Skip to main content

States’ Regulation of Virtual Currencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulation of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology ((FST))

Abstract

We proceed with a review of all of the states and their endeavors to deal with the latest innovative technologies. We note that states have many varying views concerning whether to regulate, the websites to warn inhabitants of the risks of virtual currency investments, whether to tax transactions, or even welcome their advent viewing the innovations as a further major step towards an increase in safety, lower costs, and other advantages. Some states license virtual currency businesses, others are content to simply warn of their risks, while other states appear to almost ignore the developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an excellent summary of the laws and regulations pertaining to virtual currencies or the lack thereof, see Carlton Fields, Matthew Kohen, and Justin Wales, State Regulations On Virtual Currencies and Blockchain Technologies, Nov. 10, 2017, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/state-regulations-on-virtual-currency-14945/

  2. 2.

    State Survey on the Treatment of Virtual Currency, https://advance.lexis.com/open/document/lpadocument/?pdmfid=1000522&crid=13b9c497-adf7-4e02-b764-76be211e569b&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fforms%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5FV2-K6T1-JFSV-G1GF-00000-00&pddocid=urn%3AcontentItem%3A5FV2-K6T1-JFSV-G1GF-00000-00&pdcontentcomponentid=102984&pdteaserkey=sr0&ecomp=5vkg&earg=sr0&prid=66adc6fe-f905-4247-96b9-525fa86b58a6

  3. 3.

    The review relies heavily on the analysis of Thomas Brown, 50-STATE-SURVEY: Money Transmitter Licensing Requirements, http://abnk.assembly.ca.gov/sites/abnk.assembly.ca.gov/files/50%20State%20Survey%20-%20MTL%20Licensing%20Requirements%2872986803_4%29.pdf and Latham & Watkins’ The Other Side of the Coin: Bitcoin, Blockchain, Regulation & Enforcement, FIA, Mar. 24, 2016, https://lc.fia.org/sites/default/files/LW_2016%20FIA%20Bitcoin%20Webinar%20Presentation.pdf

  4. 4.

    Alabama Money Transmission Act, H.B. 215, 2017 Leg., Reg. Sess. (Ala. 2017) §8-7A-2(8).

  5. 5.

    Cal. Stat. §320.6.

  6. 6.

    Cal. Assembly Bill AB-1123, Virtual Currency: Regulation (Feb. 17, 2017), https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB1123

  7. 7.

    Conn. Pub. Act 15-53, An act Concerning Mortgage Correspondent Lenders, The Small Act, Virtual Currencies and Security Freezes on Consumer Credit Reports, Sec. 7(7)(c)((d), https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/ACT/PA/2015PA-00053-R00HB-06800-PA.htm

  8. 8.

    Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, Consumer and Investor Guidance on Virtual Currency, April 30, 2014, https://dbf.georgia.gov/sites/dbf.georgia.gov/files/related_files/document/consumer-advisory-virtual-currencies.pdf

  9. 9.

    Ga. Code Ann. §7-1-680(26), discussed in Justin S. Wales and Matthew E. Kohen, State Regulations on Virtual Currency And Blockchain Technologies, Oct. 17, 2017, https://www.carltonfields.com/state-regulations-on-virtual-currency-and-blockchain-technologies-10-17-2017/. This article was also used as a source for discussion of the laws and regulations governing virtual currencies among the 50 states.

  10. 10.

    Idaho Department of Finance, Idaho Money Transmitters Section, http://www.finance.idaho.gov/MoneyTransmitter/MoneyTransmitter.aspx

  11. 11.

    An Act relating to electronic transactions; recognizing blockchain technology as a type of electronic record for the purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act; prohibiting a local government from taxing or imposing restrictions upon the use of a blockchain; and providing other matters properly relating thereto. SB 398, June 5, 2017, https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/79th2017/Bill/5463/Overview

  12. 12.

    Stan Higgins, Nevada Becomes First US State to Ban Blockchain Taxes, CoinDesk, June 6, 2017, https://www.coindesk.com/nevada-first-us-state-ban-blockchain-taxes/

  13. 13.

    New York Statutes. Title 23, Ch. 1, Part 200, Virtual Currencies, http://www.dfs.ny.gov/legal/regulations/adoptions/dfsp200t.pdf

  14. 14.

    Id. Part 200.2(q).

  15. 15.

    Taken from the recitation by the court in Chino v. New York Dept. of Financial Services , 2017 NY Slip Op 51908, NY: Supreme Court 2017, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15872102065273065030. The regulation is 23 NYCRR §§200.7–200.22.

  16. 16.

    New York State Department of Financial Services, NYDFS Grand First Charter to a New York Virtual Currency Company (May 7, 2017), Press Release, http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1505071.htm

  17. 17.

    New York State Department of Financial Services, NYDFC Announces Approval of First BitLicense Application From a Virtual Currency Firm, Sept. 22, 2015, Press Release, http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press/pr1509221.htm

  18. 18.

    Chino v. Dept. of Financial Services, Claim No. 124835, Index No. 101880-15 (NY Ct. Cl., 2015), http://vertumnus.courts.state.ny.us/claims/html/2015-049-021.html

  19. 19.

    Michael del Castillio, Bitcoin Exchange Coinbase Received New York BitLicense, Coindesk, Jan. 17, 2017, https://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchange-coinbase-receives-bitlicense/

  20. 20.

    Daniel Roberts, Behind the “exodus” of bitcoin startups from New York, Aug. 14, 2015, Fortune, http://fortune.com/2015/08/14/bitcoin-startups-leave-new-york-bitlicense/

  21. 21.

    The North Carolina Money Transmitters Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. §53-208.1, et seq. §53-208.43 and §53-208.47, https://www.nccob.org/Public/financialinstitutions/mt/mtrules.aspx

  22. 22.

    Texas Department of Banking, Supervisory Memorandum – 1037, April 3, 2014, http://www.dob.texas.gov/public/uploads/files/consumer-information/sm1037.pdf

  23. 23.

    Texas Money Services Act, Ch. 1099 (H.B. 2218), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.

  24. 24.

    Vermont statutes, Title 12, Ch. 081, §1913.

  25. 25.

    Josh Garcia, Vermont changes money transmitter law to formally include virtual currency, Cooley Fintech, May 8, 2017, https://fintech.cooley.com/2017/05/08/vermont-changes-money-transmitter-law-to-formally-include-virtual-currency/

  26. 26.

    Virginia State Corporation Commission, Notice to Virginia Resident Regarding Virtual Currencies, https://www.scc.virginia.gov/bfi/files/virtcur.pdf, citing Chapter 19 of Title 6.2 of the Code of Virginia (Money Order Sellers and Money Transmitters), §6.2-1900, et seq.

  27. 27.

    An Act Addressing licensing and enforcement provisions applicable to money transmitters and currency exchanges under the uniform money services act, §3, Wa SB 531, eff. July 31, 2017, https://legiscan.com/WA/drafts/SB5031/2017

  28. 28.

    Wy Stat §40-22-107 (1997 through Reg Sess), https://law.justia.com/codes/wyoming/2011/title40/chapter22/section40-22-107/

  29. 29.

    An Act amending Section 44-7003, Arizona Revised Statutes by amending Article 5 relating to electronic transactions, HB2417, signed into law March 29, 2017, https://legiscan.com/AZ/text/HB2417/id/1497439

  30. 30.

    An Act to Amend Title 8 of the Delaware Code Relating to the General Corporation Law, signed into law on July 21, 2017, https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail/25730

  31. 31.

    John Roberts, Companies Can Put Shareholders on a Blockchain Starting Today, Fortune, Aug. 1, 2017, http://fortune.com/2017/08/01/blockchain-shareholders-law/

  32. 32.

    Florida Money Laundering Act, Fl. Stat. §896.101(j), http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0896/0896.html

  33. 33.

    Hawaii-2017, https://legiscan.com/HI/text/HB1481/2017

  34. 34.

    Hawaii Sen. Bill No. 3082, eff. July 1, 2018, https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2018/bills/SB3082_.HTM

  35. 35.

    Jamie Redman, Hawaii’s New Money Transmitters Act Will Require Virtual Currency Licenses, bitcoin.com Jan. 31, 2018, https://news.bitcoin.com/hawaiis-new-money-transmitters-act-will-require-virtual-currency-licenses/, and Kevin Helms, Coinbase Exits as Hawaii Requires Bitcoin Companies to Hold Fiat Reserves, bitcoin.com, (Feb. 28, 2017), https://news.bitcoin.com/coinbase-exits-as-hawaii-requires-money-transmitter-license/

  36. 36.

    Illinois Transmitters of Money Act, 205, ILC§6571, http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1201&ChapterID=20

  37. 37.

    Id., 205 ILCS 605/10, P.A. 88-643, eff. 1-1-95.

  38. 38.

    Justin Marble, Massachusetts Announces ICO Sweep (Dec. 18, 2017), Foley Hoag, http://www.foleyhoag.com/our-firm/technology-and-entrepreneurship/insights/2017/massachusetts-announces-ico-sweep

  39. 39.

    In re Caviar and Kirill Bensonoff, Docket No. E-2017-0120 (Ma. Adm. Proceeding, Jan. 17, 2018).

  40. 40.

    Id.

  41. 41.

    State of New Jersey, Convertible Virtual Currency, TAM-2015-1(R), July 28, 2015, http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/pdf/pubs/tams/tam-2015-1.pdf

  42. 42.

    W. Va. Code §61-15-1-4 (2017).

  43. 43.

    Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner Guidance Document, Regulatory Treatment of Virtual Currencies Under the Kansas Money Transmission Act, MT-2014-01, https://www.scribd.com/document/233896435/Kansas-Virtual-Currency-Guidance-June-2014

  44. 44.

    James G. Gatto, Maryland Court Rules Virtual Currency Casino Not Illegal Gambling Despite Secondary Market, National Law Review, Nov. 15, 2016, https://www.natlawreview.com/article/maryland-court-rules-virtual-currency-casino-not-illegal-gambling-despite-secondary

  45. 45.

    Angie Jin, Virtual Casino Doesn’t Violate California’s Gambling Laws-Mason v. Machine Zone, Technology and Marketing Law Blog, Jan. 12, 2016, http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2016/01/virtual-casino-doesnt-violate-californias-gambling-law-mason-v-machine-zone-guest-blog-post.htm

  46. 46.

    In re Virtual Mining, Corporation, Mo. Sec. State, Case No. AP-14-09, June 2, 2014, https://www.sos.mo.gov/cmsimages/securities/orders/AP-14-09.pdf

  47. 47.

    Department of Administration, Department of Financial Institutions, http://banking.mt.gov/Complaints

  48. 48.

    N.H. 436, 2017 165th Sess. (N.H. 2017), https://legiscan.com/NH/bill/HB436/2017

  49. 49.

    Amanda Garrett, First Bitcoin ATM Arrives in Akron as virtual currency challenges the real thing, Akron Beacon Journal, April 30, 2016, https://www.ohio.com/akron/business/first-bitcoin-atm-arrives-in-akron-as-virtual-currency-challenges-the-real-thing

  50. 50.

    The Uniform Law Commission, also known as the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, was established in 1892 whose mission is “provide states with non-partisan, well-conceived and well-drafted legislation that brings clarity and stability to critical areas of state statutory law,” http://www.uniformlaws.org/Narrative.aspx?title=About the ULC

  51. 51.

    National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Uniform Regulation of Virtual-Currency Businesses Act, July 14–20, 2017. http://www.uniformlaws.org/shared/docs/regulation%20of%20virtual%20currencies/2017AM_URVCBA_AsApproved.pdf

  52. 52.

    Id. at 2.

  53. 53.

    Id.

  54. 54.

    State Legislators: Reject the “Uniform Regulation of Virtual Currency Business Act,” The Bitcoin Foundation, July 19, 2017, https://bitcoinfoundation.org/reject-uniform-regulation-virtual-currency-businesses-act/

  55. 55.

    Citing Daniel Roberts, Behind the “exodus” of bitcoin startups from New York, Fortune, Aug. 14, 2017, http://fortune.com/2015/08/14/bitcoin-startups-leave-new-york-bitlicense/

  56. 56.

    Llew Claasens, Letter to the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, The Bitcoin Foundation, Inc., July 14, 2017, https://bitcoinfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ULC-Virtual-Currencies_Jul142017-final.pdf

  57. 57.

    Conference of State Bank Supervisors, CSBS Policy on State Virtual Currency Regulation, Sept.15, 2017, https://www.csbs.org/model-regulatory-framework-virtual-currencies

  58. 58.

    Conference of State Bank Supervisors, State Regulatory Requirements for Virtual Currency Activities: CSBS Model Regulatory Framework (Sept. 15, 2015), https://www.csbs.org/sites/default/files/2017-11/CSBS-Model-Regulatory-Framework%28September%2015%202015%29.pdf

  59. 59.

    Id.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Girasa, R. (2018). States’ Regulation of Virtual Currencies. In: Regulation of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies. Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78509-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78509-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78508-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78509-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics