Abstract
This study explores the perceptions of elementary teachers in defining and identifying gifted students in order to understand how Lebanese teachers currently view giftedness and to devise a single consolidated definition. The purpose of this chapter is fourfold: to discuss the results obtained, to draw conclusions grounded in the participants’ perspectives and connect them to the literature, to suggest a proposal for a policy that could be adopted with what we were able to learn from this study, and to provide implications for future research and practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Fleith, D. S., & Arancibia, V. (2009). Gifted education and research on giftedness in South America. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook of giftedness (pp. 1491–1506). New York: Springer.
Al-Hroub, A. (2010). Developing assessment profiles for mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties in England. Journal of Education for the Gifted, 34(1), 7–44.
Al-Hroub, A. (2012). Theoretical issues surrounding the concept of gifted with learning difficulties. International Journal for Research in Education, 31, 30–60.
Al-Hroub, A. (2013). Multidimensional model for the identification of gifted children with learning disabilities. Gifted and Talented International, 28, 51–69.
Al-Hroub, A. (2014). Identification of dual-exceptional learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science Journal, 116, 63–73.
Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006). Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(2), 112–122.
Bracken, B. A., & Keith, L. K. (2004). CAB, Clinical Assessment of Behavior: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources: PAR.
Diab, R. (2006). University students’ beliefs about learning English and French in Lebanon. Systems, 34(1), 80–96.
Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306.
Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(3), 141–141.
Freeman, J. (2003). Gender differences in gifted achievement in Britain and the USA. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(3), 202–211.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gross, M. U. M. (2003). International perspectives. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 547–557). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Heller, K. (2005). The Munich model of giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 147–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. The Teachers College Record, 44(1), 56–56.
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(4), 322–336.
Lee, L. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and talented young children. High Ability Studies, 10(3), 183–196.
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted rating scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. New York: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Renzulli, J. S. (1990). A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Childhood Development, 63(2), 9–18.
Rimm, S., Siegle, D., & Davis, G. (2018). Education of the gifted and talented (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Rogers, K. B. (2009). Leadership giftedness: Is it innate or can it be developed? In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 633–645). New York: Springer.
Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). Discovering multiple intelligences through a performance-based assessment: Consistency with independent ratings. Exceptional Children, 65(2), 151–161.
Sarouphim, K. M. (2009). The use of a performance assessment for identifying gifted Lebanese students: Is DISCOVER effective? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(2), 275 295.
Sarouphim, K. M. (2010). A model for the education of gifted learners in Lebanon. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 71–79.
Sarouphim, K. M., & Maker, C. J. (2010). Ethnic and gender differences in identifying gifted students: A multi-cultural analysis. International Education, 39(2), 42–48.
Silverman, L. K. (1993a). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love.
Silverman, L. K. (1993b). Counseling needs and programs for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 631–647). New York: Pergamon.
Silverman, L. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), Social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 145–153). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
Silverman, L. K. (2003). Gifted children with learning disabilities. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 533–543). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2004). International handbook of giftedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tobin, J. J., Wu, D. Y. H., & Davidson, D. H. (1989). Preschool in three cultures: Japan. In China and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Tsuin-chen, O. (1961). Some facts and ideas about talent and genius in Chinese history. In G. Z. F. Bereday & J. A. Lauwerys (Eds.), Concepts of excellence in education: The year-book of education (pp. 213–221). New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Ziegler, A., & Stroger, H. (2004). Identification based on ENTER within the conceptual frame of the actiotope model of giftedness. Psychology Science, 46(3), 324–241.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Al-Hroub, A., El Khoury, S. (2018). Giftedness in Lebanon: Emerging Issues and Future Considerations. In: Gifted Education in Lebanese Schools. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78592-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78592-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78591-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78592-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)