Project Monitoring, Control, and Evaluation: The Unique Aspects of Projects in Schools

  • Miri Yemini
  • Izhar Oplatka
  • Netta Sagie


This chapter focuses on the process of evaluating the project success: first, briefly, in the broad context of the business and industrial literature and afterwards with reference to the unique aspects of educational projects executed in schools. It is important to note that a considerable portion of project management literature deals with strategies to increase the project success; however, we will not discuss this subject here, but rather focus on evaluation of project success. Next, we will present a specific aspect of the process of monitoring and control—managing the risks in projects—while emphasizing the unique characteristics of project management in the educational field, which in certain contexts requires a specific approach to this subject.


Evaluation Industrial literature Project success Risk management 


  1. Addi-Raccah, A. (2006). School leaders’ collaboration with external school agencies: A comparison between regular and decentralized schools. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 6(2), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.Google Scholar
  4. Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2014). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Bryde, D. (2008). Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 26(8), 800–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, D. T. (2010). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 7(15), 3–43.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2003). Project risk management: Processes, techniques, and insights. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, D. F. (2005). Project risk management guidelines: Managing risk in large projects and complex procurements. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eger, L., & Egerová, D. (2016). Project risk management in educational organizations: A case from the Czech Republic. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 578–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman, I. (2005). Measurement and evaluation of social and educational programs. Israel: Szold.Google Scholar
  13. Gibton, D. (2011). Post-2000 law-based educational governance in Israel: From equality to diversity? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(4), 434–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Globerson, S., Shtuv, A., & Zwikael, O. (2009). Project management planning, execution and control. Tel Aviv: Duonon.Google Scholar
  15. Goldring, E., & Schuermann, P. (2009). The changing context of K-12 education administration: Consequences for Ed. D. program design and delivery. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 9–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  18. Hess, F. M., & McShane, M. Q. (2016). Educational entrepreneurship today. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  19. Joint Committee in Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Jugdev, K., & Müller, R. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19–31.Google Scholar
  21. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lock, M. D. (2014). The essentials of project management. London: Gower Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Louis, K. S., Thomas, E., Gordon, M. F., & Febey, K. S. (2008). State leadership for school improvement: An analysis of three states. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 562–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J., Jr. (2011). Project management: A managerial approach. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1992). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer & R. W. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 45–70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 10(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mu, J., Peng, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2009). Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation, 29(3), 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nevo, D. (1989). Useful evaluation evaluating educational & social projects. Israel: Massada Ltd.Google Scholar
  31. Nevo, D. (2013). Testing and evaluation for better and for worse: Can we do without them? Israel: Reches Academy.Google Scholar
  32. Nir, A. (2009). Centralization and school empowerment: From rhetoric to practice. New York: Nova Biomedical Books.Google Scholar
  33. Normore, A. H. (2004). The edge of chaos: School administrators and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(1), 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Novoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey. Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ogawa, R. T., Sandholtz, J. H., Martinez-Flores, M., & Scribner, S. P. (2003). The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district’s standards-based curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 147–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ozga, J. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation. Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinto, J. K. (2013). Project management: Achieving competitive advantage. New York: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. PMBOK Guide. (2006). A guide to the project management body of knowledge, association for project management. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Sadgrove, K. (2016). The complete guide to business risk management. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Salomo, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stevenson, H., & Wood, P. (2014). Markets, managerialism and teachers’ work: The invisible hand of high stakes testing in England. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 42–61.Google Scholar
  45. Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 89, 7–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock.Google Scholar
  47. Teller, J., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2014). Risk management in project portfolios is more than managing project risks: A contingency perspective on risk management. Project Management Journal, 45(4), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Walton, E. J., & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers’ perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Westerveld, E. (2003). The project excellence model: Linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wohlstetter, P., Malloy, C. L., Smith, J., & Hentschke, G. (2004). Incentives for charter schools: Building school capacity through cross-sectoral alliances. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(3), 321–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yemini, M., Addi-Raccah, A., & Katarivas, K. (2015). I have a dream: School principals as entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 526–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yemini, M., & Sagie, N. (2015). School–nongovernmental organization engagement as an entrepreneurial venture: A case study of sunlight’s engagement with Israeli Schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miri Yemini
    • 1
  • Izhar Oplatka
    • 1
  • Netta Sagie
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations