Skip to main content

Abstract

Traditionally, problems with language and communication have been approached through a discourse of disabledness or deficiency. In contract, this book explores and challenges this understanding, turning the spotlight on divergent discourses in current research in language and communication disorders (LCDs). Two cases are compared for this purpose: autism and aphasia. Studies in autism presuppose the mind to be an impersonal decoding machine. On the other hand, studies in aphasia presuppose the social to be the essence of human existence. In this view, co-construction of meaning and participation have replaced the individualist stance. In consequence, aphasia studies are enhancing a discourse of abledness while traditional autism studies are advocating a discourse of disabledness. Accordingly, explanation for the development in aphasia studies is sought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: APA Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aphasiology. (1999). Special issue. Conversation Analysis, 13(4–5), 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aphasiology. (2015). Special issue. Conversation and Aphasia: Advances in Analysis and Intervention, 29(3), 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(19), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björne, P. (2007). A possible world. PhD dissertation. Lund University, Cognitive Studies 134, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (Ed.). (2010). Det diagnosticerede liv. Aarhus: Forlaget Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøttcher, D., & Dammeyer, J. (2010). Handicappsykologi: En grundbog om arbejdet med mennesker med funktionsnedsættelser. København: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2011). On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language. Language Sciences, 33(4), 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, M., Frances, A., & Pincus, H. (2004). DSM-IV-TR guide book. Vancouver: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (1995). The search for an integrational account of language: Roy Harris and conversation analysis. Language Sciences, 17(1), 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigma (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2015). Toward a relational humanism. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 54(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (Ed.). (2003a). Conversation and brain damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2003b). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1996). Signs, language and communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2004). Integrationism, language, mind and world. Language Sciences, 26(6), 727–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009). Integrating autism. Integrationist notes and papers 2006–2008 (pp. 13–16). Gamlingay: Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkiakangas, T., Dindar, K., Laitila, A., & Kärnä, E. (2016). The Sally-Anne test: An interactional analysis of a dyadic assessment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51(6), 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, A. (2015). Performing an action on cannot do: Participation, scaffolding and embodied interaction. Journal of International Research in Communication Disorders, 6(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2011). Against theory of mind. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (2007). Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29(5), 690–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: Analysing sign language talk. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organisation of talk and embodied activities (pp. 129–150). Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvenny, P., & Raudaskoski, P. (1994). Sign language and deaf interaction: A preliminary study of sign talk in Northern Finland. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman, & M. Brennan (Eds.), Perspectives in sign language usage (pp. 269–291). Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2011). Towards applied integrationism: Integrating autism in teaching and coaching sessions. Language Sciences, 33(4), 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2013). Integrating the mind: An analysis of the methaphorical terminology in autism research. Guldbæk: Anvendt Ny Integrationel Lingvistik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2015). Senhjerneskade i et forstĂĄelsesperspektiv. S. Frimann, M. Sørensen, & H. Wentzer (Eds.), Sammenhænge i sundhedskommunikation. (pp. 247–281). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • PablĂ©, A., & Hutton, C. (2015). Signs, meaning and experience. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation: Interactional issues. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J., & Ramey, M. (2015). Parents resources for facilitating the activities of children with autism at home. In J. N. Lester & M. O’Reilly (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of child mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp. 459–479). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudaskoski, P. (2013). From understanding to participation: A relational approach to embodied practices. In T. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen, & M. Siromaa. (Eds.), Multimodal discourses of participation, AfinLA yearbook (Vol. 71, pp. 103–121). Jyväskylä: Suomen Soveltavan Kielitieteen Yhdistyks (AFinLA). ISSN 0781-0318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E., Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. (2008). Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: Issues of voice and identity. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterponi, L., & de Kirby, K. (2016). A multidimensional reappraisal of language in autism—Insights from a discourse analytic study. Special issue: Discourse and conversation analytic approaches to the study of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 46, 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammet, D. (2006). Born on a blue day: Inside the extraordinary mind of an autistic savant. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (1999a). Introduction. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (1999b). Sequentiality as a problem and a resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4–5), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behavior: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 32–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29(3), 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). The international classification of functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2013). How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2015). International classification of health interventions ICHI. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2016). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems ICD-10 (10th ver., 2016 ed.). Geneva: WHO (Origin. 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klemmensen, C.M.B. (2018). Language and Communication Disorders as an Area of Study. In: Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78633-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78634-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics