Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2011). Against theory of mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Love, N. (2007). Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29(5), 690–709.
McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analysing sign language talk. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
McIlvenny, P., & Raudaskoski, P. (1994). Sign language and deaf interaction: A preliminary study of sign talk in Northern Finland. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman, & M. Brennan (Eds.), Perspectives in sign language usage (pp. 269–291). Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association.
Nielsen, C. (2011). Towards applied integrationism: Integrating autism in teaching and coaching sessions. Language Sciences, 33(4), 593–602.
Nielsen, C. (2013). Integrating the mind: An analysis of the methaphorical terminology in autism research. Guldbæk: Anvendt Ny Integrationel Lingvistik.
Nielsen, C. (2015). Senhjerneskade i et forståelsesperspektiv. S. Frimann, M. Sørensen, & H. Wentzer (Eds.), Sammenhænge i sundhedskommunikation. (pp. 247–281). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Pablé, A., & Hutton, C. (2015). Signs, meaning and experience. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: Interactional issues. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rae, J., & Ramey, M. (2015). Parents resources for facilitating the activities of children with autism at home. In J. N. Lester & M. O’Reilly (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp. 459–479). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raudaskoski, P. (2013). From understanding to participation: A relational approach to embodied practices. In T. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen, & M. Siromaa. (Eds.), Multimodal discourses of participation, AfinLA yearbook (Vol. 71, pp. 103–121). Jyväskylä: Suomen Soveltavan Kielitieteen Yhdistyks (AFinLA). ISSN 0781-0318.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E., Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.
Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. (2008). Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: Issues of voice and identity. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43(1), 5–17.
Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228.
Sterponi, L., & de Kirby, K. (2016). A multidimensional reappraisal of language in autism—Insights from a discourse analytic study. Special issue: Discourse and conversation analytic approaches to the study of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 46, 394–405.
Tammet, D. (2006). Born on a blue day: Inside the extraordinary mind of an autistic savant. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Wilkinson, R. (1999a). Introduction. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 251–258.
Wilkinson, R. (1999b). Sequentiality as a problem and a resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 327–343.
Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behavior: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 32–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29(3), 257–268.
Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 74–87.
World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2013). How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2015). International classification of health interventions ICHI. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2016). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems ICD-10 (10th ver., 2016 ed.). Geneva: WHO (Origin. 1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klemmensen, C.M.B. (2018). Language and Communication Disorders as an Area of Study. In: Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78633-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78634-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)