Project Implementation in Schools

  • Miri Yemini
  • Izhar Oplatka
  • Netta Sagie


The phase of project implementation refers to the efforts involved in directing the progress of a project against the project plan, intended to minimize the variances between the planned and actual progress. Inherent in this phase is change management and process inevitably taken by the project manager and team to meet the project goals and plan. In fact, project implementation encompasses educational changes on different levels that take place as the design and development of the project mature.


Collaborating Change management Project manager Goals Implementation Development 


  1. Addi-Raccah, A., & Ainhoren, R. (2009). School governance and teachers’ attitudes to parents’ involvement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 805–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addi-Raccah, A., & Grinshtain, Y. (2016). Forms of capital and teachers’ views of collaboration and threat relations with parents in Israeli schools. Education and Urban Society, 49, 616–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, P. K., & Shepherd, C. D. (2010). Innovation management: Context, strategies, systems and process. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Argyle, M. (1967). The social psychology of social change. In T. B. Burns & S. B. Saul (Eds.), Social theory and economic change. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  5. Avvisati, F., Gurgand, M., Guyon, N., & Maurin, E. (2014). Getting parents involved: A field experiment in deprived schools. Review of Economic Studies, 81, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailey, B. (2000). The impact of mandated change on teachers. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change (pp. 112–127). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  7. Baldridge, J. V. (1975). Organizational change and the consultant’s role: Rules for effective action. In J. V. Baldridge & T. E. Deal (Eds.), Managing change in educational organizations: Sociological perspectives, strategies, and case studies (pp. 283–298). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. (1987). First order, second-order and third-order change and organization development: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, J. S., Hughes, R. M., & Brooks, M. C. (2008). Fear and trembling in the American high school: Educational reform and teacher alienation. Educational Policy, 22(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese, R. L. (2003). The ethical imperative to lead change: Overcoming the resistance to change. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
  11. Chrispeels, J. H., Castillo, S., & Brown, J. (2000). School leadership teams: A process model of team development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1), 20–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clement, J. (2014). Managing mandated educational change. School Leadership & Management, 34(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coghlan & Rashford. (2006). Organizational change and strategy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Collerette, P., Lauzier, M., & Schneider, R. (2012). Le Pilotage Du Changement. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, B., & Ellison, L. (1997). Strategic marketing for schools. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Dee, J., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban Education, 41(6), 603–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance and the real- life problems of innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Foskett, N. (2002). Marketing. In T. Bush & L. Bell (Eds.), The principles and practice of educational management (pp. 241–257). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  19. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gabelica, C., Van den Bossche, P., De Maeyer, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change. Learning and Instruction, 34, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gitlin, A., & Magonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103, 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gofen, A. (2012). Entrepreneurial exit response to dissatisfaction with public services. Public Administration, 90(4), 1088–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanson, E. M. (1996). Educational administration and organizational behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Have, S. T., Have, W. T., Huijsmans, A. B., & van der Eng, N. (2015). Change competence: Implementing effective change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Holmes, K., Clement, J., & Albright, J. (2013). The complex task of leading educational change in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33(3), 270–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horvat, E. M. (2011). Pioneer parents and creating pathways for involvement. In C. H. Hands & L. Hubbard (Eds.), Including families and communities in urban education (pp. 161–186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  30. Katz, D., & Khan, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1109–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kotler, P., & Fox, K. A. (1995). Strategic marketing for educational institutions. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (1999). Principles of marketing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. Le Levre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Haper & Row.Google Scholar
  38. Lock, D. (2007). Project management (9th ed.). Cornwall: Gower.Google Scholar
  39. Mullins, L. J. (2005). Management and organizational behavior. San Francisco: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Oostdam, R., & Hooge, E. (2013). Making the difference with active parenting; forming educational partnerships between parents and schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oplatka, I. (2007). The place of the ‘open house’ in the school choice process: Insights from Canadian parents, children and teachers. Urban Education, 42(2), 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oplatka, I. (2017). Principal workload: Components, determinants and coping strategies in an era of standardization and accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(5), 552–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2012). The research on school marketing: Current issues and furture directions – An updated version. In I. Oplatka & J. Hemsley-Brown (Eds.), The leadership and management of educational marketing: Research, practice and implications (pp. 3–35). London: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Panferov, S. (2010). Increasing ELL parental involvement in our schools: Learning from the parents. Theory into Practice, 49(2), 106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pardey, D. (1991). Marketing for Schools. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  46. Parsons, S. A., Morewood, A., & Ankrum, J. W. (2016). Barriers to change: Findings from three literacy professional learning initiatives. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(4), 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rashford, N. S., & Coghlan, D. (1994). The dynamics of organizational levels: A change framework for managers and consultants. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  49. Resenau, M. D., & Githens, G. D. (2005). Successful project management: A step-by-step approach with practical examples. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  50. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2012). Essentials of organizational behaviour. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  51. Schein, E. H. (1987). Process consultation: Vol. 2 its role in organization development (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  52. Scragg, T. (2010). Managing change in health and social care services. Brighton: Pavilion Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Sikes, P. J. (1992). Imposed change and the experienced teacher. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, K. A. (2007). Teamwork and project management (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Starr, K. (2011). Principals and the politics of resistance to change. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(6), 646–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor, G. C. (2008). Project scheduling and cost control: Planning, monitoring and controlling the baseline. Fort Lauderdale: J. Ross Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform: Reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership & Management, 33(5), 486–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yemini, M., Ramot, R., & Sagie, N. (2016). Parental ‘intrapreneurship’ in action: Theoretical elaboration through the Israeli case study. Educational Review, 68(2), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zaho, Y. (2011). Students as change partners: A proposal for educational change in the age of globalization. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miri Yemini
    • 1
  • Izhar Oplatka
    • 1
  • Netta Sagie
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations