Skip to main content

The Death Conundrum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Ethics of Cryonics
  • 487 Accesses

Abstract

Cryonics is considered a key step towards indefinite life extension. But are there good reasons to extend the human lifespan beyond its current limit? One possible reason is that death is bad, and since death is bad, we should avoid dying by staying alive indefinitely. In this chapter, possible explanations for why death might be bad are examined. In particular, two accounts of the badness of death are considered in detail: death as deprivation of a future life and death as frustration of desires and preferences. These two accounts of the badness of death provide good reasons for considering death bad under certain circumstances (although not under all circumstances, such as when a life entails unbearable pain), yet leave open the question of whether immortality might be an even worse alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Given the limited scope of this book, I will leave aside non-Western cultures in which the influence of traditions like Hinduism and Buddhism have contributed to the development of a different approach to life and death.

  2. 2.

    Many languages have an equivalent of the sentence “if my grandmother had wheels, she would be a cart”, a joke used to reply to someone fantasizing about hypotheticals in which the premises implies a scenario that is incompatible with the existence of the subject who is speaking (“If I were born in Ancient Greece” or “If my mother were Cleopatra”).

  3. 3.

    I will consider conceivability the mere metaphysical possibility of something (I can conceive of a green horse, but I cannot conceive of a horse that is also a cabbage). I will consider possible something that is not merely conceivable, but also has some chances to happen (it is possible that a horse lives up to 50 years, although it has never happened). I will consider probable something that has quite high chances of happening (it is probable that a horse lives at least 20 years).

  4. 4.

    For instance, Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin are among those who think indefinite life extension will probably be available within the next 20 years. See, for example, Friend (2017).

  5. 5.

    This character was originally developed in a play by Karel Čapek, and later on adapted into an opera by Janacek.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minerva, F. (2018). The Death Conundrum. In: The Ethics of Cryonics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78599-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78599-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78598-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78599-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics