Advertisement

Introductory Chapter: An Interweaving to Be Formalized, the Biosphere Faced with the Relationship Between the Human and the Non-human

Chapter

Abstract

This introductory chapter delineates the challenge of formalizing a concept-paradigm and provides specific examples that could be considered as models of socio-ecological viability. We investigate the benefits that the concept of coviability brings to the concept of “sustainable development”. Contributions will be given throughout the book and will be summarized in a final chapter, which will define the concept-paradigm through a transdisciplinary approach.

References

  1. Acselrad H (2009) Conflitos ambientais no Brasil. Relume Dumará, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptative capacity. C.R. Geosci 337:399–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen CR, Gunderson L, Johnson AR (2005) The use of discontinuities and functional groups to assess relative resilience in complex systems. Ecosystems 8:958–966.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0147-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen e. (ed) (2003) Developing a high nature value farming area indicator. Final report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, 75 p. http://edepot.wur.nl/3918
  5. Aubin JP (1991) Viability theory. Birkhäuser, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Aubin J-P (2010) La mort du devin, l’émergence du démiurge. Essai sur la contingence, la viabilité et l’inertie des systèmes. Beauchesne/le miroir des savant, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Aubin J-P, Bayen A, Saint-Pierre P (2011) Viability theory, new directions. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrière O (2007) Régulation environnementale en Afrique: l’action du droit pour une co-viabilité des systèmes sociaux et écologiques. In: E Le Roy (dir.) Cahiers d’Anthropologie du Droit 2006, Le droit en action. Karthala, Paris, pp 125–174, 307 pagesGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrière O (2008a) Legal aspects of the co-viability of social and ecological systems in African arid zones: an anthropological approach to environmental law. In: Lee C, Schaaf T (eds) The future of drylands. Springer/UNESCO Publishing, Paris, pp 583–597Google Scholar
  10. Barrière O (2008b) L’intégration du droit dans la dialectique sociétés-écosystèmes, le droit d’une socio-écologie. In: Barrière O, Rochegude A (eds) Foncier et environnement en Afrique: des acteurs au(x) droit(s). Karthala, Paris, pp 39–128Google Scholar
  11. Barrière O (2011) Pluralisme juridique et patrimonialisation: entre paradigmes de l’ “appropriation” et du “patrimoine commun”. In: Serge Mam Lam Fouck, Isabelle Hidair (dir) La question du patrimoine en Guyane française. Diversité culturelle et patrimonialisation. Processus et dynamiques des constructions identitaires. Ibis Rouge Editions, Matoury, pp 43–75Google Scholar
  12. Barrière O (2012) Changement climatique et droit de l’homme: vers un droit de la coviabilité des systèmes sociaux et écologiques? In: Dormoy D, Kuyu C (dir.) Changements climatiques et droits humains. Espérance, Marcq-en-Baroeul, pp 227–250Google Scholar
  13. Barrière O (2015) Repenser le droit de l’environnement dans une conception renouvelée du développement durable: prospective d’un “droit de la coviabilité” des systèmes sociaux et écologiques. In: Blaise S, David C, David V (eds) Le développement durable en Océanie, vers une nouvelle éthique?, Actes du colloque international des 23–26 avril 2013 Koné, (Province Nord de la Nouvelle-Calédonie). Presses Universitaires de Provence & Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, Aix-en-Provence, pp 215–242Google Scholar
  14. Barrière O (2017) Human relationship to the land from a legal perspective as a human and environmental security challenge (Chap. 14). In: Behnassi M, McGlade K (eds) Environmental change and human security in Africa and the Middle East. Springer, Cham, pp 259–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45648-5_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barrière O, Faure J-F (2012) L’enjeu d’un droit négocié pour le Parc Amazonien de Guyane. Nat Sci Soc 20:167–180Google Scholar
  16. Barroca B, Maryline D, Irène M (2013) De la vulnérabilité à la résilience: mutation ou bouleversement? EchoGéo 24, Online: http://echogeo.revues.org/13439
  17. Bates DG (2005) Human adaptive strategies: ecology, culture, and politic. Pearson Education, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  18. Baumgärtner S, Quaas MF (2007) Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty. University of Lüneburg Working paper series in economics, No. 67. Leuphana-University, LüneburgGoogle Scholar
  19. Baumgärtner S, Quaas MF (2009) Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty. Ecol Econ 68:2008Google Scholar
  20. Becker BK (2007) Amazônia: geopolítica na virada do III milênio, 2nd edn. Garamond, Rio de Janeiro, 168 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Bélier I (2013) La reconnaissance internationale des peuples autochtones. In: Bélier (ed) peuples autochtones dans le monde. L’Harmattan-SOGIP, Paris, pp 13–37Google Scholar
  22. Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustanability. In: Linking social and ecological systems, management practices ans social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York, 4Google Scholar
  23. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Berque A (1996) Etre humains sur la terre. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Bertalanffy (von) L (1968/2012) Théorie générale des systèmes. Dunod, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Blandin P (2013) Towards EcoEvoEthics, in the structural links between ecology, evolution end ethics: the virtuous epistemic circle, Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 296. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 83–100Google Scholar
  27. Boisvert D (2006) Niklas Luhmann: la théorie des systèmes sociaux. Asp Soc 13(1):55–82Google Scholar
  28. Bonmatin J-M, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, Marzaro M, Mitchell EAD, Noome DA, Simon-Delso N, Tapparo A (2015) Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:35–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bourgine P (1996) In: Rialle V, Fisette D (eds) Modèles d’agents autonomes et leurs interactions co-évolutionnistes, Penser l’Esprit: des Sciences de la Cognition à une Philosophie Cognitive. Presses universitaires de Grenoble, Paris, pp 421–443Google Scholar
  30. Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1993). The Environment as Hazard, Guilford Press, 290 pGoogle Scholar
  31. Carlson R (1969) Primavera silenciosa, 2nd edn. Editora Melhoramentos, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  32. Cavalcanti C (2004) Uma tentativa de caracterização da economia ecológica. Ambiente e Sociedade, Campinas 7(1):149–156Google Scholar
  33. Cavalcanti C (2010) Concepções da economia ecológica: suas relações com a economia dominante e a economia ambiental. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo 24(68):53–67Google Scholar
  34. Cavalcanti C (2012) Sustentabilidade: mantra ou escolha moral? Uma abordagem ecológico-econômica. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo 26(74):35–50Google Scholar
  35. Cavalcanti C (2015) A concepção de desenvolvimento do Butão. Revista Ciência & Ambiente 50:5–19Google Scholar
  36. CCD Steering Committee (2012) Colony collapse disorder, progress report. United States Department of agricultureGoogle Scholar
  37. Chaptal de Chanteloup C (2015) La chaîne de valeur de l’offre. De BoeckGoogle Scholar
  38. Chen YP, Pettis JS, Corona M, Chen WP, Li CJ, Spivak M et al (2014) Israeli acute paralysis virus: epidemiology, pathogenesis and implications for honey bee health. PLoS Pathog 10(7):e100426.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Chevallier J (2001) La régulation juridique en question. Droit et Société 49:827–846Google Scholar
  40. Clément H (2009) L’abeille sentinelle de l’environnement. Alternatives, ParisGoogle Scholar
  41. Clément, H, Le Conte Y (2011) Traité rustica de l’apiculture. Rustica éditionsGoogle Scholar
  42. Cohen D (2012) Homo economicus, Prophète (égaré) des temps nouveaux. Albin MichelGoogle Scholar
  43. Combes C (1995) Interactions Durables. Ecologie et Evolution du Parasitisme. Masson, Paris, 518 pGoogle Scholar
  44. Cox-Foster DL, Conlan S, Holmes EC, Palacios G, Evans JD, Moran NA, Quan P-L, Briese T, Mady, Geiser DM, Vince, Dennis (van) E, Kalkstein Abby L, Andrew, Jeffrey, Junhui, Cui L, Stephen K, Fredrik J, Michael, Jeffery S, Lipkin WI (2007) A metagenomic survey of microbes in honey bee colony collapse disorder. Science 318(5848):283–287.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1146498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Crédit Suisse (2015) Global wealth report 2015. Crédit Suisse, Zurich, 64 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Crutzen P (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415(6867):23Google Scholar
  47. Cumming GS, Collier J (2005) Change and identity in complex systems. Ecol Soc 10(1):29 Online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art29/
  48. Dahl LA (1996) The eco principle. Zed Book Ltd, London & New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  49. Daly HE (2002) Desenvolvimento sustentável: definições, princípios, políticas. Cadernos de estudos sociais, Recife 18(2):171–184Google Scholar
  50. Décamps H (2007) La vulnérabilité des systèmes socioécologiques aux évènements extrêmes: exposition, sensibilité, résilience. Nat Sci Soc 15:48–52Google Scholar
  51. Descola P (1985) De l’Indien naturalisé à l’Indien naturaliste: sociétés amazoniennes sous le regard de l’Occident. In: Cadoret A (ed) Protection de la nature: histoire et idéologie. De la nature à l’environnement. L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 221–235Google Scholar
  52. Descola P (2005) Par-delà nature et culture. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  53. Diamond J (2005) Collapse, how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Djament-Tran G, Reghezza-Zitt M (dir) (2012) Résiliences urbaines, les villes face aux catastrophes. édition du manuscrit, 360 pGoogle Scholar
  55. Djament-Tran G, Le Blanc A, Lhomme S, Rufat S, Reghezza-Zitt M (2011). Ce que la résilience n’est pas, ce qu’on veut lui faire dire. HAL Archives ouvertes hal-00679293Google Scholar
  56. Ducroux A-M (2003) Les nouveaux utopistes du développement durable. Autrement, ParisGoogle Scholar
  57. Durand D (1994) La Systémique. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  58. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution, reviewed work(s). Evolution, 18(4):586–608, Society for the Study of Evolution Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2406212 Google Scholar
  59. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2012) Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. ReportGoogle Scholar
  60. European Commission (2014) Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe, Brussels, 2.7.2014 COM(2014) 398 finalGoogle Scholar
  61. Filoche G (2011) Les amérindiens de guyane française, de reconnaissances disparates en bricolages juridiques. L’exemple des kali’na d’awala-yalimapo, Journal de la société des Américanistes 97(2):343–367Google Scholar
  62. Fischer J, Müller T, Spatz A-K, Greggers U, Grünewald B et al (2014) Neonicotinoids interfere with specific components of navigation in honeybees. PLoS One 9(3):e91364.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267Google Scholar
  64. Folke C (2010) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmquist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31(5):437–440Google Scholar
  66. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473Google Scholar
  67. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ Google Scholar
  68. Folke C, Jansson A, Rockström J, Per O, Carpenter SR, Chapin SF, Crépin A-S, Daily G, Danell K, Ebbesson J et al (2011) Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio 40(7):719–738Google Scholar
  69. Frisch (von) K (2011 (1927)) Vie et mœurs des abeilles. Albin Michel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  70. Garmestani AS, Allen CR, Gunderson L (2009) Panarchy: discontinuities reveal similarities in the dynamic system structure of ecological and social systems. Ecol Soc 14(1):15. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art15/ Google Scholar
  71. Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (EUA)Google Scholar
  72. Gudynas E, Acosta A (2011a) El buen vivir o la disolución de la idea del progreso. In: Rojas M (coord.). La medición del progreso y del bienestar. Propuesta desde América Latina. Foro consultivo científico y tecnológico. AC, México, DF (México)Google Scholar
  73. Gudynas, E, Acosta A (2011b) La renovación de la crítica al desarrollo y el buen vivir como alternativa. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana/Año 16. N° 53 (Abril-Junio, 2011) p 71–83. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social/ISSN 1315-5216. CESA – FCES – Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo-VenezuelaGoogle Scholar
  74. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy, understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  75. Gunderson L, Holling CS, Pritchard L, Peterson GD (2002) Resilience. In: Mooney HA, Canadell JG (eds) Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Volume 2, The earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environmental change. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Chichester, pp 530–531Google Scholar
  76. Gunther M (2014) Vers un monde sans déchets. ENSIA, Saint Paul, USA, in Courrier International, n°1258, Economie circulaire, Rien ne se perd, tout se transforme, Un monde sans déchets vu par la presse étrangère, p 29Google Scholar
  77. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science, New York 13:1243–1248Google Scholar
  78. Hartus P, Virard M-P (2015) Croissance zéro, comment éviter le chaos? FayardGoogle Scholar
  79. Heck S, Rogers M (2014) Ressources revolution: how to capture the biggest business opportunity in a century. New Harvest, Boston/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Helm D (ed) (1991) Economic policy towards the environment. Blackwell Publisher, Oxford/Cambridge, 326 pGoogle Scholar
  81. Hirsch HG, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405Google Scholar
  84. Hong S-K et al (2007) Landscape ecological applications in man-influenced areas. Linking man and nature systems. Springer, Dordrecht, 535 pGoogle Scholar
  85. Horlick-Jones T, Sime J (2004) Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:441–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hubert B, Deverre C, Meuret M (2010) Deux siècles de changements radicaux pour les parcours du Sud de la France. In: Michel Meuret (dir) Un savoir-faire de bergers, éditions Quae, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  87. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) (2007) HNV Indicators for Evaluation, Rapport final pour la DG Agriculture, Avis de marché 2006- G4-04Google Scholar
  88. IPCC (2001) Bilan des changements climatiques, rapport de synthèse, Troisième rapport d’évaluation. Groupe intergouvernemental d’experts sur l’évolution du climat, Genève, www.ipcc.ch
  89. Jackson T (2013) Prosperidade sem crescimento: vida boa em um planeta finito. Planeta Sustentável, Abril Editora, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  90. Johnson R (2007) Recent honey bee colony declines, CRS report for Congress. Congressional Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  91. Johnson R (2010) Honey bee colony collapse disorder, CRS report for Congress. Congressional Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
  92. Jollivet M (2001) Le développement durable, de l’utopie au concept. Elsevier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  93. Kemlin JE (1917) L’alliance chez les Reungao. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême- Orient 17:1–119.  https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1917.5321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Klein RJ, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is the concept? Environ Hazards 5(1–2):35–45Google Scholar
  95. Klein A-M, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274(1608):303–313.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kohler F (2011) Diversité culturelle et diversité biologique: une approche critique fondée sur l’exemple brésilien. Nat Sci Soc 19:113–124Google Scholar
  97. Landais E, Balent G (1993) Introduction à l’étude des pratiques d’élevage extensif. Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement 27:13–34Google Scholar
  98. Lawrence RJ, Després C (2004) Introduction. Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:397–405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Leenhardt M (1947) Do kamo: la personne et le mythe dans le monde mélanésien. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  100. Le Fur, Curry, Laloe, Durand, Chaboud (1999) Co-viabilité des systèmes halieutiques. Nat Sci Soc 7(2):19–32Google Scholar
  101. Leff E (2009a) A reapropriação social da natureza. In: Leff E (ed) Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder, 7th edn. Vozes, Petrópolis, pp 65–82Google Scholar
  102. Leff E (2009b) Democracia ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável. In: Leff E (ed) Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder, 7th edn. Vozes, Petrópolis, pp 56–64Google Scholar
  103. Leff E (2009c) Educação ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável. In: Leff E (ed) Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder, 7th edn. Vozes, Petrópolis, pp 236–252Google Scholar
  104. Leff E (2009d) A cultura como mediação de processos econômicos e ecológicos. In: Leff E (ed) Ecologia, capital e cultura. Vozes, Petrópolis, pp 98–142Google Scholar
  105. Leff E (2010) Epistemologia ambiental, 5th edn. Cortez, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  106. Leff E (2014) La apuesta por la vida: imaginación sociológica e imaginários sociales en los territorios ambientales del sur. Siglo XXI Editores, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  107. Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahms -torf S, Schellnhuber HJ (2008) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. PNAS 105(6):1786–1793Google Scholar
  108. Le Roy E (1999) Le jeu des lois, une anthropologie “dynamique” du Droit. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  109. Lesne A (2008) Complexité du vivant, sélection naturelle et évolution. Nat Sci Soc 16:150–153; et 17, 55-56 (2009)Google Scholar
  110. Lévêque C, Muxart T, Abbadie L, Weil A, van der Leeuw S (2003) L’anthroposystème: entité structurelle et fonctionnelle des interactions sociétés – milieux. In: Lévêque C, van der Leeuw S (eds) Quelles natures voulons-nous? Elsevier, Paris, pp 110–129Google Scholar
  111. Lévy-Bruhl L (1922) La Mentalité primitive. Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  112. Lexmond MB (v), Bonmatin J-M, Goulson D, Noome DA (2015) Worldwide integrated assessment on systemic pesticides global collapse of the entomofauna: exploring the role of systemic insecticides. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3220-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Li Gan_shun (2002) To achieve “double-win” of economy and environment by developing circular economy. J Hebei Univ (Philos Soc Sci Inst Jpn Stud), 03, Baoding, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  114. Liu J et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Luhmann N (1990) Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  116. Maeterlinck M (1901) La vie des abeilles. Eugène Fasqeulle éditeur, ParisGoogle Scholar
  117. Marais E (1973/1925) The soul of the white ant. Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  118. Martin S (2004) The cost of restoration as a way of defining resilience: a viability approach applied to a model of lake eutrophication. Ecol Soc 9(2):8. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art8/, Published here under license by The Resilience AllianceGoogle Scholar
  119. Martinet V, Doyen L (2007) Sustainability of an economy with an exhaustible resource: a viable control approach, Working Papers 22177, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, FrancerGoogle Scholar
  120. Martinez Alier J (2007) O ecologismo dos pobres. Contexto, São Paulo, 380 pGoogle Scholar
  121. Mathevet R, Bousquet F (2014) Résilience environnement, Panser les changements socio-écologiques. Buchet-Chatel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  122. Mathevet R, Thompson J, Delanoë O, Cheylan M, Gil-Fourrier C, Bonnin M (2010) La solidarité écologique: un nouveau concept pour une gestion intégrée des parcs nationaux et des territoires. Nat Sci Soc 18(4):424–433Google Scholar
  123. Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D (2002) Limits to growth. The 30-year update. Chelsea Green Publishing, Post MillsGoogle Scholar
  124. Meuret M (2010a) Un savoir-faire de bergers. éditions Quae, Paris, 333pGoogle Scholar
  125. Meuret M (2010b) Stimuler l’appétit lors des circuits de garde: échange d’expériences entre un berger et un chevrier. In: Meuret M (ed) Un savoir-faire de bergers. éditions Quae, Paris, pp 149–165Google Scholar
  126. Meyer B, et al (2011) Macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment, gws Research Report 2012/1 (ENV.F.1/ETU/2010/0033)Google Scholar
  127. Morin E (1973) Le paradigme perdu: la nature humaine, Points Essai, Paris, 249pGoogle Scholar
  128. Morin E (1985) La Vie de la vie, La Méthode, t. 2. Le Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  129. Moritz Robin FA, Southwick EE (1992) Bees as superorganisms: an evolutionary reality. Springer/Heidelberg GmbH & Co, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  130. Olsson P (2003) Building capacity for resilience in social-ecological systems. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Systems Ecology Stockholm University, Sweden, 37pGoogle Scholar
  131. OXFAM (2015) Insatiable richesse: toujours plus pour ceux qui ont déjà tout. Oxfam International, Oxford, 2015, 14 p. Online: https://oxfam.qc.ca/communiques/2015-01-19_les-1-les-plus-riches-poss-deront-plus-que-le-reste-de-la-population-mondiale
  132. Page RE, Hölldobler B (2013) The spirit of the hive, the mechanisms of social evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  133. Passet R (1992) Le copilotage du développement économique et de la biosphère. Tiers-Monde 33(130):393–416Google Scholar
  134. Penelaud O (2010) Le paradigme de l’énaction aujourd’hui. Apports et limites d’une théorie cognitive “révolutionnaire”. PLASTIR 1:18Google Scholar
  135. Perry CJ,Søvika E, Myerscough MR, Andrew B (2015) Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), 112(6):1643–1644, Edited by Gene E. Robinson, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422089112 Google Scholar
  136. Pisa LW, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Downs CA, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Mc Field M, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Settele J, Simon-Delso N, Stark JD, Van der Sluijs JP, Van Dyck H, Wiemers M (2015) Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:68–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Plummer R, Armitage D (2010) Integrating perspectives on adaptive capacity and environmental governance. In: Derek A, Ryan P (eds) Adaptative capacity and environmental gouvernance. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  138. Porto-Gonçalves CW (2006) A globalização da natureza e a natureza da globalização. Civilização brasileira, Rio de Janeiro. 462 pGoogle Scholar
  139. Prisco et al (2011) Varroa destructor is an effective vector of Israeli acute paralysis virus in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. J Gen Virol 92(Pt 1):151–155.  https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.023853-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Ratnieks Francis LW, Carreck NL (2010) Clarity on honey bee collapse? Science 327:152.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Ribière M, Olivier V, Blanchard P, Schurr F, Celle O, Drajnudel P, Faucon J-P, Thiery R, Chauzat M-P (2008) Les effondrements de colonies d’abeilles: le cas du CCD (“colony collapse disorder”) et du virus IAPV (Israeli acute paralysis virus), Virologie (John Libbey eurotext), vol 12, issue 5 (Afssa, Unité pathologie de l’abeille, 06902 Sophia-Antipolis)Google Scholar
  142. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin SF III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475Google Scholar
  143. Rodrigues AM (1998) Produção e consumo do e no espaço. Problemática ambiental urbana. Disponível em http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/deed.pt. Também publicado em Rio de Janeiro: Hucitec. 193 p
  144. Rosnay (De) J (1975) Le macroscope, vers une vision globale. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  145. Ross A (2004) Introduction à l’empirisme juridique, LGDJ-Bruylant, 231pGoogle Scholar
  146. Rouland N (1991) In: Jacob O (ed) Aux confins du droit. Les Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, Aix-en-Provence, 318pGoogle Scholar
  147. Sabatier R (2010) Arbitrages multi-échelles entre production agricole et biodiversité dans un agroécosystème prairial, Thèse de doctorat, Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement de AgroParisTech, directeurs Muriel Tichit et Luc Doyen, 226pGoogle Scholar
  148. Sabatier R, Doyen L, Tichit M (2008) Evaluer l’effet des seuils de chargement sur les performances productives et écologiques de troupeaux valorisant des prairies à forts enjeux de biodiversité. Rencontre Recherche Ruminants (3R)/INRA 15:213–216Google Scholar
  149. Sabatier R, Doyen L, Tichit M (2010) Modelling trade-offs between livestock grazing and wader conservation in a grassland agroecosystem. Ecol Model 221:1292–1300Google Scholar
  150. Santos M (2006) A natureza do espaço. EDUSP, São Paulo, 494 pGoogle Scholar
  151. Savini I, Landais E, Thinon P, Deffontaines J-P (2010) Des pratiques d’un berger expérimenté à la construction d’outils d’aide à la gestion d’alpages. In: Meuret M (dir) Un savoir-faire de bergers. éditions Quae, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  152. Schröder-Butterfill E, Marianti R (2006) A framework for understanding old-age vulnerabilities. Ageing Soc 26(1):9–35Google Scholar
  153. Seeley TD (2010) Honeybee democracy. Princeton University Press, WoodstockGoogle Scholar
  154. Seeley TD (2014) Honeybee ecology. A study in the adaptation in social life. Princeton University Press, WoodstockGoogle Scholar
  155. Simonet G (2009) Le concept d’adaptation: polysémie interdisciplinaire et implication pour les changements climatiques. Nat Sci Soc 17(4):392–401Google Scholar
  156. Simon-Delso et al (2015) Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5–34Google Scholar
  157. Sinaï A (2011) Fukushima ou la fin de l'anthropocène. Sortir d'urgence de l'inanité de notre mode de croissance, Le Monde, 18.03.2011, on line : http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2011/03/18/fukushima-ou-la-fin-de-l-anthropocene_1495211_3232.html
  158. Stavenhagen R (2013) La protection des droits autochtones: le défi de la mise en œuvre. In: Bélier (dir) peuples autochtones dans le monde, Les enjeux de la reconnaissance. L’Harmattan-SOGIP, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  159. Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36(8): 614–621. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25547826
  160. Tabary J-C (1993) Théorie de la Connaissance et Autonomie Biologique. thèse, Available online at: http://cerveau.pensee.free.fr
  161. Tautz J (2008) The buzz about bees : biology of a superorganism, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  162. Tautz J (2009) L’étonnante abeille, ed. De Boeck & LarcierGoogle Scholar
  163. Tavoillot F, Tavoillot PH (2015) L'Abeille (et le) philosophe: Étonnant voyage dans la ruche des sages, Odile JacobGoogle Scholar
  164. Thomas F (2011) Cosmologies, diversité bioculturelle et préservation de l’environnement. Nat Sci Soc 19(2):129–132 Online: www.cairn.info/revue-natures-sciences-societes-2011-2-page-129.htm Google Scholar
  165. Tichit et al (2007) A co-viability model of grazing and bird community management in farmland. Ecol Model 206:277–293Google Scholar
  166. UNEP (2002) Diversité culturelle et biodiversité pour un développement durable, Table ronde organisée conjointement par l’UNESCO et le PNUE le 3 septembre 2002 à Johannesburg (Afrique du Sud) à l’occasion du Sommet mondial pour le développement durable, On line: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001322/132262f.pdf
  167. Vallejo MC et al (2011) La iniciativa yasuni-itt: desde una perspectiva multicriterial. Quito: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, PNUD; Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, FAOGoogle Scholar
  168. Vanderlinden J (1996) Anthropologie juridique, DallozGoogle Scholar
  169. Van Valen Lee (1973) A new evolutionary law, Evolutionary law, Vol 1, 1–30, Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
  170. Varela FJ, Maturana HR, Uribe R (1974) Autopoiesis : The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems 5(4):187–196Google Scholar
  171. Varela FJ (1989) Autonomie et connaissance. Essai sur le vivant. Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  172. Veyret Y, Reghezza M (2006) Vulnérabilité et risques. L’approche récente de la vulnérabilité, Responsabilité et environnement, n°43, 9–14. On line : http://www.annales.org/test-site/test-site/re/2006/re43/Veyret.pdf
  173. Vieville T (2005) Quelques idées sur le concept d’adaptation, On line : http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Thierry.Vieville/cours/adaptation.html
  174. Walker BH, Gunderson LH, Kinzig AP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13 [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/ Google Scholar
  175. Westley F, Carpenter SR, Brock WA, Holling CS, Gunderson LH (2002) Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In: Gunderson Lance H, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy, understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  176. Whitfield J (2008) An indifference to boundaries. Nature 451:872–873.  https://doi.org/10.1038/451872a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. World economic forum (2014) Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Report, prepared in collaboration with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and McKinsey & Company, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  178. Young OR, Berkhout F, Gallopin GC, Janssen MA, Ostrom E, van der LS (2006) The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Glob Environ Chang 16(2006):304–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Zaman L, Meyer JR, Devangam S, Bryson DM, Lenski RE et al (2014) Coevolution Drives the Emergence of Complex Traits and Promotes Evolvability. PLoS Biol 12(12):e1002023.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Zhijun F, Nailing Y (2007) Putting a circular economy into practice in China. Sustain Sci 2:95–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0018-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRD - French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, UMR ESPACE-DEVMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.The Federal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  3. 3.The Federal University of ParáBelémBrazil
  4. 4.IRSTEA, National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and AgricultureMontpellierFrance
  5. 5.VIMADES, (Viabilité, Marchés, Automatique et Décision)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations